Cited by 112Acute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchCancer Genomics and DiagnosticsCancer-related Molecular Pathways

TP53 copy number and protein expression inform mutation status across risk categories in acute myeloid leukemia

Open access
Tashakori, Mehrnoosh, Kadia, Tapan, Loghavi, Sanam, Daver, Naval, Kanagal-Shamanna, Rashmi, Pierce, Sherry, Sui, Dawen, Wei, Peng +10 more·2022·Blood

Abstract

Mutant TP53 is an adverse risk factor in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but large-scale integrated genomic-proteomic analyses of TP53 alterations in patients with AML remain limited. We analyzed TP53 mutational status, copy number (CN), and protein expression data in AML (N = 528) and provide a compilation of mutation sites and types across disease subgroups among treated and untreated patients. Our analysis shows differential hotspots in subsets of AML and uncovers novel pathogenic variants involving TP53 splice sites. In addition, we identified TP53 CN loss in 70.2% of TP53-mutated AML cases, which have more deleterious TP53 mutations, as well as copy neutral loss of heterozygosity in 5/32 (15.6%) AML patients who had intact TP53 CN. Importantly, we demonstrate that mutant p53 protein expression patterns by immunohistochemistry evaluated using digital image-assisted analysis provide a robust readout that integrates TP53 mutation and allelic states in patients with AML. Expression of p53 by immunohistochemistry informed mutation status irrespective of TP53 CN status. Genomic analysis of comutations in TP53-mutant AML shows a muted landscape encompassing primarily mutations in genes involved in epigenetic regulation (DNMT3A and TET2), RAS/MAPK signaling (NF1, KRAS/NRAS, PTPN11), and RNA splicing (SRSF2). In summary, our data provide a rationale to refine risk stratification of patients with AML on the basis of integrated molecular and protein-level TP53 analyses.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1182/blood.2021013983

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a strong interplay between VAF, allelic state, and cytogenetic complexity predicting outcomes in mTP53 MDS/AML.

    “there is a very strong interplay between VAF, allelic state, and cytogenetic complexity strongly predicting outcomes in this molecular subset”

    From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Results section’s outcome analysis reports that TP53 VAF, number of TP53 mutations, and cytogenetic risk independently correlated with overall survival in frontline TP53-mutated AML; TP53 copy-number loss was associated with worse survival among patients with one TP53 mutation. It does not establish a strong three-way interplay among VAF, allelic state, and cytogenetic complexity, and its outcome analysis concerns AML rather than MDS/AML broadly (page not available in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • A recent study identified 92% of TP53 mutant MDS/AML patients to represent a poor risk population.

    “with a recent study identifying 92% of TP53 mutant MDS/AML patients to represent a poor risk population.”

    From Long‐term follow‐up and combined Phase 2 results of eprenetapopt and azacitidine in patients with <i>TP53</i> mutant MDS/AML (2025) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Introduction describes TP53-mutated AML as an adverse-risk category. But the study group was patients with AML, not a combined MDS/AML population, and the 92.5% reported in Methods refers to myelodysplasia-related cytogenetics among patients with AML-MRC—not the proportion of TP53-mutant patients at poor risk. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tashakori, M., Kadia, T., Loghavi, S., Daver, N., Kanagal-Shamanna, R., Pierce, S., Sui, D., Wei, P., Khodakarami, F., Tang, Z., Routbort, M., Bivins, C. A., Jabbour, E. J., Medeiros, L. J., Bhalla, K., Kantarjian, H. M., Ravandi, F., & Khoury, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • 3Department of Leukemia, and
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (US)
  • 1Department of Hematopathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX;
  • 5Cyclica Inc, Toronto, ON, Canada
Corresponding author
Khoury, Joseph D.
Venue
Blood
Published
2022-07-07
Volume
140
Issue
1
Pages
58-72
ISSN
  • 0006-4971 (ISSN-L)
  • 1528-0020
OpenAlex
W4226526247
Cited by
111
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 12
FWCI
17.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Blood (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons-TMC (Texas Medical Center) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Acute Myeloid Leukemia Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
Keywords
acute myeloid leukemia, TP53 mutation, p53 expression, immunohistochemistry, copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity, co-occurring mutations, DNMT3A, TET2, RAS/MAPK pathway, SRSF2, risk stratification
MeSH terms
Humans, Mutation, Prognosis, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute, Tumor Suppressor Protein p53, Proteomics, Epigenesis, Genetic, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review