Cited by 119Diabetes Management and EducationChronic Disease Management StrategiesNursing care and research

The over time development of chronic illness self-management patterns: a longitudinal qualitative study

Open access
Audulv, Åsa·2013·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There currently exists a vast amount of literature concerning chronic illness self-management, however the developmental patterns and sustainability of self-management over time remain largely unknown. This paper aims to describe the patterns by which different chronic illness self-management behaviors develop and are maintained over time. METHOD: Twenty-one individuals newly diagnosed with chronic illnesses (e.g., diabetes, rheumatism, ischemic heart disease, multiple sclerosis, chronic renal disease, inflammatory bowel disease) were repeatedly interviewed over two-and-a-half years. The interviews were conducted in Sweden from 2006 to 2008. A total of 81 narrative interviews were analyzed with an interpretive description approach. RESULTS: The participants' self-management behaviors could be described in four different developmental patterns: consistent, episodic, on demand, and transitional. The developmental patterns were related to specific self-management behaviors. Most participants took long-term medications in a consistent pattern, whereas exercise was often performed according to an episodic pattern. Participants managed health crises (e.g., angina, pain episodes) according to an on demand pattern and everyday changes due to illness (e.g., adaptation of work and household activities) according to a transitional pattern. All of the participants used more than one self-management pattern. CONCLUSION: The findings show that self-management does not develop as one uniform pattern. Instead different self-management behaviors are enacted in different patterns. Therefore, it is likely that self-management activities require support strategies tailored to each behavior's developmental pattern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-13-452

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative work demonstrates how self-management needs change with time, particularly once clients return home and the focus on medical management diminishes.

    “Qualitative work by Satink et al [80], Audulv et al [81], Audulv [82], and others demonstrates how self-management needs change with time, particularly once clients return home and the focus on medical management diminishes.”

    From Features of Structured, One-to-One Videoconference Interventions That Actively Engage People in the Management of Their Chronic Conditions: Scoping Review (2025) · cites this paper as [82]

    The Results (A transitional self-management pattern; page not supplied) describe participants’ needs and self-management focus changing over time. The paper does not establish that this change occurs particularly after clients return home or that medical management then diminishes; those qualifications are not supported by the cited passages. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Douglas Scott S Self-management and the voluntary sector: The Scottish experience International Conference on Support for Self-Management of Health: 11–13 May 2010 Stirling, Scotland: Alliance for Self Care Research
  2. de Silva D Helping people help themselves: A review of the evidence considering whether it is worthwhile to support self-management 2011 London: The Health Foundation

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Audulv, Å.
Affiliations
Mid Sweden University (SE)
Corresponding author
Audulv, Åsa
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2013-05-07
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
452-452
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2123330798
Cited by
119
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
6.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Diva portal (Dalarna University Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Mittuniversitetet
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
chronic disease self-management, medication adherence, exercise behavior, health crisis, adaptation to illness, diabetes mellitus, multiple sclerosis, ischemic heart disease, chronic kidney disease, inflammatory bowel disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Continuity of Patient Care, Female, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Self Care, Sweden, Time Factors, Health Behavior, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review