Cited by 171Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSurvey Methodology and NonresponseAlcohol Consumption and Health Effects

Drinking pattern is more strongly associated with under-reporting of alcohol consumption than socio-demographic factors: evidence from a mixed-methods study

Open access
Boniface, Sadie, Kneale, James, Shelton, Nicola·2014·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Under-reporting of alcohol consumption is widespread; surveys typically capture 40-60% of alcohol sales. However the population distribution of under-reporting is not well understood. METHODS: Mixed-methods study to identify factors associated with under-reporting, using the nationally-representative Health Survey for England (HSE) 2011 (overall response rate 66%). Comparison of retrospective computer-assisted personal interview and seven-day drinking diary (n = 3,774 adults 18+, 50% women, diary response rate 69%) to identify factors associated with diary responses exceeding those of the interview using multivariable linear regression for three outcomes: drinking days in the week recorded, volume consumed on heaviest drinking day in the week recorded, and weekly alcohol consumption. Qualitative semi-structured interviews (n = 10) explored reasons for under-reporting in further detail. RESULTS: Number of drinking days was slightly greater in the diary than the interview (P < 0.001). Reported consumption was higher in the diary than in the interview for heaviest drinking day in the week recorded (0.7 units greater among men, 1.2 units among women, P < 0.001), and weekly alcohol consumption in women only (1.1 units among women, P = 0.003). Participants who drank more frequently, more heavily, and had a more varied drinking pattern with respect to the types of drink consumed or choice of drinking venues had a larger difference between their diary week and their interview week.The qualitative interviews identified having a non-routine drinking pattern, self-perception as a non-frequent drinker, and usually tracking drinking using experiential approaches as linked to more drinking being reported in the diary than the retrospective interview. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy drinking and non-routine drinking patterns may be associated with greater under-reporting of alcohol consumption. Estimates of drinking above recommended levels are likely to be disproportionately under-estimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1471-2458-14-1297

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The observed decline in AUD may be partly explained by self-underreporting of alcohol consumption, especially during the pandemic, when limited healthcare access, heightened stigma in remote surveys, and disruptions in data collection likely played a role.

    “This may partly explain the observed decline in AUD in our findings, especially during the pandemic, when limited healthcare access, heightened stigma in remote surveys, and disruptions in data collection likely played a role [44].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 32 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]Johnson TP FM Sudman S Wislar J Severns E An experiment to improve drug use reports during survey interviews Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods 1998 Alexandria, VA American Statistical Association 888 893
  2. [31]Boniface S Fuller E Mindell J Craig R Chapter 7: drinking diary Health Survey for England 2011 Volume 1: Health, social care, and lifestyles 2012 Leeds NHS Information Centre for Health and Social Care
  3. The pre-publication history for this paper can be accessed here: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2458/14/1297/prepub

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boniface, S., Kneale, J., & Shelton, N.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Boniface, Sadie
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2014-12
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
1297-1297
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1804495225
Cited by
171
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 5
FWCI
6.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Alcohol Consumption and Health Effects
Keywords
drinking patterns, heavy drinking, retrospective self-report, weekly alcohol consumption, drinking venues
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Alcohol Drinking, Cross-Sectional Studies, England, Female, Health Surveys, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Retrospective Studies, Self Concept, Socioeconomic Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review