CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 111Probiotics and Fermented FoodsListeria monocytogenes in Food SafetyEssential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inhibitory activity of Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 against Listeria innocua when used as an adjunct starter in the manufacture of cheese

Open access
Mills, Susan, Serrano, LMariela, Griffin, Carmel, O'Connor, Paula M, Schaad, Gwenda, Bruining, Chris, Hill, Colin, Ross, RPaul, Meijer, Wilco C·2011·Microbial Cell Factories
DOI 10.1186/1475-2859-10-s1-s7PMC PMC3231933
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 isolated from a soft French artisanal cheese produces a potent class IIa bacteriocin with 100% homology to plantaricin 423 and bacteriocidal activity against Listeria innocua and Listeria monocytogenes. The bacteriocin was found to be highly stable at temperatures as high as 100°C and pH ranges from 1-10. While this relatively narrow spectrum bacteriocin also exhibited antimicrobial activity against species of enterococci, it did not inhibit dairy starters including lactococci and lactobacilli when tested by well diffusion assay (WDA). In order to test the suitability of Lb. plantarum LMG P-26358 as an anti-listerial adjunct with nisin-producing lactococci, laboratory-scale cheeses were manufactured. Results indicated that combining Lb. plantarum LMG P-26358 (at 108 colony forming units (cfu)/ml) with a nisin producer is an effective strategy to eliminate the biological indicator strain, L. innocua. Moreover, industrial-scale cheeses also demonstrated that Lb. plantarum LMG P-26358 was much more effective than the nisin producer alone for protection against the indicator. MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry confirmed the presence of plantaricin 423 and nisin in the appropriate cheeses over an 18 week ripening period. A spray-dried fermentate of Lb. plantarum LMG P-26358 also demonstrated potent anti-listerial activity in vitro using L. innocua. Overall, the results suggest that Lb. plantarum LMG P-26358 is a suitable adjunct for use with nisin-producing cultures to improve the safety and quality of dairy products.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1475-2859-10-s1-s7

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Mode of action of plantaricin 423 on Listeria innocua. Parameters tested were optical density (OD 600 nm) (a) and cell viability (cfu/ml) (b).
Figure 1 Mode of action of plantaricin 423 on Listeria innocua. Parameters tested were optical density (OD 600 nm) (a) and cell viability (cfu/ml) (b).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Minimum inhibitory concentration of plantaricin 423 against Listeria innocua defined as the minimal concentration showing a visible zone of inhibition.
Figure 2 Minimum inhibitory concentration of plantaricin 423 against Listeria innocua defined as the minimal concentration showing a visible zone of inhibition.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Counts of viable Listeria innocua cells in cheeses manufactured with the starter Lactococcus lactis DPC4268 (Vat 1) and accompanied with either Lactococcus lactis CSK 65 (Vat 2); Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 (Vat 3); Lactococcus lactis CSK 65 and Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 (Vat 4). Insert shows cheeses (day 28) from vats 3 and 4 overlaid with Listeria innocua.
Figure 3 Counts of viable Listeria innocua cells in cheeses manufactured with the starter Lactococcus lactis DPC4268 (Vat 1) and accompanied with either Lactococcus lactis CSK 65 (Vat 2); Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 (Vat 3); Lactococcus lactis CSK 65 and Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 (Vat 4). Insert shows cheeses (day 28) from vats 3 and 4 overlaid with Listeria innocua.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Listeria innocua counts following 5 or 24 hours of exposure to ~1g of industrial cheeses.
Figure 4 Listeria innocua counts following 5 or 24 hours of exposure to ~1g of industrial cheeses.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 spray-dried powder (1, 5, 10 and 15%) on the viability of Listeria innocua.
Figure 5 The effect of Lactobacillus plantarum LMG P-26358 spray-dried powder (1, 5, 10 and 15%) on the viability of Listeria innocua.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mills, S., Serrano, L., Griffin, C., O'Connor, P. M., Schaad, G., Bruining, C., Hill, C., Ross, R., & Meijer, W. C.
Affiliations
  • Teagasc - The Irish Agriculture and Food Development Authority (IE)
  • CSK Food Enrichment (Netherlands) (NL)
  • University College Cork (IE)
Corresponding author
Ross, RPaul
ORCID
Venue
Microbial Cell Factories
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2011-08-30
Volume
10
Issue
S1
Pages
S7-S7
ISSN
1475-2859 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1186/1475-2859-10-s1-s7
PMC
PMC3231933
OpenAlex
W2171666000
Cited by
111
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
7.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Microbial Cell Factories (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (acceptedVersion)
  • Cork Open Research Archive (University College Cork, Ireland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • T-Stór (Teagasc) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Lenus, The Irish Health Repository (Dr Steevens Hospital Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Listeria monocytogenes in Food Safety
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Keywords
Lactobacillus plantarum, Listeria innocua, Listeria monocytogenes, bacteriocins, class IIa bacteriocins, nisin, adjunct starter cultures, cheese safety, antilisterial activity, Enterococcus, dairy starter cultures, cheese ripening
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cheese, Food Microbiology, Hydrogen-Ion Concentration, Listeria, Nisin, Time Factors, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization, Lactic Acid, Lactobacillus plantarum, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review