Cited by 13Treatment of Major DepressionFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Feasibility of studying brain morphology in major depressive disorder with structural magnetic resonance imaging and clinical data from the electronic medical record: A pilot study

Open access
Hoogenboom, Wouter S., Perlis, Roy H., Smoller, Jordan W., Zeng-Treitler, Qing, Gainer, Vivian S., Murphy, Shawn N., Churchill, Susanne E., Kohane, Isaac S. +2 more·2013·Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging

Abstract

For certain research questions related to long-term outcomes or to rare disorders, designing prospective studies is impractical or prohibitively expensive. Such studies could instead utilize clinical and magnetic resonance imaging data (MRI) collected as part of routine clinical care, stored in the electronic medical record (EMR). Using major depressive disorder (MDD) as a disease model, we examined the feasibility of studying brain morphology and associations with remission using clinical and MRI data exclusively drawn from the EMR. Advanced automated tools were used to select MDD patients and controls from the EMR who had brain MRI data, but no diagnosed brain pathology. MDD patients were further assessed for remission status by review of clinical charts. Twenty MDD patients (eight full-remitters, six partial-remitters, and six non-remitters), and 15 healthy control subjects met all study criteria for advanced morphometric analyses. Compared to controls, MDD patients had significantly smaller right rostral-anterior cingulate volume, and level of non-remission was associated with smaller left hippocampus and left rostral-middle frontal gyrus volume. The use of EMR data for psychiatric research may provide a timely and cost-effective approach with the potential to generate large study samples reflective of the real population with the illness studied.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pscychresns.2012.07.007

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Iosifescu DV Hoogenboom WS Perlis RH Smoller JW Zeng-Treitler Q Gainer VS Murphy SN Churchill SE Kohane I Shenton ME 2010 Limbic system white matter microstructure and treatment outcome in major depressive disorder: A large scale DTI study using legacy data Neuropsychopharmacology 35 S78 187 A131 PMC6450652 22540406

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoogenboom, W. S., Perlis, R. H., Smoller, J. W., Zeng-Treitler, Q., Gainer, V. S., Murphy, S. N., Churchill, S. E., Kohane, I. S., Shenton, M. E., & Iosifescu, D. V.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Venue
Psychiatry Research: Neuroimaging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-03
Volume
211
Issue
3
Pages
202-213
ISSN
0925-4927 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2020746764
Cited by
13
References
49
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
1.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Research Neuroimaging (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health (R01 MH 50740, LM008748)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH50740, R01MH050740, MH-086026, K24MH094614, R01MH086026, K23MH067111)
  • U.S. National Library of Medicine (U54LM008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
major depressive disorder, brain structure, structural MRI, electronic health records, feasibility, remission, rostral anterior cingulate cortex, hippocampus, rostral middle frontal gyrus
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Brain, Major Depressive Disorder, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Young Adult, Electronic Health Records

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review