The DOI matches its Crossref record; 35 of the 35 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Visualising associations between paired ‘omics’ data sets
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Each omics platform is now able to generate a large amount of data. Genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, interactomics are compiled at an ever increasing pace and now form a core part of the fundamental systems biology framework. Recently, several integrative approaches have been proposed to extract meaningful information. However, these approaches lack of visualisation outputs to fully unravel the complex associations between different biological entities. RESULTS: The multivariate statistical approaches 'regularized Canonical Correlation Analysis' and 'sparse Partial Least Squares regression' were recently developed to integrate two types of highly dimensional 'omics' data and to select relevant information. Using the results of these methods, we propose to revisit few graphical outputs to better understand the relationships between two 'omics' data and to better visualise the correlation structure between the different biological entities. These graphical outputs include Correlation Circle plots, Relevance Networks and Clustered Image Maps. We demonstrate the usefulness of such graphical outputs on several biological data sets and further assess their biological relevance using gene ontology analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Such graphical outputs are undoubtedly useful to aid the interpretation of these promising integrative analysis tools and will certainly help in addressing fundamental biological questions and understanding systems as a whole. AVAILABILITY: The graphical tools described in this paper are implemented in the freely available R package mixOmics and in its associated web application.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Cytoscape: A software Environment for integrated models of biomolecular interaction networks
Shannon, P., Markiel, A., Ozier, O., Baliga, N. S., Wang, J. T., Ramage, D., Amin, N., Schwikowski, B., & Ideker, T. (2003) · Genome Research · doi:10.1101/gr.1239303 · Cited by 51,888
Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology
Ashburner, M., Ball, C. A., Blake, J. A., Botstein, D., Butler, H., Cherry, J. M., Davis, A. P., Dolinski, K., Dwight, S. S., Eppig, J. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/75556 · Cited by 43,206
Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns
Eisen, M. B., Spellman, P. T., Brown, P. O., & Botstein, D. (1998) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.95.25.14863 · Cited by 16,184
RELATIONS BETWEEN TWO SETS OF VARIATES
HOTELLING, H. (1936) · Biometrika · doi:10.1093/biomet/28.3-4.321 · Cited by 5,263
Succession of microbial consortia in the developing infant gut microbiome
Koenig, J. E., Spor, A., Scalfone, N., Fricker, A. D., Stombaugh, J., Knight, R., Angenent, L. T., & Ley, R. E. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1000081107 · Cited by 2,540
Improved scoring of functional groups from gene expression data by decorrelating GO graph structure
Alexa, A., Rahnenführer, J., & Lengauer, T. (2006) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl140 · Cited by 2,188
SIMPLS: An alternative approach to partial least squares regression
de Jong, S. (1993) · Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems · doi:10.1016/0169-7439(93)85002-x · Cited by 1,905 · cited 1×
“Several PLS algorithms have been proposed in the literature, for different shapes of data (SIMPLS [48], PLS1 and PLS2 [47], PLS-SVD [49]), as well as for different modelling aims (predictive like PLS2, or modelling like PLS-mode A, see [2,23,50]).”
MethodThe pls Package: Principal Component and Partial Least Squares Regression in R
Mevik, B.-H., & Wehrens, R. (2007) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v018.i02 · Cited by 1,782
Witten, D. M., Tibshirani, R., & Hastie, T. (2009) · Biostatistics · doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxp008 · Cited by 1,535
A gene expression database for the molecular pharmacology of cancer
Scherf, U., Ross, D. T., Waltham, M., Smith, L. H., Lee, J. K., Tanabe, L., Kohn, K. W., Reinhold, W. C., Myers, T. G., Andrews, D. T., et al. (2000) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/73439 · Cited by 1,450
Cited by
mixOmics: An R package for ‘omics feature selection and multiple data integration
Rohart, F., Gautier, B., Singh, A., & Lê Cao, K.-A. (2017) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005752 · Cited by 4,056
Henderson, G., Cox, F., Ganesh, S., Jonker, A., Young, W., Collaborators, G. R. C., Abecia, L., Angarita, E., Aravena, P., Nora Arenas, G., et al. (2015) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep14567 · Cited by 1,682
The vaginal microbiome and preterm birth
Fettweis, J. M., Serrano, M. G., Brooks, J. P., Edwards, D. J., Girerd, P. H., Parikh, H. I., Huang, B., Arodz, T. J., Edupuganti, L., Glascock, A. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0450-2 · Cited by 983
Tavella, T., Rampelli, S., Guidarelli, G., Bazzocchi, A., Gasperini, C., Pujos-Guillot, E., Comte, B., Barone, M., Biagi, E., Candela, M., et al. (2021) · Gut Microbes · doi:10.1080/19490976.2021.1880221 · Cited by 298
Duran-Pinedo, A. E., & Frias-Lopez, J. (2015) · Microbes and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.micinf.2015.03.014 · Cited by 187
Metadata
- Authors
- González, I., Cao, K.-A. L., Davis, M. J., & Déjean, S.
- Venue
- BioData Mining
- Published
- 2012-11-13
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-19
- ISSN
- 1756-0381 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2096315641
- Cited by
- 313
- References
- 35
- FWCI
- 4.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Visualising associations between paired ‘omics’ data sets. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1186/1756-0381-5-19
- The paper
- González, I., Cao, K.-A. L., Davis, M. J., & Déjean, S. (2012). Visualising associations between paired ‘omics’ data sets. BioData Mining. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-0381-5-19
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
