Cited by 36Racial and Ethnic Identity ResearchHealth disparities and outcomesCardiac Imaging and Diagnostics

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 1 are not checked yet.

Self-reported racial discrimination, response to unfair treatment, and coronary calcification in asymptomatic adults - the North Texas Healthy Heart study

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accruing evidence supports the hypothesis that psychosocial factors are related to cardiovascular disease. However, a limited number of studies have investigated the pathophysiologic pathways through which these associations occur. The purpose of this study was to assess whether experiences of self-reported racial discrimination and reactions to unfair treatment were associated with coronary artery calcification (CAC), an indicator of subclinical coronary heart disease (CHD). METHODS: This cross-sectional study recruited 571 subjects (45 years and older) who were asymptomatic of CHD from Fort Worth, Texas from 2006 to 2008. Subjects completed a questionnaire, a multi-slice computed tomography scan to assess for CAC presence (measured as Agatston score >0), and serum chemistries. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the association between self-reported discrimination and CAC. Results were stratified by response to unfair treatment as it was found to significantly modify the relationship between discrimination and CAC. RESULTS: Among those who passively responded to unfair treatment, the odds of having CAC present were approximately 3 times higher for those experiencing discrimination (OR, 2.95; 95% CI, 1.19-7.32) after adjusting for age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, body mass index, hyperlipidemia, smoking status, hypertension, diabetes, and first degree relative with heart disease. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first multi-racial/ethnic study to find racial discrimination associated with CAC, which differs based on how one responds to unfair treatment.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-10-285

Cites

41 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Parker H, Botha JL, Haslam C: "Racism" as a variable in health research - can it be measureed?. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994, 48: 522-

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cardarelli, R., Cardarelli, K. M., Fulda, K. G., Espinoza, A., Cage, C., Vishwanatha, J., Young, R., Steele, D. N., & Carroll, J.
Affiliations
  • University of North Texas Health Science Center (US)
  • John Peter Smith Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Cardarelli, Roberto
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2010-05-27
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
285-285
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2129765655
Cited by
36
References
42
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
6.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of North Texas
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Center on Minority Health and Health Disparities
  • National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities (P20MD001633, P20MD006882)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
Keywords
racial discrimination, coronary artery calcification, psychosocial stress, passive coping, cardiovascular risk, asymptomatic adults, racial and ethnic disparities
MeSH terms
Aged, Black or African American, Calcinosis, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Cardiomyopathies, Prejudice, Regression Analysis, Texas, Tomography, X-Ray Computed, Odds Ratio, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review