Cited by 263Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsSmoking Behavior and Cessation

A Development and Evaluation Process for mHealth Interventions: Examples From New Zealand

Whittaker, Robyn, Merry, Sally, Dorey, Enid, Maddison, Ralph·2012·Journal of Health Communication

Abstract

The authors established a process for the development and testing of mobile phone-based health interventions that has been implemented in several mHealth interventions developed in New Zealand. This process involves a series of steps: conceptualization, formative research to inform the development, pretesting content, pilot study, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, and further qualitative research to inform improvement or implementation. Several themes underlie the entire process, including the integrity of the underlying behavior change theory, allowing for improvements on the basis of participant feedback, and a focus on implementation from the start. The strengths of this process are the involvement of the target audience in the development stages and the use of rigorous research methods to determine effectiveness. The limitations include the time required and potentially a less formalized and randomized approach than some other processes. This article aims to describe the steps and themes in the mHealth development process, using the examples of a mobile phone video messaging smoking cessation intervention and a mobile phone multimedia messaging depression prevention intervention, to stimulate discussion on these and other potential methods.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10810730.2011.649103

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Whittaker, R., Merry, S., Dorey, E., & Maddison, R.
Affiliations
University of Auckland (NZ)
Corresponding author
Whittaker, Robyn
Venue
Journal of Health Communication
Published
2012-05-02
Volume
17
Issue
sup1
Pages
11-21
ISSN
  • 1081-0730 (ISSN-L)
  • 1087-0415
OpenAlex
W2123284020
Cited by
263
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 3
FWCI
30.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Communication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
Keywords
mobile health intervention, formative research, pilot study, pragmatic randomized controlled trial, behaviour change theory, participant feedback, implementation, user participation, smoking cessation, depression prevention, video messaging, multimedia messaging
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, New Zealand, Pilot Projects, Research Design, Video Recording, Program Evaluation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Smoking Cessation, Program Development, Focus Groups, Telemedicine, Multimedia, Qualitative Research, Cell Phone, Young Adult, Health Communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review