Cited by 46Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsMedication Adherence and ComplianceHealth Policy Implementation Science

Using the Medical Research Council framework for development and evaluation of complex interventions in a low resource setting to develop a theory-based treatment support intervention delivered via SMS text message to improve blood pressure control

Open access
Bobrow, Kirsten, Farmer, Andrew, Cishe, Nomazizi, Nwagi, Ntobeko, Namane, Mosedi, Brennan, Thomas P., Springer, David, Tarassenko, Lionel +1 more·2018·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several frameworks now exist to guide intervention development but there remains only limited evidence of their application to health interventions based around use of mobile phones or devices, particularly in a low-resource setting. We aimed to describe our experience of using the Medical Research Council (MRC) Framework on complex interventions to develop and evaluate an adherence support intervention for high blood pressure delivered by SMS text message. We further aimed to describe the developed intervention in line with reporting guidelines for a structured and systematic description. METHODS: We used a non-sequential and flexible approach guided by the 2008 MRC Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions. RESULTS: We reviewed published literature and established a multi-disciplinary expert group to guide the development process. We selected health psychology theory and behaviour change techniques that have been shown to be important in adherence and persistence with chronic medications. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with various stakeholders identified ways in which treatment adherence could be supported and also identified key features of well-regarded messages: polite tone, credible information, contextualised, and endorsed by identifiable member of primary care facility staff. Direct and indirect user testing enabled us to refine the intervention including refining use of language and testing of interactive components. CONCLUSIONS: Our experience shows that using a formal intervention development process is feasible in a low-resource multi-lingual setting. The process enabled us to pre-test assumptions about the intervention and the evaluation process, allowing the improvement of both. Describing how a multi-component intervention was developed including standardised descriptions of content aimed to support behaviour change will enable comparison with other similar interventions and support development of new interventions. Even in low-resource settings, funders and policy-makers should provide researchers with time and resources for intervention development work and encourage evaluation of the entire design and testing process. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial of the intervention is registered with South African National Clinical Trials Register number (SANCTR DOH-27-1212-386; 28/12/2012); Pan Africa Trial Register (PACTR201411000724141; 14/12/2013); ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT02019823 ; 24/12/2013).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-017-2808-9

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bobrow, K., Farmer, A., Cishe, N., Nwagi, N., Namane, M., Brennan, T. P., Springer, D., Tarassenko, L., & Levitt, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • Western Cape Department of Health (ZA)
Corresponding author
Bobrow, Kirsten
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2018-01-23
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
33-33
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2787373480
Cited by
46
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3
FWCI
7.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (GB) and Wellcome Trust (DFR RDV0)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
Keywords
MRC framework for complex interventions, intervention development, safety management systems, mobile health, hypertension, blood pressure control, medication adherence, behaviour change techniques, health psychology theory, resource-limited settings, user testing, stakeholder engagement, primary care
MeSH terms
Adult, Africa, Aged, Behavior Therapy, Female, Health Resources, Humans, Hypertension, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Theoretical, Self Care, Program Evaluation, Program Development, Focus Groups, Advisory Committees, Biomedical Research, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review