Cited by 52Gambling Behavior and TreatmentsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesDigital Mental Health Interventions

Reasons for using web-based counselling among family and friends impacted by problem gambling

Open access
Rodda, Simone N, Lubman, Dan I, Dowling, Nicki A, McCann, Terence V·2013·Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health

Abstract

Despite the range of free services available in Australia, few family and friends of people with problem gambling access them. Over recent years, the Australian gambling help service system has expanded to include web-based counselling. Family and friends make up approximately 15% of people accessing this new modality, however little is known of the reasons for choosing this form of assistance over other interventions. This research aimed to understand the reasons family and friends choose to use single-session web-based counselling over other modes (i.e., face-to-face and telephone), as well as why they would recommend it to other affected people. The study involved 63 participants (70% intimate partners, 13% children, 6% friends, 5% parents, 6% other family members) who completed open-ended questions on reasons for using and recommending web-based counselling, with over three-quarters of the sample seeking help for the first time. A descriptive content analysis revealed multiple overlapping themes, including ease of access (41.3% of reasons for choosing), privacy and anonymity (17.5%), and a preference for the characteristics inherent in the therapeutic medium (23.8%). We also found web-based counselling provided a pathway into services (11.1%) and that the intervention provided was viewed as helpful and a reason for recommendation (34.9% of reasons for recommending). This research provides important new information on the help-seeking preferences of family and friends. Future research is required to understand the relationship between reasons for use, help-seeking preferences and the effectiveness of single-session web-based counselling for people affected by problem gambling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/2195-3007-3-12

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rodda, S. N., Lubman, D. I., Dowling, N. A., & McCann, T. V.
Affiliations
  • Eastern Health (AU)
  • Deakin University (AU)
  • Victoria University (AU)
Corresponding author
Rodda, Simone N
Venue
Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health
Published
2013-07-29
Volume
3
Issue
1
ISSN
2195-3007 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124401114
Cited by
52
References
43
Citations by year
2025: 7 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
3.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Asian Journal of Gambling Issues and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Victoria University Research Repository (Victoria University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Gambling Behavior and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
problem gambling, help-seeking preferences, access to help, privacy and anonymity, intimate partners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review