Cited by 27Health disparities and outcomesCardiac Health and Mental HealthAging, Health, and Disability

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Cardiovascular and all-cause mortality attributable to loneliness in older Swedish men and women

Open access
Novak, Masuma, Waern, Margda, Johansson, Lena, Zettergren, Anna, Ryden, Lina, Wetterberg, Hanna, Gudmundsson, Pia, Skoog, Ingmar·2020·BMC Geriatrics

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: This study examined whether loneliness predicts cardiovascular- and all-cause mortality in older men and women. Methods: Baseline data from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort Studies, collected during 2000 on 70-year-olds born 1930 and living in Gothenburg were used for analysis ( n = 524). Mortality data were analyzed until 2012 through Swedish national registers. Results: Perceived loneliness was reported by 17.1% of the men and 30.9% of the women in a face-to-face interview with mental health professional. A total of 142 participants died during the 12-year follow-up period, with 5334 person-years at risk, corresponding to 26.6 deaths/1000 person-years. Cardiovascular disease accounted for 59.2% of all deaths. The cumulative rates/1000 person-years for cardiovascular mortality were 20.8 (men) and 11.5 (women), and for all-cause mortality 33.8 (men) and 20.5 (women), respectively. In Cox regression models, no significant increased risk of mortality was seen for men with loneliness compared to men without loneliness (cardiovascular mortality HR 1.52, 95% CI 0.78–2.96; all-cause HR 1.32, 95% CI 0.77–2.28). Increased risk of cardiovascular mortality was observed in women with loneliness compared to those without (HR 2.25 95% CI 1.14–4.45), and the risk remained significant in a multivariable-adjusted model (HR 2.42 95% CI 1.04–5.65). Conclusions: Loneliness was shown to be an independent predictor of cardiovascular mortality in women. We found no evidence to indicate that loneliness was associated with an increased risk of either cardiovascular- or all-cause mortality in men.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12877-020-01603-x

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social isolation is more common among people with lower levels of education and those who are unemployed.

    “possibly because SI is more common among people with lower levels of education and those who are unemployed 17 .”

    From A systematic review and meta-analysis of 90 cohort studies of social isolation, loneliness and mortality (2023) · cites this paper as [17]

    The Results section (‘Loneliness and background characteristics’; page unavailable) reports that loneliness was more common among participants with poor economic status, but it does not report an association with lower education or unemployment. The Methods section (‘Assessment of loneliness’; page unavailable) measures self-reported loneliness rather than social isolation. Searches for education, employment, and social isolation found no passage establishing the claimed associations. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Peplau LA, Perman D. Loneliness: a sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy. In: Peplau LA, Perman D, editors. Perspective on loneliness. New York: Wiley; 1982. p. 1–8.
  2. Ong AD, Uchino BN, Wethington E. Loneliness and health in older adults: a mini-review and synthesis. Gerontology. 2016;62(4):443–9. https://doi.org/10.1159/000441651 PubMed PMID: 26539997; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6162046. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Luo Y, Waite LJ. Loneliness and mortality among older adults in China. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2014;69:633–45. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Maturin TT, Nadine ST, Ralitsa S, Céline M, Mélanie C, Hélène A, et al. Feelings of loneliness and living alone as predictors of mortality in the elderly: the PAQUID study. Psychosom Med. 2016;78:904–9. · DOI
  5. Perissinotto CM, Stojacic CI, Covinsky KE. Loneliness in older persons: a predictor of functional decline and death. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1078–84. · DOI · Paper page
  6. Shiovitz-Ezra S, Ayalon L. Situational versus chronic loneliness as risk factors for all-cause mortality. Int Psychogeriatr. 2010;22(3):455–62. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Berg S. Psychological functioning in 70- and 75-year-old people. A study in an industrialized city. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1980;288:1–47.
  8. Eriksson BG, Mellstrom D, Svanborg A. Medical-social intervention in a 70-year-old Swedish population. A general presentation of methodological experience. Compr Gerontol C. 1987;1:49–56.
  9. Rinder L, Roupe S, Steen B, Svanborg A. Seventy-year-old people in Gothenburg. A population study in an industrialized Swedish city. Acta Med Scand. 1975;198:397–407. · DOI
  10. Rydberg ST, Ahlner F, Blennow K, Dahlin-Ivanoff S, Falk H, Havstam JL, et al. The Gothenburg H70 Birth cohort study 2014–16: design, methods and study population. Eur J Epidemiol. 2019;34(2):191–209. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10654-018-0459-8 PubMed PMID: 30421322; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC6373310. · DOI
  11. Steen B, Djurfeldt H. The gerontological and geriatric population studies in Gothenburg, Sweden. Z Gerontol. 1993;26:163–9.
  12. Bergh I, Steen G, Waern M, Johansson B, Oden A, Sjostrom B, et al. Pain and its relation to cognitive function and depressive symptoms: a Swedish population study of 70-year-old men and women. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2003;26:903–12. · DOI
  13. Wethington E, Eccleston C, Gay G, Gooberman-Hill R, Schofield P, Bacon E, et al. Establishing a research agenda on mobile health technologies and later-life pain using an evidence-based consensus workshop approach. 2018. · DOI
  14. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington: American Psychiatric Association; 2013. · DOI · Paper page
  15. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-IV TR. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association; 2000.
  16. Skoog I, Nilsson L, Landahl S, Steen B. Mental disorders and the use of psychotropic drugs in an 85-year-old urban population. Int Psychogeriatr. 1993;5:33–48. · DOI
  17. van’t Hof MA, Burema J. Assessment of bias in the SENECA study. Eur J Clin Nutr. 1996;50(Suppl 2):4–8.
  18. Borys S, Perlman D. Gender differences in loneliness. Personal Soc Psychol Bull. 1985;11:63–75. · DOI
  19. Rico-Uribe LA, Caballero FF, Martin-Maria N, Cabello M, Ayuso-Mateos JL, Miret M. Association of loneliness with all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2018;13(1):e0190033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190033 PubMed PMID: 29300743; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5754055. · DOI
  20. Thurston RC, Kubzansky LD. Women, loneliness, and incident coronary heart disease. Psychosom Med. 2009;71(8):836–42. https://doi.org/10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181b40efc PubMed PMID: 19661189; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2851545. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Novak, M., Waern, M., Johansson, L., Zettergren, A., Ryden, L., Wetterberg, H., Gudmundsson, P., & Skoog, I.
Affiliations
University of Gothenburg (SE)
Corresponding author
Novak, Masuma
Venue
BMC Geriatrics
Published
2020-06-09
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
201-201
ISSN
1471-2318 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3033761545
Cited by
27
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Geriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • the Swedish Research Council (11267, 825-2007-7462, 2012-5041, 2013-8717, 2015-02830, 2016-01590)
  • Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare (2001-2835, 2004-0145, 2006-0596, 2008-1111, 2010-0870, 2013-1202, 2016-07097, AGECAP 2013-2300, 2013-2496, 2013-0475)
  • ALF-agreement (ALF 716681, ALF715841)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
loneliness, cardiovascular mortality, all-cause mortality, older adults, sex differences, social isolation, mortality risk
MeSH terms
Aged, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Mortality, Risk Factors, Sweden, Cohort Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review