Cited by 199Sleep and related disordersPsychometric Methodologies and TestingAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 60 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Validation of the German version of the insomnia severity index in adolescents, young adults and adult workers: results from three cross-sectional studies

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A variety of objective and subjective methods exist to assess insomnia. The Insomnia Severity Index (ISI) was developed to provide a brief self-report instrument useful to assess people's perception of sleep complaints. The ISI was developed in English, and has been translated into several languages including German. Surprisingly, the psychometric properties of the German version have not been evaluated, although the ISI is often used with German-speaking populations. METHODS: The psychometric properties of the ISI are tested in three independent samples: 1475 adolescents, 862 university students, and 533 police and emergency response service officers. In all three studies, participants provide information about insomnia (ISI), sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index), and psychological functioning (diverse instruments). Descriptive statistics, gender differences, homogeneity and internal consistency, convergent validity, and factorial validity (including measurement invariance across genders) are examined in each sample. RESULTS: The findings show that the German version of the ISI has generally acceptable psychometric properties and sufficient concurrent validity. Confirmatory factor analyses show that a 1-factor solution achieves good model fit. Furthermore, measurement invariance across gender is supported in all three samples. CONCLUSIONS: While the ISI has been widely used in German-speaking countries, this study is the first to provide empirical evidence that the German version of this instrument has good psychometric properties and satisfactory convergent and factorial validity across various age groups and both men and women. Thus, the German version of the ISI can be recommended as a brief screening measure in German-speaking populations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-016-0876-8

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Factor Loadings For Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Males (First Coefficient) and Females (Second Coefficient), Separately for Study 1, 2 and 3
Fig. 1 Factor Loadings For Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Males (First Coefficient) and Females (Second Coefficient), Separately for Study 1, 2 and 3CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Nunnally J, Bernstein B. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
  2. Backhaus J, Riemann D. Schlafstörungen bewältigen [Coping with sleep disorders]. Weinheim: Beltz Psychologie Verlags Union; 1996.
  3. Von Zerssen D. Depressivitäts-Skala [Depression scale]. Göttingen: Hogrefe; 1976.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 199

Metadata

Authors
Gerber, M., Lang, C., Lemola, S., Colledge, F., Kalak, N., Holsboer-Trachsler, E., Pühse, U., & Brand, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Warwick (GB)
Corresponding author
Gerber, Markus
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2016-05-31
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
174-174
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2417740879
Cited by
199
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3
FWCI
21.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • edoc (University of Basel) (submittedVersion)
  • PUB – Publications at Bielefeld University (Bielefeld University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Freiwillige Akademische Gesellschaft
  • Police Management of the Basel Police Force
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
Insomnia Severity Index, German translation, psychometric validation, insomnia, sleep quality, measurement invariance, gender differences, adolescents, young adults, police officers, emergency response workers, screening tool, self-report questionnaire
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Sleep, Translating, Reproducibility of Results, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review