Cited by 58Nutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral Health and InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

Transtheoretical model-based nutritional interventions in adolescents: a systematic review

Open access
Nakabayashi, Jennifer, Melo, Giselle Rha-isa, Toral, Natacha·2020·BMC Public Health

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Background: Literature has shown a tendency of inadequate dietary intake among youth, consequently, nutritional interventions are required. The transtheoretical model (TTM) classifies individuals based on their readiness to change. This model is widely used for health education interventions with proven efficacy. Purpose: This review aimed to weigh the strength of evidence about the TTM usage in nutritional interventions for adolescents and its effectiveness regarding dietary intake. Methods: This study followed the PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies were input into Mendeley software. The Adolec, Google Scholar, LILACS, PsycINFO, PubMed, Science Direct and Web of Science databases were searched. Only full original articles written in English, Spanish or Portuguese on randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs that applied the TTM in the design of nutritional interventions targeting adolescents were included, with no restrictions on publication date. The quality and risk of bias was evaluated with the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Results: The initial search yielded 3779 results. Three studies were rated as strong, six as moderate and five as weak. The final sample of 14 articles included adolescents that were mostly recruited from schools, with interventions ranging from one month to three years. The TTM was used alone or combined with other behavior-change theories and most of the interventions involved digital technology. The nutritional topics covered included fruit and vegetable consumption, low-fat diet, and cooking skills. Four studies presented improvement in fruit and vegetable consumption and four progressed through stages of change. Participants from two interventions reduced fat intake. At the end of one intervention, all the participants were in action and maintenance stages. Conclusion: The TTM seems to be a successful strategy for nutritional intervention aiming at improving dietary intake in adolescents. Its application in different contexts shows that the TTM is flexible and possible to be implemented in many settings. The use of the model is shown to be restricted to the stage of change’ construct. Further studies should use all constructs of the TTM in the design and compare the TTM with other behavior-change theories to better understand its effectiveness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-020-09643-z

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Seven high-quality and one moderate-quality reviews (including 192 unique studies) reported promising effects of multi-component interventions on healthy eating behaviour.

    “There were promising effects of multi-component interventions on healthy eating behaviour reported in seven high-quality [30, 32, 35–38, 45] and one moderate-quality reviews [42] (including 192 unique studies) [30, 32, 35–38, 42, 45].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (page not provided) say this review included 17 articles covering 14 interventions, not eight reviews covering 192 unique studies. Its Methodological quality section rates interventions—not reviews—as three strong, six moderate and five weak. The Main outcomes section does report some improvements in eating behaviour, but not the claimed review-level finding. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The intervention duration ranged from 15 min to 10 years, and follow-up assessments ranged from immediately to four years after the intervention.

    “The intervention duration ranged from 15 min to 10 years [30, 36–38, 42, 45] and time of the follow up assessments ranged from immediately to four years after the intervention [30, 32, 36, 37, 42].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results section ('Study design characteristics'; page unavailable) says study duration, including pre- and post-test measurements, ranged from one month to three years—not 15 minutes to 10 years. The Results table ('Intervention strategies and measured variables'; page unavailable) lists follow-up assessments as late as three years in an example, but the paper does not report the claimed four-year endpoint. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • All the reviews included studies based in HICs, and only eight reviews included a few studies based in five LMICs.

    “All the reviews included studies based in HICs, and only eight reviews included a few studies based in five LMICs [30, 35–38, 42, 43, 45].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results table lists studies from the United States and Brazil, so this review includes studies from both a high-income country and a lower- or middle-income country. This paper reviews adolescent nutritional interventions; it does not establish the sentence’s totals of eight reviews and five LMICs across reviews. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • These reviews mainly focused on interventions in HICs, with only 11 primary studies from LMICs (Ethiopia, India, Iran, Kenya, and Tunisia).

    “These reviews mainly focused on interventions in HICs - only 11 primary studies were from LMICs (Ethiopia, India, Iran, Kenya, and Tunisia) [30, 35–38, 42, 45].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results report 14 interventions, and Table 1 lists studies from Iran and the United States, supporting the broad point that the review includes both LMIC and HIC settings. This paper does not establish the citing sentence’s aggregate count of 11 LMIC primary studies across multiple reviews or its five-country list; Table 1 also lists interventions in Brazil. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The primary outcomes for the reviews reporting promising effects were intake of FV, processed snacks, SSB, fat, protein, fibre and vitamins, frequency of regular meals, recommended calorie intake, healthy eating knowledge, and staying in school for having healthy lunch.

    “The primary outcomes for these reviews were intake of FV [30, 32, 36–38, 42, 45], processed snacks [30, 36–38, 45], SSB [30, 35, 37], fat [37, 42], protein, fibre and vitamins [37], frequency of regular meals [30, 37, 38], recommended calorie intake [37, 42], healthy eating knowledge [30, 36], and staying in school for having healthy lunch [38].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [42]

    The Results (Main outcomes; no page number in our copy) report fruit-and-vegetable and fat intake outcomes. The Other outcomes subsection reports reduced daily calorie intake, but not whether participants met a recommended calorie intake. The review does not report processed-snack or sugar-sweetened-beverage intake, protein, fibre or vitamin intake, or regular-meal frequency as outcomes of the reviewed interventions. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 49 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [3]Ames SL Wurpts IC Pike J MacKinnon DP Reynolds KR Stacy AW Self-regulation interventions for the reduction of sugar-sweetened beverages in adolescents Appetite 2016 105 652 662 27374899 PMC5443114
  2. [12]Celis-Moralez C Livingstone KM Marsaux CFM Macready AL Fallaize R O’Donovan CB Int J Epidemiol 2017 46 2 578 588 27524815

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nakabayashi, J., Melo, G. R.-I., & Toral, N.
Affiliations
Universidade de Brasília (BR)
Corresponding author
Nakabayashi, Jennifer
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2020-10-14
Volume
20
Issue
1
Pages
1543-1543
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3093396767
Cited by
58
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
transtheoretical model, dietary intervention, adolescents, dietary intake, fruit and vegetable intake, low-fat diet, cooking skills, stages of change, readiness to change, behavior change, school-based intervention, digital health technologies
MeSH terms
Transtheoretical Model, Adolescent, Diet, Fruit, Health Education, Humans, Nutrition Disorders, Schools, Vegetables, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review