Cited by 29Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDiabetes Management and EducationMedication Adherence and Compliance

Digital messaging to support control for type 2 diabetes (StAR2D): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Open access
Farmer, A., Bobrow, K., Leon, N., Williams, N., Phiri, E., Namadingo, H., Cooper, S., Prince, J. +11 more·2021·BMC Public Health

Abstract

Background: Failure to take medicines for diabetes as prescribed contributes to poor outcomes from the condition. Mobile phones are ubiquitous and short message service (SMS) texts have shown promise as a low-cost intervention. We tested the effectiveness of SMS-text messaging in improving outcomes in adults with type 2 diabetes. Methods: StAR2D was a 12-month two-arm randomised trial of SMS-text messaging and usual care in Cape Town, South Africa and Lilongwe, Malawi. Messages used behaviour change theory and were developed with patients and staff. The intervention group received four messages each week. The primary outcome was change in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were the proportion of patients who collected > 80% medication and changes in systolic blood pressure, lipids, cardiovascular risk, and the proportion of the participants reaching treatment goals. Results: The trial took place between 1 October, 2016 and 1 October 2018, 1186 participants were randomised to intervention (593) and control (593) groups. 91% of participants completed follow-up. There was a reduction in HbA1c (DCCT) in both groups but not in mean change (95% CI) between groups (− 0.08% (− 0.31 to 0.16) (IFCC − 0.82 mmol/mol (− 3.44 to 1.79). There was a small but not significant increase in the proportions of participants likely to have collected 80% or more of medication (Relative risk 1.11 (0.84 to 1.47; P = 0.47). There was a significant difference between groups in change in systolic blood pressure from baseline of 3.46 mmHg (1.48 to 5.44, P = 0.001) in favour of the intervention group. The between group difference in change in 10-year risk of coronary heart disease was − 0.71% (− 1.46 to 0.04, P = 0.064). The proportion of participants meeting treatment goals in the intervention group was 36.0% and in the control group 26.8% (Relative risk 1.36 (1.13 to 1.63, P = 0.001). Participants reported many challenges to adherence despite finding messages acceptable and useful. Conclusions: Whilst SMS text messages do not lead to improved glycaemia in these low-resource settings there appeared to be an impact on blood pressure and achievement of treatment goals but the mechanisms for this are unclear. Text messages alone, may be unsuccessful unless accompanied by health system strengthening and other forms of self-management support for type 2 diabetes. Trial registration: Trial registration: ISRCTN, ISRCTN70768808. Registered 1 July 2015, http://www.isrctn.com/I ISRCTN70768808.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-021-11874-7

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most SMS-based interventions are pilot tested (stage 3) or at large scale implementation stage (stage 4).

    “most SMS based interventions are pilot tested (stage 3) [31,34,37,38,42,71] or at large scale implementation stage (stage 4) [28 -30,32,35].”

    From Current evidence on the use of mHealth approaches in Sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review (2023) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says StAR2D tested SMS messaging at scale, and the Methods describe a multicentre randomised trial. This supports citing it as an example of a large-scale SMS intervention, but the paper does not identify it as a stage 4 implementation; nor does one trial establish what stage most interventions have reached. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farmer, A., Bobrow, K., Leon, N., Williams, N., Phiri, E., Namadingo, H., Cooper, S., Prince, J., Crampin, A., Besada, D., Daviaud, E., Yu, L.-M., N’goma, J., Springer, D., Pauly, B., Tarassenko, L., Norris, S., Nyirenda, M., & Levitt, N.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Malawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit (MW)
  • Boston Consulting Group (United States) (US)
  • Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital (ZA)
Corresponding author
Farmer, A.
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2021-10-21
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
1907-1907
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3204911885
Cited by
29
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2
FWCI
3.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open University of Cape Town (University of Cape Town) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Medical Research Council (MR/M016498/1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
Keywords
type 2 diabetes, safety management systems, mobile health, medication adherence, HbA1c, glycemic control, behaviour change theory, systolic blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, treatment goals, South Africa, Malawi, resource-limited settings, digital health interventions, patient acceptability, barriers to adherence, patient-centered care
MeSH terms
Adult, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Humans, South Africa, Cell Phone, Medication Adherence, Text Messaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review