Cited by 335Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenome Rearrangement AlgorithmsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Towards a comprehensive structural variation map of an individual human genome

Open access
Pang, Andy W, MacDonald, Jeffrey R, Pinto, Dalila, Wei, John, Rafiq, Muhammad A, Conrad, Donald F, Park, Hansoo, Hurles, Matthew E +6 more·2010·Genome Biology

Abstract

Background: Several genomes have now been sequenced, with millions of genetic variants annotated. While significant progress has been made in mapping single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and small (<10 bp) insertion/deletions (indels), the annotation of larger structural variants has been less comprehensive. It is still unclear to what extent a typical genome differs from the reference assembly, and the analysis of the genomes sequenced to date have shown varying results for copy number variation (CNV) and inversions. Results: We have combined computational re-analysis of existing whole genome sequence data with novel microarray-based analysis, and detect 12,178 structural variants covering 40.6 Mb that were not reported in the initial sequencing of the first published personal genome. We estimate a total non-SNP variation content of 48.8 Mb in a single genome. Our results indicate that this genome differs from the consensus reference sequence by approximately 1.2% when considering indels/CNVs, 0.1% by SNPs and approximately 0.3% by inversions. The structural variants impact 4,867 genes, and >24% of structural variants would not be imputed by SNP-association. Conclusions: Our results indicate that a large number of structural variants have been unreported in the individual genomes published to date. This significant extent and complexity of structural variants, as well as the growing recognition of their medical relevance, necessitate they be actively studied in health-related analyses of personal genomes. The new catalogue of structural variants generated for this genome provides a crucial resource for future comparison studies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/gb-2010-11-5-r52

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Compared with a recent individual-genome survey, the set had a similar deletion size distribution but different size distributions for other structural-variant classes, reflecting ascertainment differences.

    “we also compared our set to a recent survey of SVs in an individual genome37 based on capillary sequencing and array-based analyses24, and observed a similar size distribution for deletions, but differences in the size distributions of other SV classes, reflecting underlying differences in SV ascertainment”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pang, A. W., MacDonald, J. R., Pinto, D., Wei, J., Rafiq, M. A., Conrad, D. F., Park, H., Hurles, M. E., Lee, C., Venter, J. C., Kirkness, E. F., Levy, S., Feuk, L., & Scherer, S. W.
Affiliations
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • J. Craig Venter Institute (US)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
  • Feuk, Lars
  • Scherer, Stephen W
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2010-05-19
Volume
11
Issue
5
Pages
R52-R52
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W2153994884
Cited by
335
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 21 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
FWCI
19.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • TSpace (University of Toronto) (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Canadian Institute for Advanced Research
  • Genome Canada
  • Ontario Genomics
  • Göran Gustafssons Stiftelser
  • Ontario Genomics Institute
  • Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen
  • Stiftelsen för Strategisk Forskning
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (825.06.031)
  • University of Toronto
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • Sickkids Research Institute
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genome Rearrangement Algorithms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
structural variants, copy number variation, chromosomal inversions, insertion-deletion variants, personal genome, variant imputation
MeSH terms
Chromosome Mapping, Gene Frequency, Humans, Mutation, Reproducibility of Results, Gene Library, Genome, Human, Polymerase Chain Reaction, In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Base Pairing, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Databases, Genetic, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, DNA Copy Number Variations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review