Cited by 27Cultural Competency in Health CareIndigenous Health, Education, and RightsEmergency and Acute Care Studies

EQUIP emergency: Can interventions to reduce racism, discrimination and stigma in EDs improve outcomes?

Open access
Varcoe, Colleen, Browne, Annette J., Perrin, Nancy, Wilson, Erin, Bungay, Vicky, Byres, David, Wathen, Nadine, Stones, Cheyanne +2 more·2022·BMC Health Services Research

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite a publicly funded system, health care in Canada has been shown to be deeply inequitable, particularly toward Indigenous people. Based on research identifying key dimensions of equity-oriented health care as being cultural safety, harm reduction and trauma- and violence-informed care, an intervention to promote equity at the organizational level was tested in primary health care, refined and adapted, and tested in Emergency Departments (EDs). METHODS: In partnership with clinical, community and Indigenous leaders in three diverse EDs in one Canadian province, we supported direct care staff to tailor and implement the intervention. Intervention activities varied in type and intensity at each site. Survey data were collected pre- and post-intervention from every consecutive patient over age 18 presenting to the EDs (n = 4771) with 3315 completing post-visit questions in 4 waves at two sites and 3 waves (due to pandemic constraints) at the third. Administrative data were collected for 12 months pre- and 12 months post-intervention. RESULTS: Throughout the study period, the participating EDs were dealing with a worsening epidemic of overdoses and deaths related to a toxic drug supply, and the COVID 19 pandemic curtailed both intervention activities and data collection. Despite these constraints, staff at two of the EDs mounted equity-oriented intervention strategies; the other site was experiencing continued, significant staff shortages and leadership changeover. Longitudinal analysis using multiple regression showed non-significant but encouraging trends in patient perceptions of quality of care and patient experiences of discrimination in the ED. Subgroup analysis showed that specific groups of patients experienced care in significantly different ways at each site. An interrupted time series of administrative data showed no significant change in staff sick time, but showed a significant decrease in the percentage of patients who left without care being completed at the site with the most robust intervention activities. CONCLUSIONS: The trends in patient perceptions and the significant decrease in the percentage of patients who left without care being completed suggest potential for impact. Realization of this potential will depend on readiness, commitment and resources at the organizational and systems levels. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov #NCT03369678 (registration date November 18, 2017).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12913-022-08475-4

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PHC settings and EDs are critical contexts for addressing health equity, particularly with reductions in community-level primary care and increasing pressures on EDs.

    “PHC settings and EDs are critical contexts within which issues of health equity and inequities must be addressed, particularly in light of ongoing reductions in community-level primary care services in most jurisdictions in Canada, with concomitant and increasing pressures on EDs to bridge the gaps in care [5, 10, 24, 49].”
  • Ratings of quality of care in the SMH sample were high, with an average of 8.11 (SD 2.14) on a 0-10 scale.

    “ratings of quality of care in our sample were high, with an average of 8.11 (SD 2.14) on a scale of 0–10, as measured by an item from the British Columbia Emergency Department Patient Experiences of Care scale [10, 24, 36, 77].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 72 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [13]Mate K, Wyatt R. Health equity must be a strategic priority. NEJMCatalyst. 2017. https://catalyst.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/CAT.17.0556. · DOI
  2. [70]Kulik CT Roberson L Diversity initative effectiveness: What organizations can (and cannot) expect from diversity recruitment, diversity training, and formal mentoring programs. Diversity at Work 2010 Cambridge Cambridge University Press 265 317
  3. [78]Palis H, Bélair M-A, Hu K, Tu A, Buxton J, Slaunwhite A. Overdose deaths and the COVID-19 pandemic in British Columbia, Canada. Drug Alcohol Rev; 2021. 34908203

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Varcoe, C., Browne, A. J., Perrin, N., Wilson, E., Bungay, V., Byres, D., Wathen, N., Stones, C., Liao, C., & Price, E. R.
Affiliations
  • University of British Columbia (CA)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Northern British Columbia (CA)
  • Provincial Health Services Authority (CA)
Corresponding author
Varcoe, Colleen
Venue
BMC Health Services Research
Published
2022-09-02
Volume
22
Issue
1
Pages
1113-1113
ISSN
1472-6963 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4294119542
Cited by
27
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 1
FWCI
7.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Health Services Research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • cIRcle (University of British Columbia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (PJT148832)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Cultural Competency in Health Care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
Keywords
health equity, emergency department, Indigenous health, racism in healthcare, discrimination, stigma, cultural safety, harm reduction, organizational interventions, drug overdose, COVID-19 pandemic
MeSH terms
COVID-19, Adolescent, Canada, Delivery of Health Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Humans, Violence, Racism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review