Cited by 50Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Management and Research

A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of telemedicine in glycemic management among patients with type 2 diabetes in primary care

Open access
Zhang, Anqi, Wang, Jinsong, Wan, Xiaojuan, Zhang, Ziyi, Zhao, Shuhan, Guo, Zihe, Wang, Chufan·2022·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

Introduction: Telemedicine interventions are gradually being used in primary health care to help patients with type 2 diabetes receive ongoing medical guidance. The purpose of this study was to analyze the effectiveness of using telemedicine in primary health care for the management of patients with type 2 diabetes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from database inception to August 2021 in nine databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, EBSCO, CNKI, Wanfang Data, VIP, and CBM. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed for studies that met the inclusion criteria. The meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager 5.4 (Cochrane) and Stata v.16.0SE (College Station, TX, USA). Results: A total of 32 articles were included in this study. Analysis showed a reduction in glycated hemoglobin, fasting glucose, and postprandial glucose after the telemedicine intervention. Systolic blood pressure and self-efficacy improved significantly, but there was no significant improvement in weight, lipid metabolism, or diabetes awareness. Subgroup analysis based on the duration of intervention showed significant improvement in glycated hemoglobin at 6 months of intervention. Conclusions: Telemedicine interventions may help patients with type 2 diabetes to effectively control blood glucose and improve self-management in primary health care. There is only moderate benefit, and the benefit may not be sustained beyond 6 months. However, the evidence for the improvement in lipid metabolism is insufficient and further studies are needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph19074173

Cites

73 of 73 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) CASP Checklists from Oxford Available online: https://casp-uk.net/casp-tools-checklists/ (accessed on 20 September 2021)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, A., Wang, J., Wan, X., Zhang, Z., Zhao, S., Guo, Z., & Wang, C.
Affiliations
  • Yangzhou University (CN)
  • Yangzhou Commission of Health, Yangzhou 225000, China
Corresponding author
Wang, Jinsong
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-03-31
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
4173
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220984801
Cited by
50
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
Cadre Health Care Research Project of Jiangsu (BJ17011)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
Keywords
telemedicine, type 2 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, blood pressure, self-efficacy, diabetes self-management, primary care, intervention duration
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Primary Health Care, Telemedicine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review