Cited by 92Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationArtificial Intelligence in EducationArtificial Intelligence Applications

What is ChatGPT and what do we do with it? Implications of the age of AI for nursing and midwifery practice and education: an editorial

Open access
Irwin, Pauletta, Jones, Donovan, Fealy, Shanna·2023·Nurse Education Today

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.nedt.2023.105835

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Irwin, P., Jones, D., & Fealy, S.
Affiliations
Charles Sturt University (AU)
Corresponding author
Irwin, Pauletta
Venue
Nurse Education Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-08
Volume
127
Pages
105835
ISSN
0260-6917 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4379197332
Cited by
92
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nurse Education Today (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Artificial Intelligence Applications
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, artificial intelligence in nursing, midwifery practice, nursing education, midwifery education
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Midwifery, Pregnancy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review