Cited by 58Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlMindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPhysical Activity and Health

Increased heart rate variability but no effect on blood pressure from 8 weeks of hatha yoga - a pilot study

Open access
Papp, Marian E, Lindfors, Petra, Storck, Niklas, Wändell, Per E·2013·BMC Research Notes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Yoga exercises are known to decrease stress and restore autonomic balance. Yet knowledge about the physiological effects of inversion postures is limited. This study aimed to investigate the effects of inversion postures (head below the heart) on blood pressure (BP) and heart rate variability (HRV). METHODS: Twelve healthy women and men took part in an 8-week yoga program (60 min once a week). BP was measured with an automatic Omron mx3 oscillometric monitoring device and HRV with a Holter 24-hour ECG at baseline and 8 weeks after the intervention. RESULTS: There was no significant effect of inversion postures on BP. Nine out of 12 participants showed a significant increase in HRV (p < 0.05) at night (2 hours) on pNN50% (12.7 ± 12.5 to 18.2 ± 13.3). There were no significant changes in other HRV measures such as NN50, LF, HF, LF/HF ratio, LF normalized units (n.u.), HF n.u. and RMSSD. CONCLUSION: Eight weeks of hatha yoga improved HRV significantly which suggests an increased vagal tone and reduced sympathetic activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/1756-0500-6-59

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Papp, M. E., Lindfors, P., Storck, N., & Wändell, P. E.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
  • Saint Göran Hospital (SE)
Corresponding author
Wändell, Per E
Venue
BMC Research Notes
Published
2013-02-11
Volume
6
Issue
1
Pages
59-59
ISSN
1756-0500 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2046271802
Cited by
58
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Research Notes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
hatha yoga, heart rate variability, blood pressure, autonomic nervous system, vagal tone, sympathetic activity, 24-hour ECG
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Pressure, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review