Cited by 43Physical Activity and HealthSchool Health and Nursing EducationPhysical Education and Pedagogy

Co-design of a school-based physical activity intervention for adolescent females in a disadvantaged community: insights from the Girls Active Project (GAP)

Open access
McQuinn, Sara, Belton, Sarahjane, Staines, Anthony, Sweeney, Mary Rose·2022·BMC Public Health

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Globally, adolescents' physical activity (PA) participation rates are low, particularly among lower socioeconomic groups, with females consistently the least active. The aim of this study was to co-design, with adolescent females, a school-based PA intervention in a single-sex, females-only designated disadvantaged post-primary school in Ireland. This involved using the Behaviour Change Wheel (BCW) and Public and Patient Involvement (PPI). This paper outlines the novel methodological approach taken. METHODS: The three stages 1) understand the behaviour, 2) identify intervention options, and 3) identify content and implementation options of the BCW guide is described. A student PPI Youth Advisory Group (YAG) (n = 8, aged 15-17) was established. Mixed-methods were used with students (n = 287, aged 12-18) and teachers (n = 7) to capture current self-reported PA levels and to identify factors influencing adolescent females' PA behaviour in their school setting. The intervention options, content and implementation options were identified through discussion groups with the YAG. The Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) checklist was used to specify details of the intervention. RESULTS: Just 1.4% of the students in this sample reported meeting the recommended PA guidelines. Students identified having more 'time' as the strongest predictor to becoming more active in school (Mean = 4.01, 95% CI 3.91 to 4.12). Social influences, environmental context and resources, behavioural regulation, beliefs about capabilities, goals, and reinforcement emerged from the qualitative data as factors influencing PA behaviour at school. The BCW co-design process resulted in the identification of seven intervention functions, four policy categories and 21 Behaviour Change Techniques. The Girls Active Project (GAP) intervention, a peer-led, after-school PA programme was proposed. CONCLUSIONS: This paper describes how the BCW, a comprehensive, evidence-based, theory-driven framework was used in combination with PPI to co-design a school-based intervention aimed to increase adolescent females' PA levels. This approach could be replicated in other settings to develop targeted behavioural interventions in populations with specific demographic characteristics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12889-022-12635-w

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Engaging key stakeholders, including adolescents, parents, teachers, and policy experts, in intervention design ensures tailoring to adolescents' needs, feasibility, and successful implementation.

    “Empirical evidence suggests that engaging key stakeholders, including adolescents, parents, teachers, and policy experts, in intervention design ensures tailoring to adolescents’ needs, feasibility, and successful implementation [57–59].”

    From School-based healthy eating interventions for adolescents aged 10–19 years: an umbrella review (2024) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Methods (Study design; page not provided) describe involving adolescent girls and teachers, and the Discussion (Intervention development; page not provided) says the co-design process matched intervention options to students’ preferences and needs. The paper does not show parents or policy experts participating in the design, nor does it establish that stakeholder engagement ensures feasibility or successful implementation; it reports registration of a feasibility trial, not its outcome. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]Woods C, Powell C, Saunders J, O’Brien W, Murphy M, Duff C, et al. The Children’s Sport Participation and Physical Activity Study 2018 (CSPPA 2018): Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland, Sport Ireland, and Healthy Ireland, Dublin, Ireland and Sport Northern Ireland, Belfast, Northern Ireland; 2018. Cited 2020 Jan 30. Available from: https://www.sportireland.ie/research/csppa-2018.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McQuinn, S., Belton, S., Staines, A., & Sweeney, M. R.
Affiliations
Dublin City University (IE)
Corresponding author
McQuinn, Sara
Venue
BMC Public Health
Published
2022-03-29
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
615-615
ISSN
1471-2458 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4220835664
Cited by
43
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5
FWCI
4.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dublin City University Open Access Institutional Repository (Dublin City University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Health Research Board (SPHeRE/2013/1)
  • Dublin City University
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › School Health and Nursing Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Physical Education and Pedagogy
Keywords
adolescent physical activity, adolescent girls, school-based intervention, co-design, Behaviour Change Wheel, patient and public involvement, disadvantaged communities, behaviour change techniques, time constraints, TIDieR checklist
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Motor Activity, Problem Solving, Schools, Exercise

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review