Cited by 353Behavioral Health and InterventionsPhysical Activity and HealthBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Efficacy of theory-based interventions to promote physical activity. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Gourlan, M., Bernard, P., Bortolon, C., Romain, A. J., Lareyre, O., Carayol, M., Ninot, G., Boiché, J.·2016·Health Psychology Review

Abstract

Implementing theory-based interventions is an effective way to influence physical activity (PA) behaviour in the population. This meta-analysis aimed to (1) determine the global effect of theory-based randomised controlled trials dedicated to the promotion of PA among adults, (2) measure the actual efficacy of interventions against their theoretical objectives and (3) compare the efficacy of single- versus combined-theory interventions. A systematic search through databases and review articles was carried out. Our results show that theory-based interventions (k = 82) significantly impact the PA behaviour of participants (d = 0.31, 95% CI [0.24, 0.37]). While moderation analyses revealed no efficacy difference between theories, interventions based on a single theory (d = 0.35; 95% CI [0.26, 0.43]) reported a higher impact on PA behaviour than those based on a combination of theories (d = 0.21; 95% CI [0.11, 0.32]). In spite of the global positive effect of theory-based interventions on PA behaviour, further research is required to better identify the specificities, overlaps or complementarities of the components of interventions based on relevant theories.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17437199.2014.981777

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gourlan, M., Bernard, P., Bortolon, C., Romain, A. J., Lareyre, O., Carayol, M., Ninot, G., & Boiché, J.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montpellier (FR)
  • Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR)
Corresponding author
Gourlan, M.
Venue
Health Psychology Review
Published
2015-04-10
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
50-66
ISSN
  • 1743-7199 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-7202
OpenAlex
W1980110190
Cited by
353
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 48 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 2
FWCI
1.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
theory-based intervention, physical activity promotion, physical activity behavior, behaviour change theory, intervention efficacy, adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Models, Psychological, Psychological Theory, Health Behavior, Exercise, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review