Cited by 610Mesenchymal stem cell researchHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLiver physiology and pathology

Human mesenchymal stem cells xenografted directly to rat liver are differentiated into human hepatocytes without fusion

Sato, Yasushi, Araki, Hironobu, Kato, Junji, Nakamura, Kiminori, Kawano, Yutaka, Kobune, Masayoshi, Sato, Tsutomu, Miyanishi, Koji +9 more·2005·Blood

Abstract

Hepatic transdifferentiation of bone marrow cells has been previously demonstrated by intravenous administration of donor cells, which may recirculate to the liver after undergoing proliferation and differentiation in the recipient's bone marrow. In the present study, to elucidate which cellular components of human bone marrow more potently differentiate into hepatocytes, we fractionated human bone marrow cells into mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), CD34+ cells, and non-MSCs/CD34- cells and examined them by directly xenografting to allylalcohol (AA)-treated rat liver. Hepatocyte-like cells, as revealed by positive immunostaining for human-specific alpha-fetoprotein (AFP), albumin (Alb), cytokeratin 19 (CK19), cytokeratin 18 (CK18), and asialoglycoprotein receptor (AGPR), and by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) for expression of AFP and Alb mRNA, were observed only in recipient livers with MSC fractions. Cell fusion was not likely involved since both human and rat chromosomes were independently identified by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The differentiation appeared to follow the process of hepatic ontogeny, reprogramming of gene expression in the genome of MSCs, as evidenced by expression of the AFP gene at an early stage and the albumin gene at a later stage. In conclusion, we have demonstrated that MSCs are the most potent component in hepatic differentiation, as revealed by directly xenografting into rat livers. (Blood. 2005;106:756-763)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood-2005-02-0572

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sato, Y., Araki, H., Kato, J., Nakamura, K., Kawano, Y., Kobune, M., Sato, T., Miyanishi, K., Takayama, T., Takahashi, M., Takimoto, R., Iyama, S., Matsunaga, T., Ohtani, S., Matsuura, A., Hamada, H., & Niitsu, Y.
Affiliations
Sapporo Medical University (JP)
Venue
Blood
Published
2005-07-15
Volume
106
Issue
2
Pages
756-763
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W2161820725
Cited by
610
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 47 · 2013: 53 · 2012: 51
FWCI
20.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics › Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
mesenchymal stem cells, hepatocyte differentiation, bone marrow cells, xenotransplantation, cell fusion, alpha-fetoprotein, albumin, cytokeratin, asialoglycoprotein receptor, gene expression reprogramming, CD34+ cells
MeSH terms
Albumins, alpha-Fetoproteins, Animals, Cell Count, Cell Differentiation, Female, Humans, Immunohistochemistry, Keratins, Liver, Membrane Fusion, RNA, Messenger, Transplantation, Heterologous, Gene Expression, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Antigens, CD34, Hepatocytes, Asialoglycoprotein Receptor, Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation, Rats, Mesenchymal Stem Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review