CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 719Diabetes Treatment and ManagementPharmacology and Obesity TreatmentDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 37 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exenatide effects on diabetes, obesity, cardiovascular risk factors and hepatic biomarkers in patients with type 2 diabetes treated for at least 3 years

Klonoff, David C., Buse, John B., Nielsen, Loretta L., Guan, Xuesong, Bowlus, Christopher L., Holcombe, John H., Wintle, Matthew E., Maggs, David G.·2008·Current Medical Research and Opinion
DOI 10.1185/030079908x253870
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Exenatide, an incretin mimetic for adjunctive treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2DM), reduced hemoglobin A(1c) (A1C) and weight in clinical trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of > or = 3 years exenatide therapy on glycemic control, body weight, cardiometabolic markers, and safety. METHODS: Patients from three placebo-controlled trials and their open-label extensions were enrolled into one open-ended, open-label clinical trial. Patients were randomized to twice daily (BID) placebo, 5 mug exenatide, or 10 mug exenatide for 30 weeks, followed by 5 mug exenatide BID for 4 weeks, then 10 mug exenatide BID for > or = 3 years of exenatide exposure. Patients continued metformin and/or sulfonylureas. RESULTS: 217 patients (64% male, age 58 +/- 10 years, weight 99 +/- 18 kg, BMI 34 +/- 5 kg/m(2), A1C 8.2 +/- 1.0% [mean +/- SD]) completed 3 years of exenatide exposure. Reductions in A1C from baseline to week 12 (-1.1 +/- 0.1% [mean +/- SEM]) were sustained to 3 years (-1.0 +/- 0.1%; p < 0.0001), with 46% achieving A1C < or = 7%. Exenatide progressively reduced body weight from baseline (-5.3 +/- 0.4 kg at 3 years; p < 0.0001). Patients with elevated serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at baseline (n = 116) had reduced ALT (-10.4 +/- 1.5 IU/L; p < 0.0001) and 41% achieved normal ALT. Patients with elevated ALT at baseline tended to lose more weight than patients with normal ALT at baseline (-6.1 +/- 0.6 kg vs. -4.4 +/- 0.5 kg; p = 0.03), however weight change was minimally correlated with baseline ALT (r = -0.01) or ALT change (r = 0.31). Homeostasis Model Assessment B (HOMA-B), blood pressure, and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) all improved. A subset achieved 3.5 years of exenatide exposure and had serum lipids available for analysis (n = 151). Triglycerides decreased 12% (p = 0.0003), total cholesterol decreased 5% (p = 0.0007), LDL-C decreased 6% (p < 0.0001), and HDL-C increased 24% (p < 0.0001). Exenatide was generally well tolerated. The most frequent adverse event was mild-to-moderate nausea. The main limitation of this study is the open-label, uncontrolled nature of the study design which does not provide a placebo group for comparison. CONCLUSION: Adjunctive exenatide treatment for > or = 3 years in T2DM patients resulted in sustained improvements in glycemic control, cardiovascular risk factors, and hepatic biomarkers, coupled with progressive weight reduction.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1185/030079908x253870

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 37 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 719

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Klonoff, D. C., Buse, J. B., Nielsen, L. L., Guan, X., Bowlus, C. L., Holcombe, J. H., Wintle, M. E., & Maggs, D. G.
Affiliations
  • Mills Peninsula Health Services (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Amylin Pharmaceuticals, Inc. San Diego, CAUSA
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Eli Lilly (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Nielsen, Loretta L.
ORCID
Venue
Current Medical Research and Opinion
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2007-12-03
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
275-286
ISSN
  • 0300-7995 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-4877
DOI
10.1185/030079908x253870
OpenAlex
W2070710390
Cited by
699
References
37
Citations by year
2025: 16 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 69 · 2012: 90
FWCI
49.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Medical Research and Opinion (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Pharmacology and Obesity Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
exenatide, GLP-1 receptor agonists, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, weight loss, obesity, cardiovascular risk factors, alanine aminotransferase, hepatic safety, long-term treatment, metformin, sulfonylureas, HOMA, LDL cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL/HDL ratio
MeSH terms
Exenatide, Aged, Blood Pressure, Body Weight, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Liver, Male, Middle Aged, Obesity, Peptides, Placebos, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Venoms, Biomarkers, Pharmacological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review