Cited by 80Migration, Health and TraumaRacial and Ethnic Identity ResearchMental Health Treatment and Access

Perceived discrimination is associated with severity of positive and depression/anxiety symptoms in immigrants with psychosis: a cross-sectional study

Open access
Berg, Akiah O, Melle, Ingrid, Rossberg, Jan Ivar, Romm, Kristin Lie, Larsson, Sara, Lagerberg, Trine V, Andreassen, Ole A, Hauff, Edvard·2011·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Immigration status is a significant risk factor for psychotic disorders, and a number of studies have reported more severe positive and affective symptoms among immigrant and ethnic minority groups. We investigated if perceived discrimination was associated with the severity of these symptoms among immigrants in Norway with psychotic disorders. METHODS: Cross-sectional analyses of 90 immigrant patients (66% first-generation, 68% from Asia/Africa) in treatment for psychotic disorders were assessed for DSM-IV diagnoses with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM Disorders (SCID-I, sections A-E) and for present symptom severity by The Structured Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (SCI-PANSS). Perceived discrimination was assessed by a self-report questionnaire developed for the Immigrant Youth in Cultural Transition Study. RESULTS: Perceived discrimination correlated with positive psychotic (r=0.264, p<0.05) and depression/anxiety symptoms (r=0.282, p<0.01), but not negative, cognitive, or excitement symptoms. Perceived discrimination also functioned as a partial mediator for symptom severity in African immigrants. Multiple linear regression analyses controlling for possible confounders revealed that perceived discrimination explained approximately 10% of the variance in positive and depression/anxiety symptoms in the statistical model. CONCLUSIONS: Among immigrants with psychotic disorders, visible minority status was associated with perceived discrimination and with more severe positive and depression/anxiety symptoms. These results suggest that context-specific stressful environmental factors influence specific symptom patterns and severity. This has important implications for preventive strategies and treatment of this vulnerable patient group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-11-77

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Perceptions of overt discrimination were associated with lower positive affect experienced by Korean immigrants in Toronto, whereas perceptions of subtle discrimination were associated with depressive symptoms.

    “The results show that perceptions of overt discrimination were associated with lower positive affect experienced by the immigrants, whereas perceptions of subtle discrimination were associated with depressive symptoms (see also Berg et al. 2011).”

    From Prejudice and Discrimination Toward Immigrants (2021) · cites this paper as Berg et al. 2011

    The Discussion (page not available) reports an association between perceived discrimination and more severe depression/anxiety symptoms among immigrants with psychosis. The study concerns immigrants in Norway, not Korean immigrants in Toronto, and does not distinguish overt from subtle discrimination or report lower positive affect; its “positive symptoms” are psychotic symptoms. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Berg, A. O., Melle, I., Rossberg, J. I., Romm, K. L., Larsson, S., Lagerberg, T. V., Andreassen, O. A., & Hauff, E.
Affiliations
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Berg, Akiah O
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2011-05-06
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
77-77
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053226768
Cited by
80
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
6.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Universitetet i Oslo
  • Norges Forskningsråd (167153)
  • Diakonhjemmet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Migration, Health and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
perceived discrimination, psychosis, immigrants, ethnic minorities, positive psychotic symptoms, depression, anxiety, symptom severity, visible minority status, African immigrants, Asian immigrants, immigrant youth
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Prejudice, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychotic Disorders, Social Perception, Emigrants and Immigrants, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review