Cited by 31Gut microbiota and healthMultiple Sclerosis Research StudiesAmyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Assessment of bidirectional relationships between 98 genera of the human gut microbiota and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a 2-sample Mendelian randomization study

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Growing evidence suggests a mutual interaction between gut microbiome alterations and ALS pathogenesis. However, previous studies were susceptible to potential confounding factors and reverse causation bias, likely leading to inconsistent and biased results. Objectives: To decipher the potentially mutual relationship between gut microbiota and ALS, we used a bidirectional two-sample MR approach to examine the associations between the gut microbiome and ALS. Results: Using the inverse variance-weighted method, OTU10032 unclassified Enterobacteriaceae species-level OTU and unclassified Acidaminococcaceae were associated with a higher risk of ALS (per relative abundance: OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07; P = 0.011 and OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.04; P = 0.009, respectively). Importantly, Gamma-Glu-Phe was showed potential deleterious effects on the risk of ALS (genetically predicted per a 1-standard deviation increase in the level of Gamma-Glu-Phe: OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.50–2.55; P = 0.012). Sensitivity analysis of the two candidate genera and metabolites using the MR-Egger and weighted-median methods produced similar estimates, and no horizontal pleiotropy or outliers were observed. Intriguingly, genetically predicted ALS was associated with an increase in the relative abundance of OTU4607_Sutterella (per 1-unit higher log odds: β, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.27–3.18; P = 0.020) and Lactobacillales_ORDER (per 1-unit higher log odds: β, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.09–0.94; P = 0.019). Conclusions: Our findings provide novel evidence supporting the bidirectional relationship between the gut microbiota and ALS. These results may contribute to designing microbiome- and microbiome-dependent metabolite interventions in future ALS clinical trials.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12883-021-02522-z

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • γ-glutamyl amino acids may be negatively associated with the risk of developing ALS, while γ-glutamyl phenylalanine is a specific risk factor for the disease.

    “Additionally, γ-glutamyl amino acids may be negatively associated with the risk of developing ALS, while γ-glutamyl phenylalanine is a specific risk factor for the disease.”
  • In a 2022 genome-wide association study of ALS analyzing data from 20,806 patients and 59,804 control individuals, Enterobacteriaceae and unclassified Acidaminococcaceae were found to be associated with a higher risk of ALS.

    “The association between gut flora and ALS was revealed in a 2022 genome-wide association study (GWAS) of ALS (82), which analyzed data from 20,806 patients and 59,804 control individuals. Enterobacteriaceae and unclassified Acidaminococcaceae were found to be associated with a higher risk of ALS.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 41 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Mazzini L, Mogna L, De Marchi F, Amoruso A, Pane M, Aloisio I, Cionci NB, Gaggìa F, Lucenti A, Bersano E, et al: Potential Role of Gut Microbiota in ALS Pathogenesis and Possible Novel Therapeutic Strategies. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2018;52 Suppl 1:S68-s70, Proceedings from the 9th Probiotics, Prebiotics and New Foods, Nutraceuticals and Botanicals for Nutrition & Human and Microbiota Health Meeting, held in Rome, Italy from September 10 to 12, 2017. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, L., Zhuang, Z., Zhang, G., Huang, T., & Fan, D.
Affiliations
  • Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
  • Peking University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Huang, Tao
  • Fan, Dongsheng
Venue
BMC Neurology
Published
2022-01-03
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
8-8
ISSN
1471-2377 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4225262245
Cited by
31
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (81873784, 81030019)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
Keywords
amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, gut microbiota, bidirectional relationship, Enterobacteriaceae, Sutterella, Lactobacillales, gut-brain axis, microbiome metabolites, ALS risk
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis, Humans, Causality, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genome-Wide Association Study, Mendelian Randomization Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review