Cited by 175Simulation-Based Education in HealthcareInnovations in Medical EducationSurgical Simulation and Training

Simulation based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: an example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education

Open access
Makransky, Guido, Bonde, Mads T., Wulff, Julie S. G., Wandall, Jakob, Hood, Michelle, Creed, Peter A., Bache, Iben, Silahtaroglu, Asli +1 more·2016·BMC Medical Education

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Simulation based learning environments are designed to improve the quality of medical education by allowing students to interact with patients, diagnostic laboratory procedures, and patient data in a virtual environment. However, few studies have evaluated whether simulation based learning environments increase students' knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy, and help them generalize from laboratory analyses to clinical practice and health decision-making. METHODS: An entire class of 300 University of Copenhagen first-year undergraduate students, most with a major in medicine, received a 2-h training session in a simulation based learning environment. The main outcomes were pre- to post- changes in knowledge, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy, together with post-intervention evaluation of the effect of the simulation on student understanding of everyday clinical practice were demonstrated. RESULTS: Knowledge (Cohen's d = 0.73), intrinsic motivation (d = 0.24), and self-efficacy (d = 0.46) significantly increased from the pre- to post-test. Low knowledge students showed the greatest increases in knowledge (d = 3.35) and self-efficacy (d = 0.61), but a non-significant increase in intrinsic motivation (d = 0.22). The medium and high knowledge students showed significant increases in knowledge (d = 1.45 and 0.36, respectively), motivation (d = 0.22 and 0.31), and self-efficacy (d = 0.36 and 0.52, respectively). Additionally, 90 % of students reported a greater understanding of medical genetics, 82 % thought that medical genetics was more interesting, 93 % indicated that they were more interested and motivated, and had gained confidence by having experienced working on a case story that resembled the real working situation of a doctor, and 78 % indicated that they would feel more confident counseling a patient after the simulation. CONCLUSIONS: The simulation based learning environment increased students' learning, intrinsic motivation, and self-efficacy (although the strength of these effects differed depending on their pre-test knowledge), and increased the perceived relevance of medical educational activities. The results suggest that simulations can help future generations of doctors transfer new understanding of disease mechanisms gained in virtual laboratory settings into everyday clinical practice.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12909-016-0620-6

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. [1]Duffy FD Gordon GH Whelan G Assessing competence in communication and interpersonal skills: the Kalamazoo II report Acad Med 2004 79 495 507 10.1097/00001888-200406000-00002 15165967 · DOI
  2. [2]Sung NS Crowley WF Genel M Central challenges facing the national clinical research enterprise J Am Med Assoc 2003 289 10 1278 10.1001/jama.289.10.1278 12633190 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]De Jong T Linn MC Zacharia ZC Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education Science 2013 340 6130 305 8 10.1126/science.1230579 23599479 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [5]Weller JM Simulation in undergraduate medical education: bridging the gap between theory and practice Med Educ 2004 38 1 32 8 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2004.01739.x 14962024 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [7]Kember D Ho A Hong C The importance of establishing relevance in motivating student learning Act Learn High Educ 2008 9 3 249 10.1177/1469787408095849 · DOI
  6. [8]Kurpinski K Johnson T Kumar S Desai T Li S Mastering translational medicine: interdisciplinary education for a new generation Sci Transl Med 2014 6 218 218fs2 10.1126/scitranslmed.3006858 24401938 · DOI
  7. [9]Chakravarthy B Ter Haar E Bhat S McCoy CE Denmark TK Lotfipour S Simulation in medical school education: review for emergency medicine West J Emerg Med 2011 12 461 6 10.5811/westjem.2010.10.1909 22224138 PMC3236168 · DOI
  8. [10]Honey MA Hilton M Learning science through computer games and simulations. Vol 42. (National Research Council, ed.) 2011 Washington, DC The National Academies Press
  9. [12]McGaghie WC Issenberg SB Petrusa ER Scalese RJ A critical review of simulation-based medical education research: 2003–2009 Med Educ 2010 44 50 63 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03547.x 20078756 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [13]McGaghie WC Issenberg SB Cohen ER Barsuk JH Wayne DB Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results that traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence Acad Med 2011 86 6 706 11 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318217e119 21512370 PMC3102783 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Issenberg SB McGaghie WC Hart IR Simulation technology for health care professional skills training and assessment JAMA 1999 282 9 861 6 10.1001/jama.282.9.861 10478693 · DOI
  12. [20]Rosen KR McBride JM Drake RL The use of simulation in medical education to enhance students’ understanding of basic sciences Med Teach 2009 31 9 842 6 10.1080/01421590903049822 19811190 · DOI
  13. [21]Polly P, Marcus N, Maguire D, Belinson Z, Velan GM. Evaluation of an adaptive virtual laboratory environment using Western Blotting for diagnosis of disease. BMC Medical Education. 2014:1–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6920-14-222. Accessed 23 March 2016. PMC4287185 25331335 · DOI · Paper page
  14. [24]Metcalf MP Tanner TB Buchanan A Effectiveness of an online curriculum for medical students on genetics, genetic testing and counseling Med Educ Online 2010 15 1 12 10.3402/meo.v15i0.4856 PMC2823389 20174615 · DOI
  15. [25]Cook DA Erwin PJ Triola MM Computerized virtual patients in health professions education: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acad Med 2010 85 1589 602 10.1097/ACM.0b013e3181edfe13 20703150 · DOI · Paper page
  16. [26]Telner DE Carroll JC Talbot Y Genetics education in medical school: a qualitative study exploring educational experiences and needs Med Teach 2008 30 192 8 10.1080/01421590701827353 18464146 · DOI
  17. [27]Deci E Eghrari H Patrick B Leone D Facilitating internalization: the self-determination theory perspective J Pers 1994 62 1 119 42 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1994.tb00797.x 8169757 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [29]Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Copenhagen Danish Inst Educ Res. Oxford, England: Nielsen & Lydiche Studies in mathematical psychology; 1960.
  19. [30]Zimmerman B Self-efficacy: an essential motive to learn Contemp Educ Psychol 2000 25 1 82 91 10.1006/ceps.1999.1016 10620383 · DOI · Paper page
  20. [32]Burgoon JM Meece JL Granger NA Self-efficacy’s influence on student academic achievement in the medical anatomy curriculum Anat Sci Ed 2012 5 249 55 10.1002/ase.1283 22653759 · DOI
  21. [34]Bieg M Goetz T Hubbard K Can I master it and does it matter? An intraindividual analysis on control-value antecedents of trait and state academic emotions Learn Individ Differ 2013 28 102 8 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.09.006 · DOI · Paper page
  22. [35]Control-value theory of achievement emotions. In: Pekrun R, Linnenbrink-Garcia L, editors. International handbook of emotions in education. New York: Routledge. p. 120–141. https://books.google.dk/books?hl=da&lr=&id=8_UjAwAAQBAJ&oi=fnd&pg=PA120&dq=Control-value+theory+of+achievement+emotions.+In:+Pekrun+R,+Linnenbrink-Garcia+L,+editors.+International+handbook+of+emotions+in+education.+New+York:+Routledge.+p.+120%E2%80%93141.&ots=F9ZUoQbKtu&sig=sFUFjDGuKRIfnV3DLGfE_S8ENVc&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false.
  23. [38]Try Bédard, D., Lison, C., Dalle, D., Côté, D., & Boutin, N. (2012). Problem-based and Project-based Learning in Engineering and Medicine: Determinants of Students’ Engagement and Persistance. Interdisciplinary J Probl Based Learn. 6(2). Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1355. Accessed 23 March 2016. · DOI
  24. [39]Heckman J Kautz T Hard evidence on soft skills Labour Econ 2012 19 451 64 10.1016/j.labeco.2012.05.014 23559694 PMC3612993 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Makransky, G., Bonde, M. T., Wulff, J. S. G., Wandall, J., Hood, M., Creed, P. A., Bache, I., Silahtaroglu, A., & Nørremølle, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Griffith University (AU)
Corresponding author
Makransky, Guido
Venue
BMC Medical Education
Published
2016-03-25
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
98-98
ISSN
1472-6920 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2311619001
Cited by
175
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 4
FWCI
11.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • BMC Medical Education (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Innovation fund Denmark
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Surgical Simulation and Training
Keywords
simulation-based training, virtual learning environments, medical genetics education, intrinsic motivation, self-efficacy, knowledge improvement, theory-practice gap, undergraduate medical students, clinical decision-making, case-based learning
MeSH terms
Curriculum, Educational Measurement, Female, Genetic Counseling, Genetics, Medical, Humans, Male, Motivation, Students, Medical, User-Computer Interface, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review