Cited by 43Neonatal Respiratory Health ResearchInfant Development and Preterm CareMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Bubble CPAP to support preterm infants in rural Rwanda: a retrospective cohort study

Open access
Nahimana, Evrard, Ngendahayo, Masudi, Magge, Hema, Odhiambo, Jackline, Amoroso, Cheryl L., Muhirwa, Ernest, Uwilingiyemungu, Jean Nepo, Nkikabahizi, Fulgence +2 more·2015·BMC Pediatrics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Complications from premature birth contribute to 35% of neonatal deaths globally; therefore, efforts to improve clinical outcomes of preterm (PT) infants are imperative. Bubble continuous positive airway pressure (bCPAP) is a low-cost, effective way to improve the respiratory status of preterm and very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. However, bCPAP remains largely inaccessible in resource-limited settings, and information on the scale-up of this technology in rural health facilities is limited. This paper describes health providers' adherence to bCPAP protocols for PT/VLBW infants and clinical outcomes in rural Rwanda. METHODS: This retrospective chart review included all newborns admitted to neonatal units in three rural hospitals in Rwanda between February 1st and October 31st, 2013. Analysis was restricted to PT/VLBW infants. bCPAP eligibility, identification of bCPAP eligibility and complications were assessed. Final outcome was assessed overall and by bCPAP initiation status. RESULTS: There were 136 PT/VLBW infants. For the 135 whose bCPAP eligibility could be determined, 83 (61.5%) were bCPAP-eligible. Of bCPAP-eligible infants, 49 (59.0%) were correctly identified by health providers and 43 (51.8%) were correctly initiated on bCPAP. For the 52 infants who were not bCPAP-eligible, 45 (86.5%) were correctly identified as not bCPAP-eligible, and 46 (88.5%) did not receive bCPAP. Overall, 90 (66.2%) infants survived to discharge, 35 (25.7%) died, 3 (2.2%) were referred for tertiary care and 8 (5.9%) had unknown outcomes. Among the bCPAP eligible infants, the survival rates were 41.8% (18 of 43) for those in whom the procedure was initiated and 56.5% (13 of 23) for those in whom it was not initiated. No complications of bCPAP were reported. CONCLUSION: While the use of bCPAP in this rural setting appears feasible, correct identification of eligible newborns was a challenge. Mentorship and refresher trainings may improve guideline adherence, particularly given high rates of staff turnover. Future research should explore implementation challenges and assess the impact of bCPAP on long-term outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12887-015-0449-x

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nahimana, E., Ngendahayo, M., Magge, H., Odhiambo, J., Amoroso, C. L., Muhirwa, E., Uwilingiyemungu, J. N., Nkikabahizi, F., Habimana, R., & Hedt-Gauthier, B. L.
Affiliations
  • Partners In Health (US)
  • Ministry of Health (RW)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Nahimana, Evrard
Venue
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2015-09-24
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
135-135
ISSN
1471-2431 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2130620173
Cited by
43
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Pediatrics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Neonatal Respiratory Health Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
bubble continuous positive airway pressure, preterm infants, very low birth weight infants, neonatal respiratory support, guideline adherence, health professions education, neonatal mortality, rural health facilities, resource-limited settings, Rwanda
MeSH terms
Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Male, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn, Retrospective Studies, Rural Population, Rwanda, Incidence, Survival Rate, Infant, Very Low Birth Weight, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review