Cited by 30Sexual function and dysfunction studiesCancer survivorship and careProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Improving sexual health in men with prostate cancer: randomised controlled trial of exercise and psychosexual therapies

Open access
Cormie, Prue, Chambers, Suzanne K, Newton, Robert U, Gardiner, Robert A, Spry, Nigel, Taaffe, Dennis R, Joseph, David, Hamid, M Akhlil +4 more·2014·BMC Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite being a critical survivorship care issue, there is a clear gap in current knowledge of the optimal treatment of sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer. There is sound theoretical rationale and emerging evidence that exercise may be an innovative therapy to counteract sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer. Furthermore, despite the multidimensional aetiology of sexual dysfunction, there is a paucity of research investigating the efficacy of integrated treatment models. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to: 1) examine the efficacy of exercise as a therapy to aid in the management of sexual dysfunction in men with prostate cancer; 2) determine if combining exercise and brief psychosexual intervention results in more pronounced improvements in sexual health; and 3) assess if any benefit of exercise and psychosexual intervention on sexual dysfunction is sustained long term. METHODS/DESIGN: A three-arm, multi-site randomised controlled trial involving 240 prostate cancer survivors will be implemented. Participants will be randomised to: 1) 'Exercise' intervention; 2) 'Exercise + Psychosexual' intervention; or 3) 'Usual Care'. The Exercise group will receive a 6-month, group based, supervised resistance and aerobic exercise intervention. The Exercise + Psychosexual group will receive the same exercise intervention plus a brief psychosexual self-management intervention that addresses psychological and sexual well-being. The Usual Care group will maintain standard care for 6 months. Measurements for primary and secondary endpoints will take place at baseline, 6 months (post-intervention) and 1 year follow-up. The primary endpoint is sexual health and secondary endpoints include key factors associated with sexual health in men with prostate cancer. DISCUSSION: Sexual dysfunction is one of the most prevalent and distressing consequences of prostate cancer. Despite this, very little is known about the management of sexual dysfunction and current health care services do not adequately meet sexual health needs of survivors. This project will examine the potential role of exercise in the management of sexual dysfunction and evaluate a potential best-practice management approach by integrating pharmacological, physiological and psychological treatment modalities to address the complex and multifaceted aetiology of sexual dysfunction following cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613001179729.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2407-14-199

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cormie, P., Chambers, S. K., Newton, R. U., Gardiner, R. A., Spry, N., Taaffe, D. R., Joseph, D., Hamid, M. A., Chong, P., Hughes, D., Hamilton, K., & Galvão, D. A.
Affiliations
  • Edith Cowan University (AU)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Cormie, Prue
Venue
BMC Cancer
Published
2014-03-18
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
199-199
ISSN
1471-2407 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2167818742
Cited by
30
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Bank (Australian Catholic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Australasian Journal of Paramedicine (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Online (University of Wollongong) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • NOVA (University of Newcastle Australia) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation
  • Movember Foundation
  • Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council (1067696)
  • Cancer Council Western Australia
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
prostate cancer, sexual dysfunction, sexual health, exercise therapy, prostate cancer survivors, survivorship care, long-term treatment efficacy
MeSH terms
Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Quality of Life, Self Care, Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Sexual Dysfunctions, Psychological, Reproductive Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review