Cited by 295Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceBlood Pressure and Hypertension Studies

Mobile Phone Text Messages to Support Treatment Adherence in Adults With High Blood Pressure (SMS-Text Adherence Support [StAR]): A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial

Open access
Bobrow, Kirsten, Farmer, Andrew J., Springer, David, Shanyinde, Milensu, Yu, Ly-Mee, Brennan, Thomas, Rayner, Brian, Namane, Mosedi +3 more·2016·Circulation

Abstract

Background—: We assessed the effect of automated treatment adherence support delivered via mobile phone short message system (SMS) text messages on blood pressure. Methods and Results—: In this pragmatic, single-blind, 3-arm, randomized trial (SMS-Text Adherence Support [StAR]) undertaken in South Africa, patients treated for high blood pressure were randomly allocated in a 1:1:1 ratio to information only, interactive SMS text messaging, or usual care. The primary outcome was change in systolic blood pressure at 12 months from baseline measured with a validated oscillometric device. All trial staff were masked to treatment allocation. Analyses were intention to treat. Between June 26, 2012, and November 23, 2012, 1372 participants were randomized to receive information-only SMS text messages (n=457), interactive SMS text messages (n=458), or usual care (n=457). Primary outcome data were available for 1256 participants (92%). At 12 months, the mean adjusted change in systolic blood pressure compared with usual care was −2.2 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, −4.4 to −0.04) with information-only SMS and −1.6 mm Hg (95% confidence interval, −3.7 to 0.6) with interactive SMS. Odds ratios for the proportion of participants with a blood pressure <140/90 mm Hg were 1.42 (95% confidence interval, 1.03–1.95) for information-only messaging and 1.41 (95% confidence interval, 1.02–1.95) for interactive messaging compared with usual care. Conclusions—: In this randomized trial of an automated adherence support program delivered by SMS text message in a general outpatient population of adults with high blood pressure, we found a small reduction in systolic blood pressure control compared with usual care at 12 months. There was no evidence that an interactive intervention increased this effect. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02019823. South African National Clinical Trials Register, number SANCTR DOH-27-1212-386; Pan Africa Trial Register, number PACTR201411000724141.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1161/circulationaha.115.017530

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [29]Contreras EEM la Figuera von Wichmann de MM Guillén VVG Ylla-Catalá AA Figueras MM Balaña MM Naval JJ Effectiveness of an intervention to provide information to patients with hypertension as short text messages and reminders sent to their mobile phone (HTA-Alert) Aten Primaria 2004 34 399 405 15546536 PMC7668816

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobrow, K., Farmer, A. J., Springer, D., Shanyinde, M., Yu, L.-M., Brennan, T., Rayner, B., Namane, M., Steyn, K., Tarassenko, L., & Levitt, N.
Affiliations
  • Western Cape Department of Health (ZA)
  • From Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Department of Engineering Science (K.B., D.S., T.B., L.T.) and Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences (K.B., A.J.F., M.S., L.-M.Y.), University of Oxford, UK; Chronic Disease Initiative for Africa, Cape Town, South Africa (K.B., K.S., N.L.); Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa (B.R.); University of Cape Town, South Africa (B.R.); Western Cape Province Department of Health, Cape Town, South...
Corresponding author
Bobrow, Kirsten
Venue
Circulation
Published
2016-02-09
Volume
133
Issue
6
Pages
592-600
ISSN
  • 0009-7322 (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4539
OpenAlex
W2262346340
Cited by
295
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 11
FWCI
62.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Circulation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (088877)
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0512-10077)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Keywords
hypertension, antihypertensive treatment adherence, safety management systems, mobile health, systolic blood pressure control, antihypertensive therapy, South Africa
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, South Africa, Single-Blind Method, Telemedicine, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review