Cited by 42Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

Knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward AI technology (ChatGPT) among nursing students at Palestinian universities

Open access
Salama, Nisreen, Bsharat, Rebhi, Alwawi, Abdallah, Khlaif, Zuheir N.·2025·BMC Nursing

Abstract

BACKGROUND: AI can improve medical practice, address staff shortages, and enhance diagnostic efficiency. The ChatGPT of Open AI, launched in 2022, uses AI in medical education. However, the long-term impact is uncertain, and integration varies globally, particularly in the Middle East. AIM: To explore the knowledge, practices, and attitudes of nursing students in Palestinian universities regarding AI, specifically the use of ChatGPT. METHODOLOGY: A cross-sectional design was used to conduct this study. The study was performed at 8 private and governmental universities in the West Bank, Palestine, from 1st May 2024 to 30 May 2024, and 304 nursing students participated. RESULTS: The study revealed that 84.5% of nursing students at Palestinian universities were aware of AI technology, yet 69.9% lacked formal education or training related to ChatGPT. Despite this gap, 79% supported the integration of AI into nursing curricula and specialized training programs, reflecting strong optimism about its role in education and healthcare. While 58.6% had used AI in their coursework and 68.1% felt comfortable with technology, disparities in proficiency and access remain key barriers to effective AI integration. Major challenges to AI adoption in Palestine include insufficient training, the absence of AI-focused curricula, and financial constraints, underscoring the need for institutional and pedagogical reforms. Concerns about AI's reliability, costs, and potential diagnostic errors persist, emphasizing the complexities of its integration into nursing education and practice. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Palestinian nursing students regarding AI and ChatGPT. It reveals that, despite growing awareness, the lack of formal education on AI underscores the need for comprehensive curricula. While students' express optimism about AI's potential in healthcare, concerns about its reliability and integration persist. The study also reveals that barriers such as inadequate training, limited curricula, and financial constraints must be addressed to effectively integrate AI into nursing education and prepare students for its expanding role in healthcare.

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a cross-sectional survey of 304 nursing students at eight Palestinian universities, AI awareness was high (84.5%) and support for AI curricula strong (79%), but formal ChatGPT training was low (69.4% none) and clinical use limited (33.9% used ChatGPT in nursing practice). Students were optimistic about AI’s healthcare role yet concerned about reliability and diagnostic errors (62.2% believed AI could increase diagnostic errors), with training, curriculum, and financial barriers cited.

Key findings

  • Knowledge: 84.5% knew what AI was, 52.6% were aware of machine learning/deep learning, 53.3% knew of medical AI applications, and 41.8% had been taught AI in college; for ChatGPT, 27.6% were very familiar, 49.0% somewhat familiar, 23.4% not at all familiar, and 69.4% had no training/education related to ChatGPT.
  • Attitudes: 82.9% believed AI is essential in the medical field, 79% supported including AI in nursing curricula/specialist training, and 75.4% thought AI introduction is necessary in hospitals/health centers; however, 62.2% believed AI could increase diagnostic errors and 51.7% believed AI will replace healthcare providers. For ChatGPT, 50.7% doubted it can improve patient outcomes, 57.9% thought patients would not be receptive, 47.7% were neutral about incorporating it into practice, 23.0% were anxious, and 19.1% were excited.
  • Practices: 58.6% had used AI, 54.3% found AI easy to apply, and 68.1% were comfortable/very comfortable with technology; 33.9% had used ChatGPT in nursing practice, 37.2% felt comfortable using ChatGPT in patient care, and 62.8% did not.
  • Barriers and subgroup differences: reduced AI practice in Palestine was attributed to lack of proper training (56.2%), lack of interest (52.6%), lack of awareness (52.3%), lack of curriculum (46%), financial constraints (45%), and lack of technological advancement (26.3%); attitudes differed by university level (p = 0.022; first-year M = 27.25 vs fourth-year M = 29.99), and AI practice differed by age (p = 0.000) and university level (p = 0.000; fourth-year lowest M = 4.25).

Methods

  • Cross-sectional design conducted at 8 private and governmental universities in the West Bank, Palestine, from 1 May 2024 to 30 May 2024; 304 nursing students participated via convenience sampling, though Raosoft estimated 367 participants were needed for a 5% margin of error, 95% confidence level, and 50% response distribution.
  • Data were collected through an online, self-administered Google Forms questionnaire covering demographics, AI/ChatGPT knowledge, attitudes, and practices; a pilot study with 35 students assessed validity/reliability, with Cronbach’s alpha of 0.78 for knowledge, 0.81 for attitudes, and 0.76 for practice.
  • Analysis used SPSS Version 27 with descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, means, SDs) and inferential statistics (independent t tests, one-way ANOVA), with significance set at p < 0.05.

Limitations

  • Stated: the cross-sectional design captures a single time point and cannot establish causal relationships; convenience sampling introduces selection bias and limits generalizability; self-reported online data are prone to social desirability and recall bias.
  • Stated: limited AI integration in nursing curricula makes it difficult to assess the direct impact of structured AI training; institutional policies, administrative support, and infrastructural challenges are not extensively explored; the study does not extensively analyze how AI tools are integrated into clinical practice or their direct impact on patient care.
  • Evident from the text: the final sample of 304 fell short of the Raosoft target of 367; the abstract reports 69.9% lacked formal ChatGPT education while Table 3 reports 69.4%, a minor numerical discrepancy.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12912-025-02913-4

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 18 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    52.6% of students cited lack of interest as a main factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.

    “A lack of appropriate training (56.2%) and a lack of interest (52.6%) were the main factors contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    48.3% of students agreed that AI would be a burden.

    “With respect to whether AI would be a burden, the students were largely divided, with 48.3% agreeing”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    24.3% of students recognized providing medication reminders as a potential use of ChatGPT in patient care.

    “Providing medication reminders | 74 | 24.3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    30.6% of students had received training or education related to ChatGPT.

    “Yes | 93 | 30.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Findingown data

    27.6% of students were very familiar with ChatGPT.

    “Very familiar | 84 | 27.6”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 29
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 13
  • May combine two claims. 31
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    26% of students selected 'Other' for potential uses of ChatGPT in patient care.

    “Other | 79 | 26”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingnone given

    16.7% of students disagreed with including AI in nursing and specialized training programs.

    “It is possible that worries regarding the viability or applicability of AI in the current training programs accounted for 16.7% of the disagreement.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 23% were anxious about incorporating ChatGPT into their practice.

    “Only 19.1% of the students were excited, whereas 23% were anxious.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Of 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 8 were no experience.

    “No Experience (n = 8): Despite hearing about ChatGPT from peers, some had not utilized it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    46% of students cited lack of curriculum as a factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.

    “A lack of curriculum (46%) and financial constraints (45%) both had a major impact”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 69.4% had prior AI experience.

    “While just 30.6% lacked prior AI experience, a majority (69.4%) did.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    Among nursing students (n=304), 31.6% used technology several times per week in their academic studies.

    “According to academic studies, 35.5% of participants utilized technology daily, and 31.6% used it several times per week.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingcitation

    Among nursing students (n=304), 35.5% used technology daily in their academic studies.

    “According to academic studies, 35.5% of participants utilized technology daily, and 31.6% used it several times per week.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 33.9% had used ChatGPT in their practice as a nurse.

    “Among the nurses practicing, 33.9% had used ChatGPT, and 66.1% had not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 42.1% would be receptive to interacting with ChatGPT.

    “While 42.1% would be receptive to interacting with ChatGPT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Neutral/general responses about ChatGPT in nursing practice included it being helpful for reviewing protocols or looking up diseases and medications, but its applicability sometimes considered limited.

    “Neutral/General Responses (n = 8): ChatGPT is thought to be helpful for certain activities, such as reviewing protocols or looking up diseases and medications, but its applicability is sometimes considered to be limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 26.3% cited lack of technological advancement as a reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine.

    “According to you what might be the reason for reduced practice of AI in Palestine? | Lack of technological advancement | Lack of technological advancement | Lack of technological advancement | Lack of technological advancement | 80 | 26.3”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Mixed responses about ChatGPT in nursing practice included finding it easy to use but doubting the accuracy of the information, leading to double-checking or partial trust.

    “Mixed Responses (n = 13): Although users found it easy to use, they were dubious about the accuracy of the information, which made them double-check or only partially trust it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Of 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 8 were neutral/general responses.

    “Neutral/General Responses (n = 8): ChatGPT is thought to be helpful for certain activities, such as reviewing protocols or looking up diseases and medications, but its applicability is sometimes considered to be limited.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 54.3% had constant access to technology.

    “Although 10.5% of the people had access to technology only sometimes or never, 54.3% of the people had constant access.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Of 75 classified responses about ChatGPT use in nursing practice, 13 were mixed responses.

    “Mixed Responses (n = 13): Although users found it easy to use, they were dubious about the accuracy of the information, which made them double-check or only partially trust it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 66.1% had not used ChatGPT in their practice as a nurse.

    “Among the nurses practicing, 33.9% had used ChatGPT, and 66.1% had not.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 30.6% lacked prior AI experience.

    “While just 30.6% lacked prior AI experience, a majority (69.4%) did.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).

    Findingnone given

    No experience responses about ChatGPT in nursing practice included having heard about it from peers but not used it.

    “No Experience (n = 8): Despite hearing about ChatGPT from peers, some had not utilized it.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    Most nursing students (n=304) had intermediate or greater English ability.

    “Although a tiny number had limited proficiency, which could limit their use of AI, most people had intermediate or greater English ability, which is essential for interacting with AI technologies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: English proficiency is essential for interacting with AI technologies.
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Positive experiences with ChatGPT in nursing practice included it being useful for learning nursing interventions, presentations, and care plans, but less so for tests and quizzes.

    “Good Occurrences (n = 39): ChatGPT is”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Findingown data

    45% of students cited financial constraints as a factor contributing to the decrease in AI practices in Palestine.

    “A lack of curriculum (46%) and financial constraints (45%) both had a major impact”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Findingown data

    Among nursing students (n=304), 10.5% had access to technology only sometimes or never.

    “Although 10.5% of the people had access to technology only sometimes or never, 54.3% of the people had constant access.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, gender (p=0.007), age (p=0.006), and university level (p=0.006) significantly impacted how comfortable participants felt in using ChatGPT for patient care, with men, older participants, and fourth-year students feeling more at ease.

    “Gender (p = 0.007), age (p = 0.006), and university level (p = 0.006) significantly impacted how comfortable participants felt in using ChatGPT for patient care; men, older participants, and fourth-year students felt more at ease.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference by living place in feeling anxious or neutral about incorporating ChatGPT (p=0.022), with those from villages being more likely to feel anxious or neutral.

    “The p value (0.022) was significantly different, with those from villages being more likely to feel anxious or neutral about incorporating ChatGPT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there were statistically significant differences in ChatGPT usage according to university level (p=0.028), with fourth-year students using it more frequently.

    “In practice, there were significant differences in ChatGPT usage according to university level (p = 0.028), with fourth-year students using it more frequently.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there were statistically significant differences at the university level in optimism about patient receptivity to interacting with ChatGPT (p=0.000), with fourth-year students being most optimistic.

    “In the case of patient receptivity, the results revealed significant differences at the university level (p = 0.000), with fourth-year students being most optimistic about patient receptivity”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a highly statistically significant difference by university level in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.000), with fourth-year students being most likely to believe this.

    “The p value (0.000) was highly significantly different, with fourth-year students being most likely to believe that ChatGPT can improve outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, residence and university associations did not significantly differ in comfort using ChatGPT for patient care.

    “Residence and university associations did not significantly differ.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference across university levels in excitement about incorporating ChatGPT (p=0.000), with fourth-year students being more excited.

    “The p value is 0.000, indicating a significant difference across university levels, with fourth-year students being more excited about incorporating ChatGPT.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there were no statistically significant differences in ChatGPT usage by sex, age, place of residence, or university affiliation.

    “There were no significant differences observed in other characteristics, including sex, age, place of residence, and university affiliation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among Palestinian nursing students, there was a statistically significant difference between males and females in believing that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes (p=0.042), with males being more likely to believe this.

    “The p value was 0.042, indicating a significant difference between males and females, with males being more likely to believe that ChatGPT can improve patient outcomes.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    The questionnaire was reviewed by a panel of five subject-matter experts for relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness.

    “The draft questionnaire was reviewed by a panel of five subject-matter experts, including faculty members in medical education, nursing informatics, and AI applications in healthcare. They evaluated the questionnaire for relevance, clarity, and comprehensiveness.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Cognitive testing was conducted with a small group of 10 nursing students.

    “A small group of 10 nursing students from different academic levels participated in cognitive testing.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductreasoning

    Automated validation rules were used to reduce missing or invalid data.

    “The online questionnaire was designed with automated validation rules, including required fields and response constraints (e.g., preventing multiple submissions from the same respondent) to reduce missing or invalid data.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Major challenges to AI adoption in Palestine include insufficient training, the absence of AI-focused curricula, and financial constraints.

    “Major challenges to AI adoption in Palestine include insufficient training, the absence of AI-focused curricula, and financial constraints”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    A pilot study with 35 people was conducted to assess the survey's validity and reliability.

    “The researchers ran a pilot study with 35 people to assess the survey's validity and reliability”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Limited institutional support, inadequate training opportunities, and financial constraints have restricted the systematic integration of AI tools into nursing curricula.

    “Limited institutional support, inadequate training opportunities, and financial constraints have restricted the systematic integration of AI tools into nursing curricula [9]”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Demaidi MN. Artificial intelligence national strategy in a developing country. AI & SOCIETY. 2023:1–13. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductown data

    Participants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality.

    “Participants were assured of anonymity and confidentiality, and informed consent was secured before data collection.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Double data entry was performed to detect and correct inconsistencies.

    “After responses were collected, data entry was performed using the double-entry method to detect and correct inconsistencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Students express optimism about AI's potential in healthcare, but concerns about its reliability and integration persist.

    “While students’ express optimism about AI’s potential in healthcare, concerns about its reliability and integration persist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In developing regions, including the Middle East, AI integration remains limited due to disparities in infrastructure, institutional readiness, and faculty expertise.

    “However, in developing regions, including the Middle East, AI integration remains limited due to disparities in infrastructure, institutional readiness, and faculty expertise [6–8].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites [6] Al Saad MM, Shehadeh A, Alanazi S, Alenezi M, Eid H, Alfaouri MS, Alenezi R. Medical students’ knowledge and attitude towards artificial intelligence: an online survey. Open Public Health J. 2022;15(1). source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [7] Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N-N, Khater B. Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: a national survey study. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:1015418. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Omar A, Shaqour AZ, Khlaif ZN. Attitudes of faculty members in Palestinian universities toward employing artificial intelligence applications in higher education: opportunities and challenges. Front Educ. 2024;9:1414606. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    Ethical approval was obtained from the IRB of Modern University College.

    “Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Modern University College.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    In Palestine, the use of AI in nursing education is still in its early stages, with significant barriers hindering its widespread adoption.

    “In Palestine, the use of AI in nursing education is still in its early stages, with significant barriers hindering its widespread adoption.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [9] Demaidi MN. Artificial intelligence national strategy in a developing country. AI & SOCIETY. 2023:1–13. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    AI adoption in healthcare education has progressed rapidly in technologically advanced countries such as the United States, Canada, and Germany.

    “AI adoption in healthcare education has progressed rapidly in technologically advanced countries such as the United States, Canada, and Germany, where institutions have incorporated AI-driven simulations, virtual standardized patients, and clinical decision-support systems into curricula [4].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Randhawa GK, Jackson M. The role of artificial intelligence in learning and professional development for healthcare professionals. Healthc Manage Forum. 2020;33(1):19–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0840470419869032. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Despite growing awareness, there is a lack of formal education on AI among Palestinian nursing students.

    “It reveals that, despite growing awareness, the lack of formal education on AI underscores the need for comprehensive curricula.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    AI can improve medical practice, address staff shortages, and enhance diagnostic efficiency.

    “Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming multiple industries, including healthcare and medical education, by enhancing diagnostic accuracy, supporting clinical decision-making, and addressing workforce shortages [1, 2].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [1] Kolachalama VB, Garg PS. Machine learning and medical education. NPJ Digit Med. 2018;1(1):54. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [2] Londhe VY, Bhasin B. Artificial intelligence and its potential in oncology. Drug Discov Today. 2019;24(1):228–32. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductnone given

    Convenience sampling has drawbacks, including sampling bias, which can compromise data accuracy, and the sample is not representative of the population being studied.

    “Convenience sampling has drawbacks, including sampling bias, which can compromise data accuracy. The sample is not representative of the population being studied”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    In countries with well-established AI infrastructure, such as the United States, Canada, and parts of Europe, AI-driven education is increasingly prevalent.

    “In countries with well-established AI infrastructure, such as the United States, Canada, and parts of Europe, AI-driven education is increasingly prevalent.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [11] Barghot M, Abusakran MN, Hamad MH, Sourani AIEL. The Role of Scientific Research in Developing Educational Policies for Higher Education Institutions. An-Najah Univ J Res - B (Humanities). 2024;38(6):1259–88. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study does not extensively explore institutional policies, administrative support, or infrastructural challenges that influence AI adoption in Palestinian universities.

    “However, this study does not extensively explore the institutional policies, administrative support, or infrastructural challenges that influence AI adoption in Palestinian universities.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Countries that invest in AI-driven medical education report higher student engagement, improved diagnostic capabilities, and shifts in career perspectives as AI competencies become increasingly essential in modern healthcare roles.

    “In comparison, countries that invest in AI-driven medical education report higher student engagement, improved diagnostic capabilities, and shifts in career perspectives as AI competencies become increasingly essential in modern healthcare roles [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Khlaif ZN, Alkouk WA, Salama N, Abu EB. Redesigning Assessments for AI-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative AI Era. Educ Sci. 2025;15(2):174. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Optimism about AI's potential to improve healthcare is predominant among Palestinian nursing students, although concerns about reliability and integration persist.

    “Optimism about AI's potential to improve healthcare is predominant, although concerns about reliability and integration persist.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    The study does not extensively analyze how AI tools are currently integrated into clinical practice or their direct impact on patient care.

    “Lastly, while the study assesses students' familiarity with AI and ChatGPT, it does not extensively analyze how AI tools are currently integrated into clinical practice or their direct impact on patient care.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Barriers to AI adoption include inadequate training, lack of curriculum, and financial constraints.

    “Barriers to AI adoption include inadequate training, lack of curriculum, and financial constraints, highlighting the need for structural reforms to fully integrate AI into healthcare education and practice.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    ChatGPT, while familiar for its potential in patient care, faces mixed responses regarding its use, with some students uncertain about its effectiveness.

    “ChatGPT, while familiar for its potential in patient care, faces mixed responses regarding its use, with some students uncertain about its effectiveness.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Medical students in South Korea and Germany report that AI enhances diagnostic efficiency, reduces physician workload, and improves patient outcomes without diminishing the human role in healthcare.

    “For example, medical students in South Korea and Germany report that AI enhances diagnostic efficiency, reduces physician workload, and improves patient outcomes without diminishing the human role in healthcare [16].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [16] Khlaif ZN, Alkouk WA, Salama N, Abu EB. Redesigning Assessments for AI-Enhanced Learning: A Framework for Educators in the Generative AI Era. Educ Sci. 2025;15(2):174. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    In practice, many Palestinian nursing students have not yet fully integrated AI tools like ChatGPT into their clinical routines, with some expressing hesitance due to accuracy concerns.

    “In practice, many students have not yet fully integrated AI tools like ChatGPT into their clinical routines, with some expressing hesitance due to accuracy concerns.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    The absence of AI-focused curricula in Palestinian universities mirrors findings from other Middle Eastern institutions, where students express strong optimism about AI but struggle with its practical implementation.

    “The absence of AI-focused curricula in Palestinian universities mirrors findings from other Middle Eastern institutions, where students express strong optimism about AI (79%) but struggle with its practical implementation.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study underscores the limited integration of AI within nursing curricula, making it difficult to assess the direct impact of structured AI training on students' competencies.

    “The study also underscores the limited integration of AI within nursing curricula, making it difficult to assess the direct impact of structured AI training on students' competencies.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Study design and conductreasoning

    The study's convenience sampling technique introduces selection bias and limits the generalizability of the findings.

    “Additionally, the study utilized a convenience sampling technique, which, while practical, introduces selection bias and limits the generalizability of the findings.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Many universities in the Middle East face limitations in AI-focused curricula, insufficient training opportunities, and infrastructural barriers that hinder large-scale implementation.

    “Unlike Western counterparts, many universities in the region face limitations in AI-focused curricula, insufficient training opportunities, and infrastructural barriers that hinder large-scale implementation [7].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [7] Doumat G, Daher D, Ghanem N-N, Khater B. Knowledge and attitudes of medical students in Lebanon toward artificial intelligence: a national survey study. Front Artif Intell. 2022;5:1015418. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    ChatGPT has the potential to streamline administrative tasks, provide real-time support in patient management, and foster critical thinking.

    “as ChatGPT has the potential to streamline administrative tasks, provide real-time support in patient management, and foster critical thinking, as outlined by [13, 21].”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [13] Ahmed Z, Bhinder KK, Tariq A, Tahir MJ, Mehmood Q, Tabassum MS, et al. Knowledge, attitude, and practice of artificial intelligence among doctors and medical students in Pakistan: A cross-sectional online survey. Ann Med Surg. 2022;76:103493. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [21] Awadallah Alkouk W, Khlaif ZN. AI-resistant assessments in higher education: practical insights from faculty training workshops. Front Educ. 2024;9:1499495. source

      Not checked in the free run.

62 of 62
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    There is little research assessing how nursing students perceive and engage with AI technologies.

    “While some Palestinian universities have begun exploring AI applications in medical education, there is little research assessing how nursing students perceive and engage with these technologies.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    English proficiency is essential for interacting with AI technologies.

    “which is essential for interacting with AI technologies”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Fourth-year practice score is interpreted in the wrong direction

    Major

    Fourth-year students have the lowest practice mean among university levels in Table 10. Given the stated coding of 1 for yes and 2 for no, that does not support describing them as having the least practice.

  • University-level comfort p-value differs from Table 13

    Minor

    The text gives p = 0.006 for university-level differences in comfort using ChatGPT for patient care, while Table 13 reports 0.000 for that comparison.

  • Female share differs from Table 1

    Minor

    The results say 78% of participants were female, but Table 1 reports 215 of 304, or 70.7%.

3 of 3

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Salama, N., Bsharat, R., Alwawi, A., & Khlaif, Z. N.
Affiliations
  • Arab American University (PS)
  • Al-Quds University (PS)
  • An-Najah National University (PS)
Corresponding author
Salama, Nisreen
Venue
BMC Nursing
Published
2025-03-11
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
269-269
ISSN
1472-6955 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408338915
Cited by
42
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 25 · 2025: 17
FWCI
9.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Nursing (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
ChatGPT, artificial intelligence in nursing education, nursing students, knowledge, attitudes and practices, AI adoption barriers, Palestinian universities, West Bank, financial constraints

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review