Cited by 42Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Group cognitive behavior therapy for Japanese patients with social anxiety disorder: preliminary outcomes and their predictors

Open access
Chen, Junwen, Nakano, Yumi, Ietzugu, Tetsuji, Ogawa, Sei, Funayama, Tadashi, Watanabe, Norio, Noda, Yumiko, Furukawa, Toshi A·2007·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

Background: A number of studies have provided strong evidence for the use of cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) in the treatment of social anxiety disorder (SAD). However, all of the previous reports were from Europe and North America and it is unknown whether Western psychological therapies are effective for SAD in non-Western cultures. The present pilot study aimed to evaluate CBT program for SAD which was originally developed for Western patients, among Japanese patients. Methods: Fifty-seven outpatients who participated in group CBT for SAD were evaluated using eight self-reported and one clinician-administered questionnaires to measure various aspects of SAD symptomatology at the beginning and at the end of the program. Pre- and post-treatment scores were compared and the magnitude of treatment effect was quantified as well based once on the intention-to-treat (ITT) and once among the completers only. We also examined baseline predictors of the CBT outcomes. Results: Seven patients (12%) did not complete the program. For the ITT sample, the percentage of reduction was 20% to 30% and the pre to post treatment effect sizes ranged from 0.37 to 1.01. Among the completers, the respective figures were 20% to 33% and 0.41 to 1.19. We found no significant pretreatment predictor of the outcomes. Conclusion: Group CBT for SAD is acceptable and can bring about a similar degree of symptom reduction among Japanese patients with SAD as among Western patients.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-244x-7-69

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the current study, ACT and CBT produced similar rates of clinically significant improvement, comparable to published mean response rates for CBT for social phobia: 46% at post-treatment and 52.9% at follow-up.

    “In the current study, ACT and CBT produced similar rates of clinically significant improvement, that were comparable to published mean response rates for CBT for social phobia: 46% at post-treatment (12 studies, 29 data points) and 52.9% at follow-up (3 studies, 10 data points)”

    From Randomized controlled trial of cognitive behavioral therapy and acceptance and commitment therapy for social phobia: Outcomes and moderators (2014) · cites this paper as Chen et al., 2007

    The Discussion says the group CBT outcomes were comparable to Western reports, which supports the general comparison. But the Results report this study’s post-treatment response rates as 33.3% (intention-to-treat) and 38.0% (completers); our copy does not report published mean response rates of 46% at post-treatment or 52.9% at follow-up, or the stated study and data-point counts. The paper did not compare ACT with CBT; that comparison appears to be the citing authors’ own result. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • To our knowledge, only one other study examined extraversion as a predictor of behavioral treatment in a social phobia sample, with null results.

    “To our knowledge, only one other study examined extraversion as a predictor of behavioral treatment in a social phobia sample, with null results (Chen et al., 2007).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Kessler RC Berglund P Demler O Jin R Walters EE Lifetime prevalence and age-of-onset distributions of DSM-IV disorders in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication Arch Gen Psychiatry 2005 62 593 602 15939837 10.1001/archpsyc.62.6.593 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Clark DM Wells A Heimberg RG, Liebowitz M, Hope DA, Schneier FR A cognitive model of social phobia Social Phobia: Diagnosis, assessment and treatment 1995 New York, Guilford Press 69 93
  3. Feske U Chambless DL Cognitive behavioral versus exposure only treatment for social phobia: a meta-analysis Behavior Therapy 1995 26 695 720 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80040-1 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Taylor S Meta-analysis of cognitive-behavioral treatments for social phobia J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 1996 27 1 9 8814516 10.1016/0005-7916(95)00058-5 · DOI
  5. Liebowitz MR Heimberg RG Schneier FR Hope DA Davies S Holt CS Goetz D Juster HR Lin SH Bruch MA Marshall RD Klein DF Cognitive-behavioral group therapy versus phenelzine in social phobia: long-term outcome Depress Anxiety 1999 10 89 98 10604081 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6394(1999)10:3<89::AID-DA1>3.0.CO;2-5 · DOI
  6. American Psychiatric Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition 1994 Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Association
  7. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JB Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders 1997 Washington, D.C., American Psychiatric Press
  8. Andrews G Creamer M Crino R Hunt C Lampe L Page A The Treatment of Anxiety Disorders: Clinician Guides and Patient Manuals 2002 2nd Sydney, Cambridge University Press
  9. Blomhoff S Haug TT Hellstrom K Holme I Humble M Madsbu HP Wold JE Randomised controlled general practice trial of sertraline, exposure therapy and combined treatment in generalised social phobia Br J Psychiatry 2001 179 23 30 11435264 10.1192/bjp.179.1.23 · DOI
  10. Mattick RP Clarke JC Development and validation of measures of social phobia scrutiny fear and social interaction anxiety Behav Res Ther 1998 36 455 470 9670605 10.1016/S0005-7967(97)10031-6 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Marks IM Mathews AM Brief standard self-rating for phobic patients Behav Res Ther 1979 17 263 267 526242 10.1016/0005-7967(79)90041-X · DOI · Paper page
  12. Watson D Friend R Measurement of social-evaluative anxiety J Consult Clin Psychol 1969 33 448 457 5810590 10.1037/h0027806 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Collins KA Westra HA Dozois DJ Stewart SH The validity of the brief version of the Fear of Negative Evaluation Scale J Anxiety Disord 2005 19 345 359 15686861 10.1016/j.janxdis.2004.02.003 · DOI
  14. Yoshimura K Ono Y Nakamura K Nathan JH Suzuki K Validation of the Japanese version of the NEO Five-Factor Inventory in a large community sample Psychol Rep 2001 88 443 449 11351886 10.2466/PR0.88.2.443-449 · DOI
  15. Kleinknecht RA Dinnel DL Kleinknecht EE Hiruma N Harada N Cultural factors in social anxiety: a comparison of social phobia symptoms and Taijin Kyofusho J Anxiety Disord 1997 11 157 177 9168340 10.1016/S0887-6185(97)00004-2 · DOI
  16. Stangier U Heidenreich T Peitz M Lauterbach W Clark DM Cognitive therapy for social phobia: individual versus group treatment Behav Res Ther 2003 41 991 1007 12914803 10.1016/S0005-7967(02)00176-6 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Mortberg E Clark DM Sundin O Aberg Wistedt A Intensive group cognitive treatment and individual cognitive therapy vs. treatment as usual in social phobia: a randomized controlled trial Acta Psychiatr Scand 2007 115 142 154 17244178 10.1111/j.1600-0447.2006.00839.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Scholing A Emmelkamp PM Prediction of treatment outcome in social phobia: a cross-validation Behav Res Ther 1999 37 659 670 10402691 10.1016/S0005-7967(98)00175-2 · DOI
  19. Rosser S Erskine A Crino R Pre-existing antidepressants and the outcome of group cognitive behaviour therapy for social phobia Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2004 38 233 239 15038802 10.1111/j.1440-1614.2004.01345.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, J., Nakano, Y., Ietzugu, T., Ogawa, S., Funayama, T., Watanabe, N., Noda, Y., & Furukawa, T. A.
Affiliations
Nagoya City University (JP)
Corresponding author
Furukawa, Toshi A
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2007-12
Volume
7
Issue
1
Pages
69-69
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042611991
Cited by
42
References
9
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
3.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
  • ANU Open Research (Australian National University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Nagoya City University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
social anxiety disorder, group cognitive behavioral therapy, Japanese patients, predictors of treatment outcome, symptom relief, outpatients
MeSH terms
Adult, Ambulatory Care, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Personality Assessment, Personality Inventory, Phobic Disorders, Psychotherapy, Group, Surveys and Questionnaires, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review