The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cognitive and memory training in adults at risk of dementia: A Systematic Review
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Effective non-pharmacological cognitive interventions to prevent Alzheimer's dementia or slow its progression are an urgent international priority. The aim of this review was to evaluate cognitive training trials in individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI), and evaluate the efficacy of training in memory strategies or cognitive exercises to determine if cognitive training could benefit individuals at risk of developing dementia. METHODS: A systematic review of eligible trials was undertaken, followed by effect size analysis. Cognitive training was differentiated from other cognitive interventions not meeting generally accepted definitions, and included both cognitive exercises and memory strategies. RESULTS: Ten studies enrolling a total of 305 subjects met criteria for cognitive training in MCI. Only five of the studies were randomized controlled trials. Meta-analysis was not considered appropriate due to the heterogeneity of interventions. Moderate effects on memory outcomes were identified in seven trials. Cognitive exercises (relative effect sizes ranged from .10 to 1.21) may lead to greater benefits than memory strategies (.88 to -1.18) on memory. CONCLUSIONS: Previous conclusions of a lack of efficacy for cognitive training in MCI may have been influenced by not clearly defining the intervention. Our systematic review found that cognitive exercises can produce moderate-to-large beneficial effects on memory-related outcomes. However, the number of high quality RCTs remains low, and so further trials must be a priority. Several suggestions for the better design of cognitive training trials are provided.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hao (2015) · doi:10.1002/14651858 · Cited by 11,321
Mild Cognitive Impairment: Clinical Characterization and Outcome
Petersen, R. C., Smith, G. E., Waring, S. C., Ivnik, R. J., Tangalos, E. G., & Kokmen, E. (1999) · Archives of Neurology · doi:10.1001/archneur.56.3.303 · Cited by 8,980
GPOWER: A general power analysis program
Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03203630 · Cited by 4,864
Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 1998 Through 2002
Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., Ellmo, W., Kalmar, K., Giacino, J. T., Harley, J. P., et al. (2005) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024 · Cited by 1,140
Improving memory performance in the aged through mnemonic training: a meta-analytic study.
Verhaeghen, P., Marcoen, A., & Goossens, L. (1992) · Psychology and Aging · doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.2.242 · Cited by 601
Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2003) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003260 · Cited by 576
Cited by
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care: 2020 report of the Lancet Commission
Livingston, G., Huntley, J., Sommerlad, A., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Brayne, C., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Cooper, C., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30367-6 · Cited by 10,430
“50 Computerised cognitive training programmes have increasingly replaced tasks that were originally paper-and-pencil format with computer-based tasks for practice and training.”
RetractedMild cognitive impairment: a concept in evolution
Petersen, R. C., Caracciolo, B., Brayne, C., Gauthier, S., Jelic, V., & Fratiglioni, L. (2014) · Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1111/joim.12190 · Cited by 1,694
Bahar-Fuchs, A., Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd003260.pub2 · Cited by 507
Fiatarone Singh, M. A., Gates, N., Saigal, N., Wilson, G. C., Meiklejohn, J., Brodaty, H., Wen, W., Singh, N., Baune, B. T., Suo, C., et al. (2014) · Journal of the American Medical Directors Association · doi:10.1016/j.jamda.2014.09.010 · Cited by 424
Self-citationCognitive training for people with mild to moderate dementia
Bahar-Fuchs, A., Martyr, A., Goh, A. M., Sabates, J., & Clare, L. (2019) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd013069.pub2 · Cited by 342
Coyle, H., Traynor, V., & Solowij, N. (2015) · The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.jagp.2014.04.009 · Cited by 274
Brummel, N. E., Girard, T. D., Ely, E. W., Pandharipande, P. P., Morandi, A., Hughes, C. G., Graves, A. J., Shintani, A., Murphy, E., Work, B., et al. (2014) · Intensive Care Medicine · doi:10.1007/s00134-013-3136-0 · Cited by 256
Bahar-Fuchs, A., Clare, L., & Woods, B. (2013) · Alzheimer's Research & Therapy · doi:10.1186/alzrt189 · Cited by 239
Aminov, A., Rogers, J. M., Middleton, S., Caeyenberghs, K., & Wilson, P. H. (2018) · Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1186/s12984-018-0370-2 · Cited by 236
Chandler, M. J., Parks, A. C., Marsiske, M., Rotblatt, L. J., & Smith, G. E. (2016) · Neuropsychology Review · doi:10.1007/s11065-016-9330-4 · Cited by 169
Diamond, K., Mowszowski, L., Cockayne, N., Norrie, L., Paradise, M., Hermens, D. F., Lewis, S. J. G., Hickie, I. B., & Naismith, S. L. (2015) · Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-142061 · Cited by 95
Nonpharmacologic Treatment and Prevention Strategies for Dementia
Yaffe, K., & Hoang, T. (2013) · Continuum · doi:10.1212/01.con.0000429178.14354.67 · Cited by 28
Bier, N., Grenier, S., Brodeur, C., Gauthier, S., Gilbert, B., Hudon, C., Lepage, É., Ouellet, M.-C., Viscogliosi, C., & Belleville, S. (2015) · International Psychogeriatrics · doi:10.1017/s1041610214001902 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Gates, N. J., Sachdev, P. S., Fiatarone Singh, M. A., & Valenzuela, M.
- Venue
- BMC Geriatrics
- Published
- 2011-09-25
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 55-55
- ISSN
- 1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2064307988
- Cited by
- 309
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 2.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
