Cited by 45Physical Activity and HealthMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Applying machine learning to predict future adherence to physical activity programs

Open access
Zhou, Mo, Fukuoka, Yoshimi, Goldberg, Ken, Vittinghoff, Eric, Aswani, Anil·2019·BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Identifying individuals who are unlikely to adhere to a physical exercise regime has potential to improve physical activity interventions. The aim of this paper is to develop and test adherence prediction models using objectively measured physical activity data in the Mobile Phone-Based Physical Activity Education program (mPED) trial. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first to apply Machine Learning methods to predict exercise relapse using accelerometer-recorded physical activity data. METHODS: We use logistic regression and support vector machine methods to design two versions of a Discontinuation Prediction Score (DiPS), which uses objectively measured past data (e.g., steps and goal achievement) to provide a numerical quantity indicating the likelihood of exercise relapse in the upcoming week. The respective prediction accuracy of these two versions of DiPS are compared, and then numerical simulation is performed to explore the potential of using DiPS to selectively allocate financial incentives to participants to encourage them to increase physical activity. RESULTS: we had access to a physical activity trial data that were continuously collected every 60 sec every day for 9 months in 210 participants. By using the first 15 weeks of data as training and test on weeks 16-30, we show that both versions of DiPS have a test AUC of 0.9 with high sensitivity and specificity in predicting the probability of exercise adherence. Simulation results assuming different intervention regimes suggest the potential benefit of using DiPS as a score to allocate resources in physical activity intervention programs in reducing costs over other allocation schemes. CONCLUSIONS: DiPS is capable of making accurate and robust predictions for future weeks. The most predictive features are steps and physical activity intensity. Furthermore, the use of DiPS scores can be a promising approach to determine when or if to provide just-in-time messages and step goal adjustments to improve compliance. Further studies on the use of DiPS in the design of physical activity promotion programs are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01280812 Registered on January 21, 2011.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12911-019-0890-0

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Marlatt GA Gordon JR Relapse prevention: maintenance strategies in addictive behavior change 1985 New York Guilford Press

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhou, M., Fukuoka, Y., Goldberg, K., Vittinghoff, E., & Aswani, A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Zhou, Mo
Venue
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
Published
2019-08-22
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
169-169
ISSN
1472-6947 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2969286020
Cited by
45
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 3
FWCI
3.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • UC Center for Information Technology Research in the Interest of Society
  • Philippine - California Advanced Research Institutes (IIID-2015-07)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL104147)
  • National Institute of Nursing Research (K24NR015812)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity adherence, accelerometer-measured activity, financial incentives, step count, physical activity intensity, support vector machine, logistic regression
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adult, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Patient Compliance, Exercise, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review