Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 99Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchCardiovascular and exercise physiologyRespiratory and Cough-Related Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 44 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 26 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Mechanisms of exertional dyspnoea in symptomatic smokers without COPD

Open access

Abstract

Dyspnoea and activity limitation can occur in smokers who do not meet spirometric criteria for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but the underlying mechanisms are unknown. Detailed pulmonary function tests and sensory–mechanical relationships during incremental exercise with respiratory pressure measurements and diaphragmatic electromyography (EMG di ) were compared in 20 smokers without spirometric COPD and 20 age-matched healthy controls. Smokers (mean± sd post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV 1 )/forced vital capacity 75±4%, mean± sd FEV 1 104±14% predicted) had greater activity-related dyspnoea, poorer health status and lower physical activity than controls. Smokers had peripheral airway dysfunction: higher phase-III nitrogen slopes (3.8±1.8 versus 2.6±1.1%·L −1 ) and airway resistance (difference between airway resistance measured at 5 Hz and 20 Hz 19±11 versus 12±7% at 5 Hz) than controls (p<0.05). Smokers had significantly (p<0.05) lower peak oxygen uptake (78±40 versus 107±45% predicted) and ventilation (61±26 versus 97±29 L·min −1 ). Exercise ventilatory requirements, operating lung volumes and cardio-circulatory responses were similar. However, submaximal dyspnoea ratings, resistive and total work of breathing were increased in smokers compared with controls (p<0.05); diaphragmatic effort (transdiaphragmatic pressure/maximumal transdiaphragmatic pressure) and fractional inspiratory neural drive to the diaphragm (EMG di /maximal EMG di ) were also increased (p<0.05) mainly reflecting the reduced denominator. Symptomatic smokers at risk for COPD had greater exertional dyspnoea and lower exercise tolerance compared with healthy controls in association with greater airways resistance, contractile diaphragmatic effort and fractional inspiratory neural drive to the diaphragm.

Overview

CoChat Summary

TL;DR

Symptomatic smokers without spirometric COPD had greater exertional dyspnoea and lower exercise tolerance than age-matched healthy controls, despite similar ventilatory requirements and operating lung volumes. The findings link their dyspnoea to peripheral airway dysfunction, greater resistive work of breathing, higher diaphragmatic effort, and increased fractional inspiratory neural drive to the diaphragm.

Key findings

  • Smokers (n=20) had post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC 75±4% and FEV1 104±14% predicted, with greater activity-related dyspnoea, poorer health status, and lower physical activity than controls; they also showed peripheral airway dysfunction, including higher phase-III nitrogen slope (3.8±1.8 versus 2.6±1.1%·L⁻¹) and higher R5–20 (19±11 versus 12±7% at 5 Hz) (p<0.05).
  • At peak exercise, smokers had lower peak oxygen uptake (78±40 versus 107±45% predicted) and ventilation (61±26 versus 97±29 L·min⁻¹), while ventilatory requirements, operating lung volumes, and cardio-circulatory responses were similar; at 80 W, dyspnoea was 1.9 Borg units higher, and dyspnoea–ventilation slopes were greater (0.108±0.05 versus 0.067±0.04 Borg units·L⁻¹·min⁻¹, p=0.008).
  • Submaximal resistive and total work of breathing were increased in smokers, as were Pdi/Pdi,max and EMGdi/EMGdi,max, mainly reflecting a reduced denominator; EMGdi,max during the highest inspiratory capacity was lower in smokers (113±65 versus 165±56 µV, p=0.028).
  • Dyspnoea intensity correlated with EMGdi/EMGdi,max (partial R²=0.67, p<0.0005) and inspiratory Pdi/Pdi,max (partial R²=0.61, p<0.0005), with similar relationships across groups.

Methods

  • Cross-sectional study of 20 symptomatic current or ex-smokers without spirometric COPD (post-bronchodilator FEV1 >80% predicted, FEV1/FVC >0.7 and above lower limit of normal; age ≥40 years; ≥20 pack-years) and 20 age-matched healthy non-smoking controls.
  • Participants completed questionnaires, pre- and post-bronchodilator pulmonary function tests, small airway tests (single-breath nitrogen washout and impulse oscillometry), and incremental cycle cardiopulmonary exercise testing with respiratory pressure measurements and diaphragmatic electromyography (EMGdi); 14 subjects per group accepted the EMGdi/pressure catheter.
  • Between-group comparisons used unpaired t-tests at rest, iso-work rates, and peak exercise; multivariable linear regression evaluated dyspnoea intensity against EMGdi/EMGdi,max and inspiratory Pdi/Pdi,max, with group, interaction, and subject random effects.

Limitations

  • Stated: not all subjects consented to EMGdi and respiratory pressure measurements because of invasiveness, though the n=14 subgroup was sufficient to detect differences; results cannot be generalised to asymptomatic smokers; EMGdi measured only the crural diaphragm, so ribcage and accessory muscle activity could not be assessed.
  • Stated in discussion: the skeletal muscle deconditioning hypothesis for greater leg discomfort was not formally tested.
  • Evident from the text: the cross-sectional design cannot establish causality, and the modest sample size (20 per group; 14 per group for EMGdi) limits broader generalisability.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1183/13993003.00077-2016

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 Valid · 0 Not valid · 17 Not checked · 86 Own results and interpretations

73 more claims

Create a free account to see all 103 claims and to verify the 25 references still open.

See all claims — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 13
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 13

Create a free account to see these claims.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Brooks, 1982, Surveillance for respiratory hazards in the occupational setting, Am Rev Respir Dis, 126, 952

Cited by

See all 99

Metadata

Authors
Elbehairy, A. F., Guenette, J. A., Faisal, A., Ciavaglia, C. E., Webb, K. A., Jensen, D., Ramsook, A. H., Neder, J. A., & O'Donnell, D. E.
Affiliations
  • Queen's University (CA)
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
European Respiratory Journal
Published
2016-08-04
Volume
48
Issue
3
Pages
694-705
ISSN
  • 0903-1936 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-3003
OpenAlex
W2484791473
Cited by
99
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3
FWCI
8.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Respiratory Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ontario Thoracic Society
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • William Spear/Richard Start Endowment Fund, Queen's University, Canada
  • Canadian Lung Association (CLA)/Canadian Thoracic Society
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
Keywords
exertional dyspnea, smokers, COPD risk, airway resistance, work of breathing, diaphragm electromyography, exercise tolerance, peak oxygen uptake, health status
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Inhalation, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diaphragm, Dyspnea, Electromyography, Exercise Test, Female, Forced Expiratory Volume, Humans, Lung, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen, Phenotype, Respiration, Respiratory Function Tests, Risk, Smoking, Spirometry, Vital Capacity, Body Mass Index, Multivariate Analysis, Exercise Tolerance, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-13, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-13 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.