Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward AI technology (ChatGPT) among nursing students at Palestinian universities
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: AI can improve medical practice, address staff shortages, and enhance diagnostic efficiency. The ChatGPT of Open AI, launched in 2022, uses AI in medical education. However, the long-term impact is uncertain, and integration varies globally, particularly in the Middle East. AIM: To explore the knowledge, practices, and attitudes of nursing students in Palestinian universities regarding AI, specifically the use of ChatGPT. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study. The study was performed at 8 private and governmental universities in the West Bank, Palestine, from 1st May 2024 to 30 May 2024, and 304 nursing students participated. RESULTS: The study revealed that 84.5% of nursing students at Palestinian universities were aware of AI technology, yet 69.9% lacked formal education or training related to ChatGPT. Despite this gap, 79% supported the integration of AI into nursing curricula and specialized training programs, reflecting strong optimism about its role in education and healthcare. While 58.6% had used AI in their coursework and 68.1% felt comfortable with technology, disparities in proficiency and access remain key barriers to effective AI integration. Major challenges to AI adoption in Palestine include insufficient training, the absence of AI-focused curricula, and financial constraints, underscoring the need for institutional and pedagogical reforms. Concerns about AI's reliability, costs, and potential diagnostic errors persist, emphasizing the complexities of its integration into nursing education and practice. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Palestinian nursing students regarding AI and ChatGPT. It reveals that, despite growing awareness, the lack of formal education on AI underscores the need for comprehensive curricula. While students' express optimism about AI's potential in healthcare, concerns about its reliability and integration persist. The study also reveals that barriers such as inadequate training, limited curricula, and financial constraints must be addressed to effectively integrate AI into nursing education and prepare students for its expanding role in healthcare.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
In a cross-sectional survey of 304 nursing students at eight Palestinian universities, AI awareness was high (84.5%) and support for AI curricula strong (79%), but formal ChatGPT training was low (69.4% none) and clinical use limited (33.9% used ChatGPT in nursing practice). Students were optimistic about AI’s healthcare role yet concerned about reliability and diagnostic errors (62.2% believed AI could increase diagnostic errors), with training, curriculum, and financial barriers cited.
Key findings
- Knowledge: 84.5% knew what AI was, 52.6% were aware of machine learning/deep learning, 53.3% knew of medical AI applications, and 41.8% had been taught AI in college; for ChatGPT, 27.6% were very familiar, 49.0% somewhat familiar, 23.4% not at all familiar, and 69.4% had no training/education related to ChatGPT.
- Attitudes: 82.9% believed AI is essential in the medical field, 79% supported including AI in nursing curricula/specialist training, and 75.4% thought AI introduction is necessary in hospitals/health centers; however, 62.2% believed AI could increase diagnostic errors and 51.7% believed AI will replace healthcare providers. For ChatGPT, 50.7% doubted it can improve patient outcomes, 57.9% thought patients would not be receptive, 47.7% were neutral about incorporating it into practice, 23.0% were anxious, and 19.1% were excited.
- Practices: 58.6% had used AI, 54.3% found AI easy to apply, and 68.1% were comfortable/very comfortable with technology; 33.9% had used ChatGPT in nursing practice, 37.2% felt comfortable using ChatGPT in patient care, and 62.8% did not.
- Barriers and subgroup differences: reduced AI practice in Palestine was attributed to lack of proper training (56.2%), lack of interest (52.6%), lack of awareness (52.3%), lack of curriculum (46%), financial constraints (45%), and lack of technological advancement (26.3%); attitudes differed by university level (p = 0.022; first-year M = 27.25 vs fourth-year M = 29.99), and AI practice differed by age (p = 0.000) and university level (p = 0.000; fourth-year lowest M = 4.25).
Methods
- Cross-sectional design conducted at 8 private and governmental universities in the West Bank, Palestine, from 1 May 2024 to 30 May 2024; 304 nursing students participated via convenience sampling, though Raosoft estimated 367 participants were needed for a 5% margin of error, 95% confidence level, and 50% response distribution.
- Data were collected through an online, self-administered Google Forms questionnaire covering demographics, AI/ChatGPT knowledge, attitudes, and practices; a pilot study with 35 students assessed validity/reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.78 for knowledge, 0.81 for attitudes, and 0.76 for practice.
- Analysis used SPSS Version 27 with descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, SDs) and inferential statistics (independent t tests, one-way ANOVA), with significance set at p < 0.05.
Limitations
- Stated: the cross-sectional design captures a single time point and cannot establish causal relationships; convenience sampling introduces selection bias and limits generalizability; self-reported online data are prone to social desirability and recall bias.
- Stated: limited AI integration in nursing curricula makes it difficult to assess the direct impact of structured AI training; institutional policies, administrative support, and infrastructural challenges are not extensively explored; the study does not extensively analyze how AI tools are integrated into clinical practice or their direct impact on patient care.
- Evident from the text: the final sample of 304 fell short of the Raosoft target of 367; the abstract reports 69.9% lacked formal ChatGPT education while Table 3 reports 69.4%, a minor numerical discrepancy.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
52.6% of students cited lack of interest as a main factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.
“A lack of appropriate training (56.2%) and a lack of interest (52.6%) were the main factors contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
48.3% of students agreed that AI would be a burden.
“With respect to whether AI would be a burden, the students were largely divided, with 48.3% agreeing”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
24.3% of students recognized providing medication reminders as a potential use of ChatGPT in patient care.
“Providing medication reminders | 74 | 24.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
30.6% of students had received training or education related to ChatGPT.
“Yes | 93 | 30.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
27.6% of students were very familiar with ChatGPT.
“Very familiar | 84 | 27.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
56.2% of students cited lack of appropriate training as a main factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.
“A lack of appropriate training (56.2%) and a lack of interest (52.6%) were the main factors contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
53.3% of respondents were aware of AI's uses in the medical field.
“While somewhat more than half of the respondents (53.3%) were aware of AI's uses in the medical field”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
69.4% of students had no formal education or training related to ChatGPT.
“No | 211 | 69.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
13.8% of students disagreed that AI was crucial to the medical field.
“The small minority (13.8%) of them who disagreed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
23.4% of students were not at all familiar with ChatGPT.
“Not at all familiar | 71 | 23.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
51.7% of respondents agreed that AI might replace healthcare providers.
“AI might replace healthcare providers, according to 51.7% of respondents”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
49.7% of students said they had not learned about AI in college.
“nearly half (49.7%) said they had not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
82.9% of students felt that AI was crucial to the medical field.
“The majority of the students (82.9%) felt that AI was crucial to the medical field.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
46.7% of respondents did not know about AI's uses in the medical field.
“a percentage (46.7%) did not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
84.5% of nursing students at Palestinian universities knew what AI was.
“A total of 84.5% of the participants knew what AI was.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
41.8% of students said they had learned about AI in college.
“Fewer than half of the students (41.8%) said they had learned about AI in college”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
49.0% of students were somewhat familiar with ChatGPT.
“Somewhat familiar | 149 | 49.0”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
21.4% of students disagreed that AI helps with disease severity assessment and early diagnosis.
“A total of 21.4% disagreed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
72.3% of students agreed that AI helps with disease severity assessment and early diagnosis.
“The majority (72.3%) agreed that AI helps with disease severity assessment and early diagnosis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
15.1% of students recognized offering emotional support as a potential use of ChatGPT in patient care.
“Offering emotional support | 46 | 15.1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
79% of students were in favor of AI being included in nursing and specialized training programs.
“The majority of the students (79%) were in favor of AI being included in nursing and specialized training programs.”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“79% supported the integration of AI into nursing curricula and specialized training programs”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Results · plain
- Findingown data
62.2% of students felt that AI could increase diagnostic errors.
“the majority (62.2%), who felt that AI could increase diagnostic errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
19.1% of students disagreed that AI had to be included in hospitals and health centers.
“19.1% disagreed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
35.9% of students recognized answering patient questions as a potential use of ChatGPT in patient care.
“Answering patient questions | 109 | 35.9”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
43% of respondents disagreed that AI might replace healthcare providers.
“but 43% disagreed.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
15.4% of respondents were unclear or did not know what AI was.
“A total of 15.4% of the respondents were unclear or did not know what AI was.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
28.6% of students disagreed that AI could increase diagnostic errors.
“Nevertheless, 28.6% disagreed”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
72.4% of participants expressed optimism that AI can enhance the learning process.
“A majority (72.4%) expressed optimism about the potential application of AI in education by believing that it can enhance the learning process.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
21.7% of students recognized conducting initial assessments as a potential use of ChatGPT in patient care.
“Conducting initial assessments | 66 | 21.7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
47.4% of participants were either uncertain or did not know about machine learning and deep learning.
“a notable percentage (47.4%) were either uncertain or did not know.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
40.5% of students disagreed that AI would be a burden.
“and 40.5% disagreeing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Approximately 28% of participants expressed uncertainty about AI's potential in education.
“Even still, approximately 28% expressed uncertainty”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
75.4% of students thought that AI had to be included in hospitals and health centers.
“The majority (75.4%) thought that AI had to be included in hospitals and health centers”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
52.6% of participants were aware of machine learning and deep learning.
“Although slightly more than half (52.6%) of the participants were aware of machine learning and deep learning”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 75.4% agreed that the introduction of artificial intelligence is necessary in hospitals and health centers.
“Do you think the introduction of artificial intelligence is necessary in hospitals and health centers? | 229 | 75.4 | 17 | 5.6 | 58 | 19.1”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 62.8% did not feel comfortable using ChatGPT for patient care.
“Among the students, 62.8% did not feel comfortable using ChatGPT for patient care, whereas 37.2% did.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant change in attitude toward AI depending on where you live (p = 0.486).
“There is no significant change in attitude depending on where you live (p = 0.486).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 25% answered No to having applied AI technology in any field.
“Have you ever applied AI technology in any field? | 178 | 58.6 | 58.6 | 76 | 25.0 | 50 | 16.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 82.9% agreed that AI is essential in the medical field.
“Do you believe AI is essential in medical field? | 252 | 82.9 | 10 | 3.3 | 42 | 13.8”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 57.9% said that patients would not be open to communicating via ChatGPT.
“Most respondents (57.9%) said that patients would not be open to communicating via the ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 75% agreed that budget should be allocated for AI to be used in hospitals and health centers.
“Do you believe budget should be allocated for AI to be used in hospitals and health centers? | 228 | 75 | 16 | 5.3 | 60 | 19.7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 45% cited lack of financial resources as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.
“According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of financial resources | Lack of financial resources | Lack of financial resources | Lack of financial resources | 137 | 45”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 52.6% cited lack of interest as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.
“According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of interest | Lack of interest | Lack of interest | Lack of interest | 160 | 52.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
58.6% of students had used AI in their coursework.
“While 58.6% had used AI in their coursework”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 72.3% agreed that AI aids practitioners in early diagnosis and assessment of severity of disease.
“Do you think that AI aids practitioner in early diagnosis and assessment of severity of disease?* | 220 | 72.3 | 19 | 6.3 | 65 | 21.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 51.7% agreed that AI will replace health care providers in the future.
“Do you believe that AI will replace health care providers in future? | 157 | 51.7 | 16 | 5.3 | 131 | 43”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 24.7% found AI difficult to apply.
“While more than half (54.3%) considered AI simple to use, 24.7% found it difficult, possibly as a result of difficulties with comprehension or application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
26.3% of students considered perception of technological advancement as a factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.
“The perception of technological advancement (26.3%) was considered less significant than other criteria”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 79% agreed that AI should be included in the curriculum in nursing school as well as specialist training.
“Do you think AI should be included in curriculum in nursing school as well as specialist training? | 240 | 79 | 13 | 4.3 | 51 | 16.7”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 47.7% were uncertain about using ChatGPT in their practice.
“A total of 47.7% of them, or nearly half, were uncertain about using the ChatGPT in their practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 48.3% agreed that AI would be a burden for practitioners.
“Do you believe AI would be a burden for practitioner? | 147 | 48.3 | 34 | 11.2 | 123 | 40.5”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in AI knowledge by living place.
“The results of an ANOVA revealed that third-year students aged 23–27 years had high levels of AI knowledge, but there were no significant differences in terms of where they attended university and lived.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 19.1% were excited about incorporating ChatGPT into their practice.
“Only 19.1% of the students were excited, whereas 23% were anxious.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 46% cited lack of curriculum as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.
“According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of curriculum | Lack of curriculum | Lack of curriculum | Lack of curriculum | 140 | 46”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 39 were positive experiences.
“Good Occurrences (n = 39): ChatGPT is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 68.1% reported feeling either extremely comfortable or comfortable using technology.
“The majority of the students (68.1%) reported feeling either extremely comfortable or comfortable using technology.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 54.3% considered AI simple to use.
“While more than half (54.3%) considered AI simple to use, 24.7% found it difficult, possibly as a result of difficulties with comprehension or application.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
ANOVA revealed that third-year students aged 23-27 years had high levels of AI knowledge.
“The results of an ANOVA revealed that third-year students aged 23–27 years had high levels of AI knowledge, but there were no significant differences in terms of where they attended university and lived.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were significant differences between males and females in AI knowledge (p < 0.05) on some items.
“With respect to artificial intelligence and its applications in the medical field, there were significant differences between males and females in terms of female sex (p < 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 62.2% agreed that AI would increase the percentage of errors in diagnosis.
“Do you believe AI would increase the percentage of errors in diagnosis? | 189 | 62.2 | 28 | 9.2 | 87 | 28.6”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 56.2% cited lack of proper training as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.
“According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of proper training | Lack of proper training | Lack of proper training | Lack of proper training | 171 | 56.2”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in attitudes toward AI across age groups (p = 0.144).
“Table 10 shows that there was no significant difference in attitudes across the age groups (p = 0.144).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Of 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 7 were negative experiences.
“Negative Experiences (n = 7): A few people mentioned accuracy problems, called it”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 50.7% expressed doubt that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes.
“With respect to whether ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes, the students were divided almost evenly, with a majority (50.7%) expressing doubt.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 37.2% did feel comfortable using ChatGPT for patient care.
“Among the students, 62.8% did not feel comfortable using ChatGPT for patient care, whereas 37.2% did.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences between males and females in overall AI knowledge.
“However, there were no significant differences in terms of their overall knowledge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 16.4% had never applied AI technology in any field.
“Have you ever applied AI technology in any field? | 178 | 58.6 | 58.6 | 76 | 25.0 | 50 | 16.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no statistically significant difference in attitudes toward AI between males and females (p > 0.05).
“Table 9 shows that there was no statistically significant difference in attitudes between males and females (p > 0.05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 58.6% had applied AI technology in any field.
“Have you ever applied AI technology in any field? | 178 | 58.6 | 58.6 | 76 | 25.0 | 50 | 16.4”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
68.1% of students felt comfortable with technology.
“and 68.1% felt comfortable with technology”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences in AI knowledge by university attended.
“The results of an ANOVA revealed that third-year students aged 23–27 years had high levels of AI knowledge, but there were no significant differences in terms of where they attended university and lived.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Negative experiences with ChatGPT in nursing practice included accuracy problems and wrong answers in the nursing field.
“Negative Experiences (n = 7): A few people mentioned accuracy problems, called it”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among nursing students (n=304), 52.3% cited lack of awareness as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.
“According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of awareness | Lack of awareness | Lack of awareness | Lack of awareness | 159 | 52.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingreasoning
Palestinian nursing students expressed concerns about AI's impact on future job security.
“and its impact on future job security.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference in excited attitudes toward incorporating ChatGPT into practice by university affiliation (p=0.029), in favor of Modern University College, Al-Quds University, and Arab American University.
“The p value is 0.029, indicating a significant difference in excited attitudes toward incorporating ChatGPT into practice on the basis of university affiliation in favor of Modern University College, Al-Qud University and Arab American University.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
58.6% of Palestinian nursing students had used AI.
“In terms of practical application, 58.6% of students had used AI”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Over half of Palestinian nursing students found AI easy to apply in their academic or professional tasks.
“with over half finding it easy to apply in their academic or professional tasks.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference by age in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.015), with younger participants (19-22 years) being more likely to believe this.
“The p value (0.015) was significantly different, with younger participants (19–22 years) being more likely to believe that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant variation in AI usage across residences (p = 0.203).
“There was no significant variation in AI usage across residences (p = 0.203).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
43% of Palestinian nursing students disagree that AI could replace healthcare providers.
“while 43% disagree”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
45% of Palestinian nursing students cited financial constraints as a barrier to AI integration.
“as indicated by 45% of the students citing financial constraints”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was significant variation in ChatGPT knowledge across year levels (p = 0.000).
“The university-level p value is 0.000, indicating significant variation in ChatGPT knowledge across year levels, with fourth-year students being more familiar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Age significantly differed in AI practice (p = 0.000).
“Age did, however, significantly differ in AI practice (p = 0.000), with the 23–27 age group exhibiting the lowest levels of practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Attitudes toward AI varied significantly across university levels (p = 0.022).
“The attitudes toward AI varied significantly across university levels (p = 0.022).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no statistically significant difference in AI practices between males and females (p = 0.108).
“There was no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05) in the difference in AI practices between males and females, as indicated by a p value of 0.108.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
69% of Palestinian nursing students reported no formal education on ChatGPT use.
“Similarly, knowledge of ChatGPT followed the same pattern, with 69% of students reporting no formal education on its use.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
33.9% of Palestinian nursing students had used ChatGPT in their nursing practice.
“Despite this engagement with AI, only 33.9% of students had used ChatGPT in their nursing practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fourth-year students exhibited the least amount of AI practice (M = 4.25).
“There was a significant difference between university levels (p = 0.000), with fourth-year students exhibiting the least amount of practice (M = 4.25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among Palestinian nursing students, there were statistically significant differences by university affiliation in optimism about patient receptivity to interacting with ChatGPT (p=0.018), in favor of Modern University College, Al-Quds University, and Arab American University.
“and university affiliation (p = 0. 018) in favor of Modern University College, Al-Quds University and Arab American University, respectively”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant difference in AI practice between university levels (p = 0.000).
“There was a significant difference between university levels (p = 0.000), with fourth-year students exhibiting the least amount of practice (M = 4.25).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in AI practices with respect to university (p = 0.694).
“With respect to university, there was no significant difference in AI practices (p = 0.694).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant variation in ChatGPT knowledge based on living place (p = 0.056).
“There was no significant variation in ChatGPT knowledge based on living place, as indicated by the p value of 0.056 for living place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Fourth-year students were more familiar with ChatGPT.
“The university-level p value is 0.000, indicating significant variation in ChatGPT knowledge across year levels, with fourth-year students being more familiar.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
46.7% of Palestinian nursing students are unfamiliar with AI's applications in the medical field.
“The study identified a significant knowledge gap, with 46.7% of respondents unfamiliar with AI’s applications in the medical field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The institutions with highest ChatGPT knowledge were Al Quds University, Modern University College, and Arab American University, in that order.
“In support of Al Quds University, Modern University College, and Arab American University, in that order.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in familiarity with ChatGPT between males and females (p = 0.882).
“There was no significant difference in the level of familiarity with ChatGPT between males and females, as indicated by the gender p value of 0.882.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Structured AI education remains scarce among Palestinian nursing students, with 69.9% reporting no formal exposure to AI training.
“However, structured AI education remains scarce, with 69.9% of students reporting no formal exposure to AI training.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
79% of Palestinian nursing students support the inclusion of AI in nursing curricula.
“and 79% supporting its inclusion in nursing curricula.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Fourth-year students scored the highest (M = 29.99) in attitudes toward AI.
“First-year students scored the lowest (M = 27.25), and fourth-year students scored the highest (M = 29.99) in terms of attitudes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
37.2% of Palestinian nursing students felt comfortable utilizing ChatGPT in practice.
“While 37.2% felt comfortable utilizing ChatGPT in practice”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among Palestinian nursing students, there were no statistically significant differences in optimism about patient receptivity to interacting with ChatGPT by gender, age, or living place.
“but not in terms of gender, age, or living place.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference by living place in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.022), with those from villages being more likely to believe this.
“The p value (0.022) indicates a significant difference in living place, with those from villages being more likely to believe that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in ChatGPT knowledge according to age (p = 0.066).
“The age-related p value was 0.066, indicating that there was no significant difference in ChatGPT knowledge according to age.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
82.9% of Palestinian nursing students consider AI crucial for the medical field.
“Overall, students held positive attitudes toward AI, with 82.9% considering it crucial for the medical field”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
62.8% of Palestinian nursing students expressed concerns about accuracy and trust regarding ChatGPT.
“a majority (62.8%) expressed concerns about accuracy and trust.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference by university affiliation in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.010), in favor of Modern University College, Al-Quds University, and Arab American University.
“The p value (0.010) indicates a significant difference in responses based on university affiliation in favor of Modern University College, Al-Quds University and Arab American University.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Palestinian nursing students demonstrate a high level of AI awareness (84.5%).
“This study reveals that Palestinian nursing students demonstrate a high level of AI awareness (84.5%) and acknowledge its significance in medical education.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
51.7% of Palestinian nursing students believe AI could replace healthcare providers.
“Findings indicate that 51.7% of students believe AI could replace healthcare providers”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
First-year students scored the lowest (M = 27.25) in attitudes toward AI.
“First-year students scored the lowest (M = 27.25), and fourth-year students scored the highest (M = 29.99) in terms of attitudes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The 23-27 age group exhibited the lowest levels of AI practice.
“Age did, however, significantly differ in AI practice (p = 0.000), with the 23–27 age group exhibiting the lowest levels of practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Only 41.8% of Palestinian nursing students had received any formal AI instruction.
“Moreover, only 41.8% of students had received any formal AI instruction”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was a statistically significant variation in level of acquaintance with ChatGPT among institutions (p = 0.005).
“A statistically significant variation in the level of acquaintance with ChatGPT among institutions is indicated by the p value of 0.005 for university affiliation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference in attitudes toward AI according to university (p = 0.178).
“There was no significant difference in attitudes according to university (p = 0.178).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Palestinian nursing students expressed concerns about AI's potential for diagnostic errors (62.2%).
“However, Palestinian students expressed concerns about AI's potential for diagnostic errors (62.2%) and its impact on future job security.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A sample of 367 participants was determined to be needed based on 5% margin of error, 95% confidence level, and 50% response distribution.
“After Raosoft was used to determine the appropriate sample size, the researchers reported that a sample of 367 participants would be needed on the basis of a 5% margin of error, 95% confidence level, and 50% response distribution.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Study design and conductown data
A total of 304 individuals responded to the survey.
“A total of 304 individuals, including nursing students from various universities in Palestine, responded to the survey.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Cronbach's alpha for the attitudes section was 0.81.
“Attitudes Section: α = 0.81.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
Disparities in proficiency and access remain key barriers to effective AI integration.
“disparities in proficiency and access remain key barriers to effective AI integration.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Cronbach's alpha for the practice section was 0.76.
“Practice Section: α = 0.76.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
In Palestine, there is a notable gap in the literature regarding the knowledge of health profession students toward AI.
“In Palestine, there is a notable gap in the literature regarding the knowledge of health profession students toward AI [11, 12].”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [11] Barghot M, Abusakran MN, Hamad MH, Sourani AIEL. The Role of Scientific Research in Developing Educational Policies for Higher Education Institutions. An-Najah Univ J Res - B (Humanities). 2024;38(6):1259–88. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [12] Khlouf M. Impact of employing artificial intelligence on media institutions in Palestine from the viewpoint of those in charge of communication. An-Najah Univ J Res - B (Humanities). 2024;38(6):1093–120. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
Cronbach's alpha for the knowledge section was 0.78.
“Knowledge Section: α = 0.78.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Students in AI-integrated healthcare systems, such as those in the United States and Germany, benefit from structured exposure to AI tools, including ChatGPT-based simulations and clinical decision-support systems, which fosters greater confidence in AI applications.
“In contrast, students in AI-integrated healthcare systems, such as those in the United States and Germany, benefit from structured exposure to AI tools, including ChatGPT-based simulations and clinical decision-support systems, which fosters greater confidence in AI applications [10].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [10] Khumrin P, Ryan A, Judd T, Verspoor K. Diagnostic Machine Learning Models for Acute Abdominal Pain: Towards an e-Learning Tool for Medical Students. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2017;245:447–51. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The study's cross-sectional design captures data at a single point in time, which limits the ability to establish causal relationships between AI awareness, attitudes, and actual usage trends.
“The study employed a cross-sectional design, which captures data at a single point in time. While this approach effectively provides a snapshot of students’ perceptions and experiences, it limits the ability to establish causal relationships between AI awareness, attitudes, and actual usage trends.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
AI adoption in medical education remains a challenge in the Middle East, including Palestine.
“Despite this global progress, AI adoption in medical education remains a challenge in the Middle East, including Palestine.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N-N, Khater B. Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: a national survey study. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:1015418. source
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductreasoning
The study's reliance on self-reported data collected through an online questionnaire is prone to social desirability bias and recall bias.
“While self-reporting is an efficient means of gathering large-scale data, it is prone to social desirability bias, where participants may overestimate their AI knowledge or engagement due to perceived expectations.”
- Also stated in: § Limitation of the study · hedged
“Additionally, recall bias may affect responses, particularly regarding past AI training or experiences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Also stated in: § Limitation of the study · hedged
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
- The quote only partly states this claim. 13
- May combine two claims. 31
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown data26% of students selected 'Other' for potential uses of ChatGPT in patient care.
“Other | 79 | 26”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone given16.7% of students disagreed with including AI in nursing and specialized training programs.
“It is possible that worries regarding the viability or applicability of AI in the current training programs accounted for 16.7% of the disagreement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 23% were anxious about incorporating ChatGPT into their practice.
“Only 19.1% of the students were excited, whereas 23% were anxious.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 8 were no experience.
“No Experience (n = 8): Despite hearing about ChatGPT from peers, some had not utilized it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data46% of students cited lack of curriculum as a factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.
“A lack of curriculum (46%) and financial constraints (45%) both had a major impact”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 69.4% had prior AI experience.
“While just 30.6% lacked prior AI experience, a majority (69.4%) did.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationAmong nursing students (n=304), 31.6% used technology several times per week in their academic studies.
“According to academic studies, 35.5% of participants utilized technology daily, and 31.6% used it several times per week.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
FindingcitationAmong nursing students (n=304), 35.5% used technology daily in their academic studies.
“According to academic studies, 35.5% of participants utilized technology daily, and 31.6% used it several times per week.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 33.9% had used ChatGPT in their practice as a nurse.
“Among the nurses practicing, 33.9% had used ChatGPT, and 66.1% had not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 42.1% would be receptive to interacting with ChatGPT.
“While 42.1% would be receptive to interacting with ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNeutral/general responses about ChatGPT in nursing practice included it being helpful for reviewing protocols or looking up diseases and medications, but its applicability sometimes considered limited.
“Neutral/General Responses (n = 8): ChatGPT is thought to be helpful for certain activities, such as reviewing protocols or looking up diseases and medications, but its applicability is sometimes considered to be limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 26.3% cited lack of technological advancement as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.
“According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of technological advancement | Lack of technological advancement | Lack of technological advancement | Lack of technological advancement | 80 | 26.3”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataMixed responses about ChatGPT in nursing practice included finding it easy to use but doubting the accuracy of the information, leading to double-checking or partial trust.
“Mixed Responses (n = 13): Although users found it easy to use, they were dubious about the accuracy of the information, which made them double-check or only partially trust it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 8 were neutral/general responses.
“Neutral/General Responses (n = 8): ChatGPT is thought to be helpful for certain activities, such as reviewing protocols or looking up diseases and medications, but its applicability is sometimes considered to be limited.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 54.3% had constant access to technology.
“Although 10.5% of the people had access to technology only sometimes or never, 54.3% of the people had constant access.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataOf 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 13 were mixed responses.
“Mixed Responses (n = 13): Although users found it easy to use, they were dubious about the accuracy of the information, which made them double-check or only partially trust it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 66.1% had not used ChatGPT in their practice as a nurse.
“Among the nurses practicing, 33.9% had used ChatGPT, and 66.1% had not.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 30.6% lacked prior AI experience.
“While just 30.6% lacked prior AI experience, a majority (69.4%) did.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Findingnone givenNo experience responses about ChatGPT in nursing practice included having heard about it from peers but not used it.
“No Experience (n = 8): Despite hearing about ChatGPT from peers, some had not utilized it.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataMost nursing students (n=304) had intermediate or greater English ability.
“Although a tiny number had limited proficiency, which could limit their use of AI, most people had intermediate or greater English ability, which is essential for interacting with AI technologies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: English proficiency is essential for interacting with AI technologies.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataPositive experiences with ChatGPT in nursing practice included it being useful for learning nursing interventions, presentations, and care plans, but less so for tests and quizzes.
“Good Occurrences (n = 39): ChatGPT is”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown data45% of students cited financial constraints as a factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.
“A lack of curriculum (46%) and financial constraints (45%) both had a major impact”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Findingown dataAmong nursing students (n=304), 10.5% had access to technology only sometimes or never.
“Although 10.5% of the people had access to technology only sometimes or never, 54.3% of the people had constant access.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, gender (p=0.007), age (p=0.006), and university level (p=0.006) significantly impacted how comfortable participants felt in using ChatGPT for patient care, with men, older participants, and fourth-year students feeling more at ease.
“Gender (p = 0.007), age (p = 0.006), and university level (p = 0.006) significantly impacted how comfortable participants felt in using ChatGPT for patient care; men, older participants, and fourth-year students felt more at ease.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference by living place in feeling anxious or neutral about incorporating ChatGPT (p=0.022), with those from villages being more likely to feel anxious or neutral.
“The p value (0.022) was significantly different, with those from villages being more likely to feel anxious or neutral about incorporating ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there were statistically significant differences in ChatGPT usage according to university level (p=0.028), with fourth-year students using it more frequently.
“In practice, there were significant differences in ChatGPT usage according to university level (p = 0.028), with fourth-year students using it more frequently.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there were statistically significant differences at the university level in optimism about patient receptivity to interacting with ChatGPT (p=0.000), with fourth-year students being most optimistic.
“In the case of patient receptivity, the results revealed significant differences at the university level (p = 0.000), with fourth-year students being most optimistic about patient receptivity”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there was a highly statistically significant difference by university level in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.000), with fourth-year students being most likely to believe this.
“The p value (0.000) was highly significantly different, with fourth-year students being most likely to believe that ChatGPT can improve outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, residence and university associations did not significantly differ in comfort using ChatGPT for patient care.
“Residence and university associations did not significantly differ.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference across university levels in excitement about incorporating ChatGPT (p=0.000), with fourth-year students being more excited.
“The p value is 0.000, indicating a significant difference across university levels, with fourth-year students being more excited about incorporating ChatGPT.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there were no statistically significant differences in ChatGPT usage by sex, age, place of residence, or university affiliation.
“There were no significant differences observed in other characteristics, including sex, age, place of residence, and university affiliation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference between males and females in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.042), with males being more likely to believe this.
“The p value was 0.042, indicating a significant difference between males and females, with males being more likely to believe that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataThe questionnaire was reviewed by a panel of five subject-matter experts for relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness.
“The draft questionnaire was reviewed by a panel of five subject-matter experts, including faculty members in medical education, nursing informatics, and AI applications in healthcare. They evaluated the questionnaire for relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataCognitive testing was conducted with a small group of 10 nursing students.
“A small group of 10 nursing students from different academic levels participated in cognitive testing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningAutomated validation rules were used to reduce missing or invalid data.
“The online questionnaire was designed with automated validation rules, including required fields and response constraints (e.g., preventing multiple submissions from the same respondent) to reduce missing or invalid data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMajor challenges to AI adoption in Palestine include insufficient training, the absence of AI-focused curricula, and financial constraints.
“Major challenges to AI adoption in Palestine include insufficient training, the absence of AI-focused curricula, and financial constraints”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataA pilot study with 35 people was conducted to assess the survey's validity and reliability.
“The researchers ran a pilot study with 35 people to assess the survey's validity and reliability”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationLimited institutional support, inadequate training opportunities, and financial constraints have restricted the systematic integration of AI tools into nursing curricula.
“Limited institutional support, inadequate training opportunities, and financial constraints have restricted the systematic integration of AI tools into nursing curricula [9]”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Demaidi MN. Artificial intelligence national strategy in a developing country. AI & SOCIETY. 2023:1–13. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality.
“Participants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality, and informed consent was secured before data collection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenDouble data entry was performed to detect and correct inconsistencies.
“After responses were collected, data entry was performed using the double-entry method to detect and correct inconsistencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataStudents express optimism about AI's potential in healthcare, but concerns about its reliability and integration persist.
“While students’ express optimism about AI’s potential in healthcare, concerns about its reliability and integration persist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn developing regions, including the Middle East, AI integration remains limited due to disparities in infrastructure, institutional readiness, and faculty expertise.
“However, in developing regions, including the Middle East, AI integration remains limited due to disparities in infrastructure, institutional readiness, and faculty expertise [6–8].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites [6] Al Saad MM, Shehadeh A, Alanazi S, Alenezi M, Eid H, Alfaouri MS, Alenezi R. Medical students’ knowledge and attitude towards artificial intelligence: an online survey. Open Public Health J. 2022;15(1). source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [7] Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N-N, Khater B. Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: a national survey study. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:1015418. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [8] Omar A, Shaqour AZ, Khlaif ZN. Attitudes of faculty members in Palestinian universities toward employing artificial intelligence applications in higher education: opportunities and challenges. Front Educ. 2024;9:1414606. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenEthical approval was obtained from the IRB of Modern University College.
“Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Modern University College.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationIn Palestine, the use of AI in nursing education is still in its early stages, with significant barriers hindering its widespread adoption.
“In Palestine, the use of AI in nursing education is still in its early stages, with significant barriers hindering its widespread adoption.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] Demaidi MN. Artificial intelligence national strategy in a developing country. AI & SOCIETY. 2023:1–13. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationAI adoption in healthcare education has progressed rapidly in technologically advanced countries such as the United States, Canada, and Germany.
“AI adoption in healthcare education has progressed rapidly in technologically advanced countries such as the United States, Canada, and Germany, where institutions have incorporated AI-driven simulations, virtual standardized patients, and clinical decision-support systems into curricula [4].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [4] Randhawa GK, Jackson M. The role of artificial intelligence in learning and professional development for healthcare professionals. Healthc Manage Forum. 2020;33(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419869032. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDespite growing awareness, there is a lack of formal education on AI among Palestinian nursing students.
“It reveals that, despite growing awareness, the lack of formal education on AI underscores the need for comprehensive curricula.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAI can improve medical practice, address staff shortages, and enhance diagnostic efficiency.
“Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming multiple industries, including healthcare and medical education, by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, supporting clinical decision-making, and addressing workforce shortages [1, 2].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Study design and conductnone givenConvenience sampling has drawbacks, including sampling bias, which can compromise data accuracy, and the sample is not representative of the population being studied.
“Convenience sampling has drawbacks, including sampling bias, which can compromise data accuracy. The sample is not representative of the population being studied”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationIn countries with well-established AI infrastructure, such as the United States, Canada, and parts of Europe, AI-driven education is increasingly prevalent.
“In countries with well-established AI infrastructure, such as the United States, Canada, and parts of Europe, AI-driven education is increasingly prevalent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Barghot M, Abusakran MN, Hamad MH, Sourani AIEL. The Role of Scientific Research in Developing Educational Policies for Higher Education Institutions. An-Najah Univ J Res - B (Humanities). 2024;38(6):1259–88. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study does not extensively explore institutional policies, administrative support, or infrastructural challenges that influence AI adoption in Palestinian universities.
“However, this study does not extensively explore the institutional policies, administrative support, or infrastructural challenges that influence AI adoption in Palestinian universities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCountries that invest in AI-driven medical education report higher student engagement, improved diagnostic capabilities, and shifts in career perspectives as AI competencies become increasingly essential in modern healthcare roles.
“In comparison, countries that invest in AI-driven medical education report higher student engagement, improved diagnostic capabilities, and shifts in career perspectives as AI competencies become increasingly essential in modern healthcare roles [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Khlaif ZN, Alkouk WA, Salama N, Abu EB. Redesigning Assessments for AI-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative AI Era. Educ Sci. 2025;15(2):174. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataOptimism about AI's potential to improve healthcare is predominant among Palestinian nursing students, although concerns about reliability and integration persist.
“Optimism about AI's potential to improve healthcare is predominant, although concerns about reliability and integration persist.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenThe study does not extensively analyze how AI tools are currently integrated into clinical practice or their direct impact on patient care.
“Lastly, while the study assesses students' familiarity with AI and ChatGPT, it does not extensively analyze how AI tools are currently integrated into clinical practice or their direct impact on patient care.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataBarriers to AI adoption include inadequate training, lack of curriculum, and financial constraints.
“Barriers to AI adoption include inadequate training, lack of curriculum, and financial constraints, highlighting the need for structural reforms to fully integrate AI into healthcare education and practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataChatGPT, while familiar for its potential in patient care, faces mixed responses regarding its use, with some students uncertain about its effectiveness.
“ChatGPT, while familiar for its potential in patient care, faces mixed responses regarding its use, with some students uncertain about its effectiveness.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMedical students in South Korea and Germany report that AI enhances diagnostic efficiency, reduces physician workload, and improves patient outcomes without diminishing the human role in healthcare.
“For example, medical students in South Korea and Germany report that AI enhances diagnostic efficiency, reduces physician workload, and improves patient outcomes without diminishing the human role in healthcare [16].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [16] Khlaif ZN, Alkouk WA, Salama N, Abu EB. Redesigning Assessments for AI-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative AI Era. Educ Sci. 2025;15(2):174. source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataIn practice, many Palestinian nursing students have not yet fully integrated AI tools like ChatGPT into their clinical routines, with some expressing hesitance due to accuracy concerns.
“In practice, many students have not yet fully integrated AI tools like ChatGPT into their clinical routines, with some expressing hesitance due to accuracy concerns.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataThe absence of AI-focused curricula in Palestinian universities mirrors findings from other Middle Eastern institutions, where students express strong optimism about AI but struggle with its practical implementation.
“The absence of AI-focused curricula in Palestinian universities mirrors findings from other Middle Eastern institutions, where students express strong optimism about AI (79%) but struggle with its practical implementation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study underscores the limited integration of AI within nursing curricula, making it difficult to assess the direct impact of structured AI training on students' competencies.
“The study also underscores the limited integration of AI within nursing curricula, making it difficult to assess the direct impact of structured AI training on students' competencies.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe study's convenience sampling technique introduces selection bias and limits the generalizability of the findings.
“Additionally, the study utilized a convenience sampling technique, which, while practical, introduces selection bias and limits the generalizability of the findings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationMany universities in the Middle East face limitations in AI-focused curricula, insufficient training opportunities, and infrastructural barriers that hinder large-scale implementation.
“Unlike Western counterparts, many universities in the region face limitations in AI-focused curricula, insufficient training opportunities, and infrastructural barriers that hinder large-scale implementation [7].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [7] Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N-N, Khater B. Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: a national survey study. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:1015418. source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationChatGPT has the potential to streamline administrative tasks, provide real-time support in patient management, and foster critical thinking.
“as ChatGPT has the potential to streamline administrative tasks, provide real-time support in patient management, and foster critical thinking, as outlined by [13, 21].”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites [13] Ahmed Z, Bhinder KK, Tariq A, Tahir MJ, Mehmood Q, Tabassum MS, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Pakistan: A cross-sectional online survey. Ann Med Surg. 2022;76:103493. source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites [21] Awadallah Alkouk W, Khlaif ZN. AI-resistant assessments in higher education: practical insights from faculty training workshops. Front Educ. 2024;9:1499495. source
Not checked in the free run.
The paper relies on this without support.
There is little research assessing how nursing students perceive and engage with AI technologies.
“While some Palestinian universities have begun exploring AI applications in medical education, there is little research assessing how nursing students perceive and engage with these technologies.”
The paper relies on this without support.
English proficiency is essential for interacting with AI technologies.
“which is essential for interacting with AI technologies”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Knowledge-Attitude-Practice model suggests that knowledge serves as the precursor to attitude formation, and attitudes, in turn, drive behavioral practice.
“The model suggests that knowledge serves as the precursor to attitude formation, and attitudes, in turn, drive behavioral practice (Andrade et al., 2020; Salama et al., 2025).”
From A two-step structural equation modeling and explainable machine learning framework for understanding university students’ adoption of generative AI: balancing intrinsic motivations and perceived risks (2026) · cites this paper as Salama et al., 2025
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Fourth-year practice score is interpreted in the wrong direction
MajorFourth-year students have the lowest practice mean among university levels in Table 10. Given the stated coding of 1 for yes and 2 for no, that does not support describing them as having the least practice.
“There was a significant difference between university levels (p = 0.000), with fourth-year students exhibiting the least amount of practice (M = 4.25).”
“The practice questionnaire was notable for having a scale with 1 denoting yes and 2 denoting no.”
University-level comfort p-value differs from Table 13
MinorThe text gives p = 0.006 for university-level differences in comfort using ChatGPT for patient care, while Table 13 reports 0.000 for that comparison.
“Gender (p = 0.007), age (p = 0.006), and university level (p = 0.006) significantly impacted how comfortable participants felt in using ChatGPT for patient care;”
“| University level | Fourth | 49 | 77 | | 0.028 | 62 | 64 | | 0.000 |”
Female share differs from Table 1
MinorThe results say 78% of participants were female, but Table 1 reports 215 of 304, or 70.7%.
“Seventy-eight percent of the participants were females.”
“| Gender | Female | 215 | 70.7 |”
Cites
Medical students' attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey
Pinto dos Santos, D., Giese, D., Brodehl, S., Chon, S. H., Staab, W., Kleinert, R., Maintz, D., & Baeßler, B. (2019) · European Radiology · doi:10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1 · Cited by 754 · see citing works
Machine learning and medical education
Kolachalama, V. B., & Garg, P. S. (2018) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-018-0061-1 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Ahmed, Z., Bhinder, K. K., Tariq, A., Tahir, M. J., Mehmood, Q., Tabassum, M. S., Malik, M., Aslam, S., Asghar, M. S., & Yousaf, Z. (2022) · Annals of Medicine & Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103493 · Cited by 208 · see citing works
Labrague, L. J., Aguilar-Rosales, R., Yboa, B. C., Sabio, J. B., & de los Santos, J. A. (2023) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2023.103815 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
Redesigning assessments for AI-enhanced learning: a framework for educators in the generative AI era
Khlaif, Z. N., Alkouk, W. A., Salama, N., & Abu Eideh, B. (2025) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci15020174 · Cited by 127 · see citing works
Self-citationPark, S. H., Choi, J., & Byeon, J. (2021) · Korean Journal of Radiology · doi:10.3348/kjr.2021.0048 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Exploring the future of nursing: Insights from the ChatGPT model
Gunawan, J. (2023) · Belitung Nursing Journal · doi:10.33546/bnj.2551 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Students’ attitudes towards using ChatGPT as a learning tool: the case of the University of Jordan.
O. Ajlouni, A., Abd-Alkareem Wahba, F., & Salem Almahaireh, A. (2023) · International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM) · doi:10.3991/ijim.v17i18.41753 · Cited by 116 · see citing works
Randhawa, G. K., & Jackson, M. (2020) · Healthcare Management Forum · doi:10.1177/0840470419869032 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Irwin, P., Jones, D., & Fealy, S. (2023) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105835 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Doumat, G., Daher, D., Ghanem, N.-N., & Khater, B. (2022) · Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.3389/frai.2022.1015418 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Abujaber, A. A., Abd-alrazaq, A., Al-Qudimat, A. R., & Nashwan, A. J. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.48643 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence national strategy in a developing country
Demaidi, M. N. (2025) · AI & SOCIETY · doi:10.1007/s00146-023-01779-x · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Maicher, K. R., Zimmerman, L., Wilcox, B., Liston, B., Cronau, H., Macerollo, A., Jin, L., Jaffe, E., White, M., Fosler-Lussier, E., et al. (2019) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2019.1616683 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
AI-resistant assessments in higher education: Practical insights from faculty training workshops
Awadallah Alkouk, W., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1499495 · Cited by 68 · see citing works
Self-citationMedical Students’ Knowledge and Attitude Towards Artificial Intelligence: An Online Survey
Al Saad, M. M., Shehadeh, A., Alanazi, S., Alenezi, M., Abu alez, A., Eid, H., Alfaouri, M. S., Aldawsari, S., & Alenezi, R. (2022) · The Open Public Health Journal · doi:10.2174/18749445-v15-e2203290 · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Artificial intelligence and its potential in oncology
Londhe, V. Y., & Bhasin, B. (2019) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2018.10.005 · Cited by 53 · see citing works
Piyapong, K., Anna, R., Terry, J., & Karin, V. (2017) · Studies in Health Technology and Informatics · doi:10.3233/978-1-61499-830-3-447 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Omar, A., Shaqour, A. Z., & Khlaif, Z. N. (2024) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2024.1414606 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationKhlouf, M. (2024) · An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) · doi:10.35552/0247.38.6.2214 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
The Role of Scientific Research in Developing Educational Policies for Higher Education Institutions
Barghot, M., Abusakran, M. N., Hamad, M. H., & Sourani, A. I. E. (2024) · An-Najah University Journal for Research - B (Humanities) · doi:10.35552/0247.38.6.2219 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
El Arab, R. A., Alshakihs, A. H., Alabdulwahab, S. H., Almubarak, Y. S., Alkhalifah, S. S., Abdrbo, A., Hassanein, S., & Sagbakken, M. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1666005 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Abdelwanis, M., Simsekler, M. C. E., Gabor, A. F., Sleptchenko, A., & Omar, M. (2025) · Safety Science · doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2025.107028 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
El-Banna, M. M., Sajid, M. R., Rizvi, M. R., Sami, W., & McNelis, A. M. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1681784 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Advancing higher education with GenAI: factors influencing educator AI literacy
Ayyoub, A. M., Khlaif, Z. N., Shamali, M., Abu Eideh, B., Assali, A., Hattab, M. K., Barham, K. A., & Bsharat, T. R. K. (2025) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2025.1530721 · Cited by 44 · see citing works
Self-citationAlqaissi, N. M., & Qtait, M. T. (2025) · SAGE Open Nursing · doi:10.1177/23779608251374185 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Yuan, Y., Fu, J., Leng, L., Wen, Z., Wei, X., Han, D., Hu, X., Liang, Y., Luo, Q., Zhang, X., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1672140 · Cited by 25 · see citing works
Zhao, Y., Yuan, Y., Wen, Z., Leng, L., Shi, L., Hu, X., Xiaoman, W., Zuo, M., Mou, J., Luo, Q., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Public Health · doi:10.3389/fpubh.2025.1648416 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
El‐Ashry, A. M., AlSaleh, N. S., AlOtaibi, N. G., Al-Mutairi, T. A., Sallam, L. A., Alnassar, M. M., Alshehri, K. A., Al-Ghareeb, S. A., Alotaibi, R., Almutairi, W., et al. (2025) · SAGE Open Nursing · doi:10.1177/23779608251369564 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Olawade, D. B., David-Olawade, A. C., Rotifa, O. B., & Wada, O. Z. (2025) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2025.104511 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Research on artificial intelligence literacy among nursing professionals: a scoping review
Wang, Q., Lu, N., Yu, C., Qi, J., Zhang, H., & Shi, H. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04448-8 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Rapid review on GenAI in nursing education
Hinsche, L., Hasseler, M., Tischendorf, T., & Schaal, T. K. (2026) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2025.1725425 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Zeng, Q., Zhu, J., Qin, Y., Su, S., & Huang, X. (2025) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106899 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
El‐Ashry, A. M., Hermis, A. H., AL-Salih, S. S. H., Al-Jabri, M. M., Karim, N. A. H. A., Mohamed, H. A. A., Alkubati, S. A., AlOtaibi, N. G., Wahab, M. J., Hassan, A. A.-H., et al. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107011 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Zeng, D., Xu, X., Zhu, T., Li, Y., & Li, Q. (2026) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1743722 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Al-Atraqchi, O. M. A., Abdulmuhsin, A. A., Rehman, S. U., & Mjlae, S. (2026) · VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems · doi:10.1108/vjikms-08-2024-0309 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Alrazeeni, D. M., Alharrasi, M., Rony, M. K. K., Halder, C. R., Dhola, F.-T.-J., Aktery, A., & Tama, I. J. (2026) · Discover Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12982-026-01928-9 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Abuejheisheh, A. J., Haddad, R. H., Alafaghani, S., Thawabteh, A., Khanafseh, M., Sheebat, B., Horaini, L., Hawareen, B., Abughannam, Y., Dugan, C., et al. (2025) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076251393284 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Zaid, E., Qaddumi, J. A. S., Sabbagh, H., & Esleem, F. (2026) · BMC Nursing · doi:10.1186/s12912-026-04666-0 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Majidpanah, K., Afra, A., & Tahery, N. (2025) · Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Sciences · doi:10.5812/jnms-165629 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Dzikowicz, D. J., DiPaulo, N., Serwetnyk, T. M., Marconi, M., & Carey, M. G. (2026) · Nurse Educator · doi:10.1097/nne.0000000000002178 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Zeng, Q., Zhu, J., Hu, J., Su, S., Yang, M., Luo, B., & Huang, Y. (2026) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2026.107177 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Wang, Y., Peng, Z., & Hou, J. (2025) · Acta Psychologica · doi:10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.105665 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Arroyo-Bello, E., González-Toledo, B., Abad-Valle, J., Rodríguez-Gómez, P., & Ramon, M. (2025) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.94259 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
ChatGPT at University: The Definitive Transition from Adoption to Quality of Student Interaction
Deroncele-Acosta, Á., Sánchez-Trujillo, M. D. L. Á., Palacios-Núñez, M. L., Ben, P. N. D., Atúncar-Prieto, C. A., & Soria-Valencia, E. (2026) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci16040515 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Ahmed, Z. A., Kaladi, I. A., Rehan, J., Hussain, Z., Zardari, J. A., & Kumar, A. (2025) · NURSEARCHER (Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Sciences) · doi:10.54393/nrs.v5i2.175
Artificial Intelligence Among Palestinian Nursing Students: Attitude and Awareness
Aqqad, S. A. (2025) · 2025 International Conference on Smart Learning Courses (SCME) · doi:10.1109/scme62582.2025.11104875
Wang, Y., Wang, X., Zhu, L., Tan, M., Tao, M., & Ma, S. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-8463670/v1
Vásquez-Peñafiel, M.-S., Sosa, P. A., Vizcaíno-Imacaña, P., Verdezoto-Camacho, J. E., & Jaramillo-Cerda, M. (2025) · International Conference on Education Technology and Computer · doi:10.1109/icetc66579.2025.11387402
Ahmed, A. K., Chandio, I. A., Khan, I. M., Kumar, P. R., Bahadur, R., & Malhi, S. D. (2026) · NURSEARCHER (Journal of Nursing & Midwifery Sciences) · doi:10.54393/nrs.v6i1.225
Garba, A. M., Mudenda, S., & Okoro, R. N. (2026) · Science and Technology Nexus · doi:10.25259/stn_5_2026
Alanezi, F. Z., Alenazi, L., Alkathiri, A. M., & Innab, A. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-09721-7
Teaching Critical Appraisal in the Age of Generative Artificial Intelligence
Zakhari, R. (2026) · CIN Computers Informatics Nursing · doi:10.1097/cin.0000000000001603
Majeed, H. M., Al‐Ganmi, A. H. A., Abdulyemmah, A. D., Mohammed, T. R., Hassan, A. F., Al-Waeli, H. R., & Alsolais, A. (2026) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.184799.1
Kundu, P. K., Roy, S., & Ahmed, M. T. (2026) · Journal of Educational Technology Systems · doi:10.1177/00472395261470189
Na, K., & Jeong, Y. (2026) · The Journal of Academic Librarianship · doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2026.103328
Sarıtaş, E., & Öztürk, P. Ç. (2026) · Sakarya Üniversitesi Holistik Sağlık Dergisi · doi:10.54803/sauhsd.1924219
Asmar, F. (2026) · Discover Education · doi:10.1007/s44217-026-02195-1
Hassan, J., Al-Kharusi, H., Al-Farsi, H., Al-Kharusi, R., Al-Tamtami, Z., Al-Tubi, I., Al-Ruqieshi, A., Al-Balushi, S., & Azri, Z. A. (2026) · Nursing Forum · doi:10.1155/nuf/4700220
Wang, C., Yang, L., Cai, X., Wu, Y., Lin, Y., huang, F., & Geng, C. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.112293
Nasser, A. A., Alasiri, A., Zagzoog, G., Bokhari, R., Alharbi, R., & Mansury, N. (2026) · MedEdPublish · doi:10.12688/mep.21828.1
Sandamali, E., & Samarathunga, W. H. M. S. (2026) · Creative Nursing · doi:10.1177/10784535261497719
- Authors
- Salama, N., Bsharat, R., Alwawi, A., & Khlaif, Z. N.
- Affiliations
- Arab American University (PS)
- Al-Quds University (PS)
- An-Najah National University (PS)
- Corresponding author
- Salama, Nisreen
- Venue
- BMC Nursing
- Published
- 2025-03-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 269-269
- ISSN
- 1472-6955 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11895262
- OpenAlex
- W4408338915
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 21
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 17
- FWCI
- 9.89
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- BMC Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
- Keywords
- ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in nursing education, nursing students, knowledge, attitudes and practices, AI adoption barriers, Palestinian universities, West Bank, financial constraints
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review