Cited by 503Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsTelemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Working Alliance in Online Therapy as Compared to Face-to-Face Therapy: Preliminary Results

Cook, Jonathan E., Doyle, Carol·2002·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

Online therapy, defined as the provision of mental health services through the Internet, is a growing field that has sparked an abundance of interest and controversy. A primary concern in the practice of online therapy is whether a working alliance, considered a central component of successful therapy, can develop when participants are geographically separated. Working alliance scores were compared between a small, primarily female sample of online therapy consumers and a representative sample of traditional face-to-face therapy clients. Results revealed significantly higher means on the goal subscale and composite score of the Working Alliance Inventory in the online sample, suggesting that a working alliance can be adequately established in therapy delivered online. No significant differences in the level of working alliance were found within the online therapy sample with respect to modality of communication, client presenting problem, or therapist. Themes from comments suggest the importance for participants of the disinhibiting effects of the medium.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109493102753770480

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Previous studies have provided evidence that a therapeutic alliance may be established successfully in fully internet-delivered therapy, even to degrees comparable to or higher than in traditional face-to-face treatment.

    “Previous studies have provided evidence that a therapeutic alliance may be established successfully in fully internet-delivered therapy, even to degrees comparable to or even higher than in traditional face-to-face treatment (Pihlaja et al., 2018; Hadjistavropoulos et al., 2017; Cook and Doyle, 2002; Sucala et al., 2012; Andersson et al., 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cook, J. E., & Doyle, C.
Affiliations
  • Portland State University (US)
  • Lewis & Clark College (US)
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2002-04
Volume
5
Issue
2
Pages
95-105
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W2102823714
Cited by
503
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 53 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 28
FWCI
7.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • CyberPsychology & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
Keywords
therapeutic relationship, online therapy, face-to-face therapy, Working Alliance Inventory, goal setting, therapist characteristics
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Work, Internet

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review