Cited by 164Digital Mental Health InterventionsVirtual Reality Applications and ImpactsSimulation-Based Education in Healthcare

Experiential Virtual Scenarios With Real-Time Monitoring (Interreality) for the Management of Psychological Stress: A Block Randomized Controlled Trial

Open access
Gaggioli, Andrea, Pallavicini, Federica, Morganti, Luca, Serino, Silvia, Scaratti, Chiara, Briguglio, Marilena, Crifaci, Giulia, Vetrano, Noemi +11 more·2014·Journal of Medical Internet Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The recent convergence between technology and medicine is offering innovative methods and tools for behavioral health care. Among these, an emerging approach is the use of virtual reality (VR) within exposure-based protocols for anxiety disorders, and in particular posttraumatic stress disorder. However, no systematically tested VR protocols are available for the management of psychological stress. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to evaluate the efficacy of a new technological paradigm, Interreality, for the management and prevention of psychological stress. The main feature of Interreality is a twofold link between the virtual and the real world achieved through experiential virtual scenarios (fully controlled by the therapist, used to learn coping skills and improve self-efficacy) with real-time monitoring and support (identifying critical situations and assessing clinical change) using advanced technologies (virtual worlds, wearable biosensors, and smartphones). METHODS: The study was designed as a block randomized controlled trial involving 121 participants recruited from two different worker populations-teachers and nurses-that are highly exposed to psychological stress. Participants were a sample of teachers recruited in Milan (Block 1: n=61) and a sample of nurses recruited in Messina, Italy (Block 2: n=60). Participants within each block were randomly assigned to the (1) Experimental Group (EG): n=40; B1=20, B2=20, which received a 5-week treatment based on the Interreality paradigm; (2) Control Group (CG): n=42; B1=22, B2=20, which received a 5-week traditional stress management training based on cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT); and (3) the Wait-List group (WL): n=39, B1=19, B2=20, which was reassessed and compared with the two other groups 5 weeks after the initial evaluation. RESULTS: Although both treatments were able to significantly reduce perceived stress better than WL, only EG participants reported a significant reduction (EG=12% vs. CG=0.5%) in chronic "trait" anxiety. A similar pattern was found for coping skills: both treatments were able to significantly increase most coping skills, but only EG participants reported a significant increase (EG=14% vs CG=0.3%) in the Emotional Support skill. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings provide initial evidence that the Interreality protocol yields better outcomes than the traditionally accepted gold standard for psychological stress treatment: CBT. Consequently, these findings constitute a sound foundation and rationale for the importance of continuing future research in technology-enhanced protocols for psychological stress management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01683617; http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT01683617 (Archived by WebCite at http://www.webcitation.org/6QnziHv3h).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2196/jmir.3235

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [16]Wood DP Murphy JA Center KB Russ C McLay RN Reeves D Pyne J Shilling R Hagan J Wiederhold BK Combat related post traumatic stress disorder: a multiple case report using virtual reality graded exposure therapy with physiological monitoring Stud Health Technol Inform 2008 132 556 61 18391367 18391367
  2. [68]Manzoni GM Preziosa A Pagnini F Castelnuovo G Molinari E Riva G New Technologies and Relaxation: An exploratory study on obese patients with emotional eating. The Role Of Presence Journal of Cybertherapy and Rehabilitation 2008 1 2 182 92
  3. [69]Pallavicini F Algeri D Repetto C Gorini A Riva G Biofeedback, virtual reality and mobile phones in the treatment of Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD): A phase-2 controlled clinical trial Journal of Cybertherapy and Rehabiliation 2009 2 4 315 27

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gaggioli, A., Pallavicini, F., Morganti, L., Serino, S., Scaratti, C., Briguglio, M., Crifaci, G., Vetrano, N., Giulintano, A., Bernava, G., Tartarisco, G., Pioggia, G., Raspelli, S., Cipresso, P., Vigna, C., Grassi, A., Baruffi, M., Wiederhold, B., & Riva, G.
Affiliations
  • Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
  • IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano (IT)
  • National Research Council (IT)
  • Virtual Reality Medical Institute (BE)
Corresponding author
Gaggioli, Andrea
Venue
Journal of Medical Internet Research
Published
2014-07-08
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
e167
ISSN
1438-8871 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127512944
Cited by
164
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
11.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • BOA (University of Milano-Bicocca) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PubliCatt (Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
European Commission (247685)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
Keywords
virtual reality, psychological stress management, real-time monitoring, wearable biosensors, smartphone-based monitoring, coping strategies, trait anxiety, teachers, nurses, occupational stress, cognitive behavioral therapy, stress management training, virtual worlds, emotional support, self-efficacy, post-traumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorders, exposure therapy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Faculty, Female, Humans, Male, Nurses, Stress, Psychological, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Virtual Reality Exposure Therapy, Visual Analog Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review