Cited by 40Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Effect evaluation of a two-year complex intervention to reduce loneliness in non-institutionalised elderly Dutch people

Open access
Honigh-de Vlaming, Rianne, Haveman-Nies, Annemien, Heinrich, Judith, van‵t Veer, Pieter, de Groot, Lisette CPGM·2013·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Public health policy calls for intervention programmes to reduce loneliness in the ageing population. So far, numerous loneliness interventions have been developed, with effectiveness demonstrated for few of these interventions. The loneliness intervention described in this manuscript distinguishes itself from others by including multiple intervention components and targeting individuals and their environment. Intervention components included a mass media campaign, information meetings, psychosocial group courses, social activities organised by neighbours, and training of intermediaries. The aim of this manuscript is to study the effects of this integrated approach on initial and long-term outcomes. METHODS: A quasi-experimental pre-test post-test intervention study was conducted among non-institutionalised elderly people aged 65 years and over to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention by comparing the intervention community and the control community. Data on outputs, initial and long-term outcomes, and the overall goal were collected by self-administered questionnaires. Data of 858 elderly people were available for the analyses. To assess the effect linear regression analyses with adjustments for age, gender, church attendance, and mental health were used. In addition, the process evaluation provided information about the reach of the intervention components. RESULTS: After two years, 39% of the elderly people were familiar with the intervention programme. The intervention group scored more favourably than the control group on three subscales of the initial outcome, motivation (-4.4%, 95% CI-8.3--0.7), perceived social support (-8.2%, 95% CI-13.6--2.4), and subjective norm (-11.5%, 95% CI-17.4--5.4). However, no overall effects were observed for the long-term outcome, social support, and overall goal, loneliness. CONCLUSIONS: Two years after its initiation the reach of the intervention programme was modest. Though no effect of the complex intervention was found on social support and loneliness, more favourable scores on loneliness literacy subscales were induced.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-13-984

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The TDF was extended to be relevant to other areas in which changing behaviour is important such as changing patient behaviours.

    “In addition to understanding health professional behaviour, the TDF was extended to be relevant to other areas in which changing behaviour is important such as changing patient behaviours.”

    From A guide to using the Theoretical Domains Framework of behaviour change to investigate implementation problems (2017) · cites this paper as [19]

    The Methods (Logic Model; page unavailable) describes behavioural determinants for an intervention targeting loneliness in elderly people, but does not discuss the TDF or its extension beyond health-professional behaviour. Searches for the Theoretical Domains Framework, health-professional behaviour and patient behaviours found no passage addressing the claimed extension. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

34 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rowland DT Powell J, Chen S Community change Population aging. the transformation of societies, Volume 3 2012 Netherlands: Springer Science + Business Media B.V.; International Perspectives on Aging 91 104
  2. Bartholomew KL Parcel GS Kok GJ Gottlieb NH Ferándeze ME Bartholomew KL, Parcel GS, Kok GJ, Gottlieb NH, Fernándeze ME Chapter two: behavior-oriented theories used in health promotion Planning health promotion programs: an intervention mapping approach, Volume 3 2011 San Francisco, USA: Jossey-Bass 51 112
  3. Van Tilburg TG De Jong GJ Cesuurbepaling van de eenzaamheidsschaal [cutting scores on the De Jong Gierveld loneliness scale] Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr 1999 13 4 158 163 10486620

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Honigh-de Vlaming, R., Haveman-Nies, A., Heinrich, J., van‵t Veer, P., & de Groot, L. C.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2013-10-21
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
984-984
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2117413323
Cited by
40
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • ZonMw
  • Wageningen University and Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, complex interventions, social support, mass media campaigns, community-based intervention, intervention effectiveness, process evaluation, population aging
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Health Services for the Aged, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Motivation, Netherlands, Perception, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Program Evaluation, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review