Cited by 42Digital Mental Health InterventionsMental Health Research TopicsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Self-monitoring and personalized feedback based on the experiencing sampling method as a tool to boost depression treatment: a protocol of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (ZELF-i)

Open access
Bastiaansen, Jojanneke A., Meurs, Maaike, Stelwagen, Renee, Wunderink, Lex, Schoevers, Robert A., Wichers, Marieke, Oldehinkel, Albertine J.·2018·BMC Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Depression is a leading cause of disability worldwide. To reduce the societal burden and improve quality of life for individual patients, treatments for depression need to be optimized. There is a particular need for person-tailored interventions that reinforce self-management of patients. Systematic self-monitoring and personalized feedback through the Experience Sampling Method (ESM) could provide such a person-tailored, empowering intervention that enhances treatment outcomes. The primary aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy of self-monitoring and personalized feedback as an add-on tool in the treatment of depressive complaints in a natural setting. METHODS: The ZELF-i study is a pragmatic multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT). We aim to recruit 150 individuals with depressive symptoms aged between 18 and 65 years, who have an intake for outpatient basic or specialized treatment at a mental health care organization in the North of the Netherlands. After the intake, participants will be randomly allocated to one of three study arms: two experimental groups engaging in 28 days of systematic self-monitoring (5 times per day) and receiving weekly personalized feedback on positive affect and activities ("Do"-module) or on negative affect and thinking patterns ("Think"-module), and a control group receiving no additional intervention. Self-report inventories of depressive symptoms, psychosocial functioning and feelings of empowerment will be administered before and after the intervention period, and at follow-up measurements at 1, 2, 3 and 6 months. The patient-experienced utility of the intervention will be investigated by a combination of quantitative and qualitative research methods. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first to examine the effects of add-on self-monitoring and personalized feedback on depressive complaints in clinical practice. It is also the first to evaluate two different ESM modules targeted at both of depression's core symptoms. Lastly, it is the first study that uses a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate the patient-experienced utility of ESM with personalized feedback as an intervention for depression. Results of the present study may improve treatment for depression, if the intervention is found to be effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Dutch Trial Register, NTR5707 , registered prospectively 1 February 2016.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12888-018-1847-z

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies that apply non-personalized experience sampling method questionnaires in clinical samples, including those from our own group, have used a similar or higher number of questions, and compliance rates suggest a manageable burden for participants.

    “Studies that apply (non-personalized) ESM questionnaires in clinical samples, including those from our own group, have used a similar or higher number of questions [32–35], and compliance rates suggest a manageable burden for participants.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [16]Beck AT Rush AJ Shaw B Emery G Cognitive therapy of depression 1987 New York Guilford Press
  2. [35]Lambert MJ. The outcome Questionnaire-45. In: integrating science and practice. Ordre des psychologues du Quebec. 2012;2(2):24–7.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bastiaansen, J. A., Meurs, M., Stelwagen, R., Wunderink, L., Schoevers, R. A., Wichers, M., & Oldehinkel, A. J.
Affiliations
  • University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
  • GGZ Friesland (NL)
Corresponding author
Bastiaansen, Jojanneke A.
Venue
BMC Psychiatry
Published
2018-09-03
Volume
18
Issue
1
Pages
276-276
ISSN
1471-244X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889739144
Cited by
42
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Gratama Stichting (2015-05)
  • Stichting tot Steun Vereniging tot Christelijke Verzorging van Geestes- en Zenuwzieken (239)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
depression, self-monitoring, personalized feedback, ecological momentary assessment, add-on intervention, self-management, positive affect, negative affect, empowerment, outpatient psychiatric care
MeSH terms
Ecological Momentary Assessment, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Netherlands, Outpatients, Power, Psychological, Quality of Life, Research Design, Self Care, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review