Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 398

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive value of progression-related gene classifier in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer

Open access
Kim, Wun-Jae, Kim, Eun-Jung, Kim, Seon-Kyu, Kim, Yong-June, Ha, Yun-Sok, Jeong, Pildu, Kim, Min-Ju, Yun, Seok-Joong, Lee, Keon, Moon, Sung-Kwon, Lee, Sang-Cheol, Cha, Eun-Jong, Bae, Suk-Chul·2010·Molecular Cancer

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While several molecular markers of bladder cancer prognosis have been identified, the limited value of current prognostic markers has created the need for new molecular indicators of bladder cancer outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify genetic signatures associated with disease prognosis in bladder cancer. RESULTS: We used 272 primary bladder cancer specimens for microarray analysis and real-time reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis. Microarray gene expression analysis of randomly selected 165 primary bladder cancer specimens as an original cohort was carried out. Risk scores were applied to stratify prognosis-related gene classifiers. Prognosis-related gene classifiers were individually analyzed with tumor invasiveness (non-muscle invasive bladder cancer [NMIBC] and muscle invasive bladder cancer [MIBC]) and prognosis. We validated selected gene classifiers using RT-PCR in the original (165) and independent (107) cohorts. Ninety-seven genes related to disease progression among NMIBC patients were identified by microarray data analysis. Eight genes, a progression-related gene classifier in NMIBC, were selected for RT-PCR. The progression-related gene classifier in patients with NMIBC was closely correlated with progression in both original and independent cohorts. Furthermore, no patient with NMIBC in the good-prognosis signature group experienced cancer progression. CONCLUSIONS: We identified progression-related gene classifier that has strong predictive value for determining disease outcome in NMIBC. This gene classifier could assist in selecting NMIBC patients who might benefit from more aggressive therapeutic intervention or surveillance.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1476-4598-9-3

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 35 references

Cited by

See all 398

Metadata

Authors
Kim, W.-J., Kim, E.-J., Kim, S.-K., Kim, Y.-J., Ha, Y.-S., Jeong, P., Kim, M.-J., Yun, S.-J., Lee, K., Moon, S.-K., Lee, S.-C., Cha, E.-J., & Bae, S.-C.
Venue
Molecular Cancer
Published
2010
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
3
ISSN
1476-4598 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2099951161
Cited by
398
References
35
FWCI
17.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive value of progression-related gene classifier in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1476-4598-9-3
The paper
Kim, W.-J., Kim, E.-J., Kim, S.-K., Kim, Y.-J., Ha, Y.-S., Jeong, P., Kim, M.-J., Yun, S.-J., Lee, K., Moon, S.-K., Lee, S.-C., Cha, E.-J., & Bae, S.-C. (2010). Predictive value of progression-related gene classifier in primary non-muscle invasive bladder cancer. Molecular Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-9-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.