Cited by 691Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityAging, Elder Care, and Social Issues

Correlates and predictors of loneliness in older-adults: a review of quantitative results informed by qualitative insights

Open access
Cohen-Mansfield, Jiska, Hazan, Haim, Lerman, Yaffa, Shalom, Vera·2016·International Psychogeriatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older persons are particularly vulnerable to loneliness because of common age-related changes and losses. This paper reviews predictors of loneliness in the older population as described in the current literature and a small qualitative study. METHODS: Peer-reviewed journal articles were identified from psycINFO, MEDLINE, and Google Scholar from 2000-2012. Overall, 38 articles were reviewed. Two focus groups were conducted asking older participants about the causes of loneliness. RESULTS: Variables significantly associated with loneliness in older adults were: female gender, non-married status, older age, poor income, lower educational level, living alone, low quality of social relationships, poor self-reported health, and poor functional status. Psychological attributes associated with loneliness included poor mental health, low self-efficacy beliefs, negative life events, and cognitive deficits. These associations were mainly studied in cross-sectional studies. In the focus groups, participants mentioned environmental barriers, unsafe neighborhoods, migration patterns, inaccessible housing, and inadequate resources for socializing. Other issues raised in the focus groups were the relationship between loneliness and boredom and inactivity, the role of recent losses of family and friends, as well as mental health issues, such as shame and fear. CONCLUSIONS: Future quantitative studies are needed to examine the impact of physical and social environments on loneliness in this population. It is important to better map the multiple factors and ways by which they impact loneliness to develop better solutions for public policy, city, and environmental planning, and individually based interventions. This effort should be viewed as a public health priority.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1017/s1041610215001532

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cohen-Mansfield, J., Hazan, H., Lerman, Y., & Shalom, V.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center (IL)
  • National Insurance Institute of Israel (IL)
Venue
International Psychogeriatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-04
Volume
28
Issue
4
Pages
557-576
ISSN
1041-6102 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2264218847
Cited by
691
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 87 · 2024: 95 · 2023: 104 · 2022: 113 · 2021: 107 · 2020: 62 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 17 · 2016: 3
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Psychogeriatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Aging, Elder Care, and Social Issues
Keywords
loneliness, older adults, predictors of loneliness, social isolation, living alone, interpersonal relationships, mental health, self-efficacy, cognitive impairment, life events, environmental barriers, housing, social environment, public health interventions
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Cross-Sectional Studies, Female, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Motor Activity, Quality of Life, Residence Characteristics, Sex Factors, Social Environment, Social Isolation, Socioeconomic Factors, Focus Groups, Marital Status, Qualitative Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review