Cited by 153Health disparities and outcomesAging, Health, and DisabilityHealth and Well-being Studies

Impact of loneliness and depression on mortality: Results from the longitudinal ageing study Amsterdam

Open access
Holwerda, Tjalling J., van Tilburg, Theo G., Deeg, Dorly J. H., Schutter, Natasja, Van, Rien, Dekker, Jack, Stek, Max L., Beekman, Aartjan T. F. +1 more·2016·British Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Loneliness is highly prevalent among older people, has serious health consequences and is an important predictor of mortality. Loneliness and depression may unfavourably interact with each other over time but data on this topic are scarce. AIMS: To determine whether loneliness is associated with excess mortality after 19 years of follow-up and whether the joint effect with depression confers further excess mortality. METHOD: Different aspects of loneliness were measured with the De Jong Gierveld scale and depression with the Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in a cohort of 2878 people aged 55-85 with 19 years of follow-up. Excess mortality hypotheses were tested with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard analyses controlling for potential confounders. RESULTS: At follow-up loneliness and depression were associated with excess mortality in older men and women in bivariate analysis but not in multivariate analysis. In multivariate analysis, severe depression was associated with excess mortality in men who were lonely but not in women. CONCLUSIONS: Loneliness and depression are important predictors of early death in older adults. Severe depression has a strong association with excess mortality in older men who were lonely, indicating a lethal combination in this group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1192/bjp.bp.115.168005

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In older ages, the presence of mild depressive symptoms is strongly associated with an increased risk of mortality, decline of overall health status and low quality of life.

    “In older ages, the presence of mild depressive symptoms are strongly associated with an increased risk of mortality, decline of overall health status and low quality of life (Cai et al., 2020;Holwerda et al., 2016;Sivertsen et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Holwerda TJ, Deeg DJ, Beekman AT, van Tilburg TG, Stek ML, Jonker C, Schoevers RA. Feelings of loneliness but not social isolation predict incident dementia in older persons. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2014; 85: 135-42.
  2. Beekman AT, Deeg DJ, Van Limbeek J, Braam AW, De Vries MZ, Van Tilburg W. Criterion validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D). Results from a community-based sample of older subjects in the Netherlands. Psychol Med 1997; 27: 231-5.
  3. McWhinnie JR. Disability assessment in population surveys: results of the OECD common development effort. Rev Epidemiol Sante ´Publique 1981; 29: 413-9.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holwerda, T. J., van Tilburg, T. G., Deeg, D. J. H., Schutter, N., Van, R., Dekker, J., Stek, M. L., Beekman, A. T. F., & Schoevers, R. A.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam Public Health (NL)
  • University of Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Holwerda, Tjalling J.
Venue
British Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2016-08
Volume
209
Issue
2
Pages
127-134
ISSN
  • 0007-1250 (ISSN-L)
  • 1472-1465
OpenAlex
W2341299966
Cited by
153
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 10
FWCI
15.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The British Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
loneliness, depression, mortality, older adults, excess mortality, sex differences, CES-D depression scale
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Depression, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Loneliness, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Netherlands

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review