Cited by 208Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins

Fluctuations in the incidence of type 1 diabetes in the United States from 2001 to 2015: a longitudinal study

Open access
Rogers, Mary A. M., Kim, Catherine, Banerjee, Tanima, Lee, Joyce M.·2017·BMC Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: While the United States has the largest number of children with type 1 diabetes mellitus, less is known regarding adult-onset disease. The present study utilizes nationwide data to compare the incidence of type 1 diabetes in youth (0-19 years) to that of adults (20-64 years). METHODS: In this longitudinal study, the Clinformatics® Data Mart Database was used, which contains information from 61 million commercially insured Americans (years 2001-2015). Incidence rates and exact Poisson 95% confidence intervals were calculated by age group, sex, census division, and year of diagnosis. Changes in rates over time were assessed by negative binomial regression. RESULTS: Overall, there were 32,476 individuals who developed type 1 diabetes in the cohort. The incidence rate was greatest in youth aged 10-14 years (45.5 cases/100,000 person-years); however, because adulthood spans over a longer period than childhood, there was a greater number of new cases in adults than in youth (n = 19,174 adults; n = 13,302 youth). Predominance in males was evident by age 10 and persisted throughout adulthood. The male to female incidence rate ratio was 1.32 (95% CI 1.30-1.35). The incidence rate of type 1 diabetes in youth increased by 1.9% annually from 2001 to 2015 (95% CI 1.1-2.7%; P < 0.001), but there was variation across regions. The greatest increases were in the East South Central (3.8%/year; 95% CI 2.0-5.6%; P < 0.001) and Mountain divisions (3.1%/year; 95% CI 1.6-4.6%; P < 0.001). There were also increases in the East North Central (2.7%/year; P = 0.010), South Atlantic (2.4%/year; P < 0.001), and West North Central divisions (2.4%/year; P < 0.001). In adults, however, the incidence decreased from 2001 to 2015 (-1.3%/year; 95% CI -2.3% to -0.4%; P = 0.007). Greater percentages of cases were diagnosed in January, July, and August for both youth and adults. The number of new cases of type 1 diabetes (ages 0-64 years) in the United States is estimated at 64,000 annually (27,000 cases in youth and 37,000 cases in adults). CONCLUSIONS: There are more new cases of type 1 diabetes occurring annually in the United States than previously recognized. The increase in incidence rates in youth, but not adults, suggests that the precipitating factors of youth-onset disease may differ from those of adult-onset disease.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12916-017-0958-6

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the USA Clinformatics Data Mart Database for 2001-2015, type 1 diabetes mellitus incidence was 29.2 per 100,000 in those aged 60-64 years, the highest among age groups 20-64 years.

    “A longitudinal study using the Clinformatics Data Mart Database in the USA for 2001–2015 reported an incidence of 29.2 per 100,000 people (95% CI 28.0–30.4) in those aged 60–64 years15; no data were available for ages above 64 years. The incidence was highest in the oldest age group (60–64 years) out of all age groups for ages 20–64 years.”

    From The epidemiology of type 1 diabetes mellitus in older adults (2025) · cites this paper as [15]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. [1]Patterson C Guariguata L Dahlquist G Soltész G Ogle G Silink M Diabetes in the young - a global view and worldwide estimates of numbers of children with type 1 diabetes Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014 103 2 161 175 10.1016/j.diabres.2013.11.005 24331235 · DOI
  2. [2]Hamman RF Bell RA Dabelea D D’Agostino RB Dolan L Imperatore G Lawrence JM Linder B Marcovina SM Mayer-Davis EJ Pihoker C Rodriguez BL Saydah S SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group. The SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study: rationale, findings, and future directions Diabetes Care 2014 37 12 3336 3344 10.2337/dc14-0574 25414389 PMC4237981 · DOI
  3. [4]Bruno G Gruden G Songini M Incidence of type 1 diabetes in age groups above 15 years: facts, hypothesis and prospects for future epidemiologic research Acta Diabetol 2016 53 3 339 347 10.1007/s00592-015-0835-8 26787492 · DOI
  4. [6]Chiang JL Kirkman MS Laffel LM Peters AL Type 1 Diabetes Sourcebook Authors. Type 1 diabetes through the life span: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association Diabetes Care 2014 37 7 2034 2054 10.2337/dc14-1140 24935775 PMC5865481 · DOI
  5. [8]Kumar A Leiva A Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) in Asian and European populations Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2017 33 e2890 10.1002/dmrr.2890 28198081 · DOI
  6. [9]Zhong VW Pfaff ER Beavers DP Thomas J Jaacks LM Bowlby DA Carey TS Lawrence JM Dabelea D Hamman RF Pihoker C Saydah SH Mayer-Davis EJ Search for Diabetes in Youth Study Group. Use of administrative and electronic health record data for development of automated algorithms for childhood diabetes case ascertainment and type classification: the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Pediatr Diabetes 2014 15 8 573 584 10.1111/pedi.12152 24913103 PMC4229415 · DOI
  7. [10]Vanderloo SE Johnson JA Reimer K McCrea P Nuernberger K Krueger H Aydede SK Collet JP Amed S Validation of classification algorithms for childhood diabetes identified from administrative data Pediatr Diabetes 2012 13 3 229 234 10.1111/j.1399-5448.2011.00795.x 21771232 · DOI
  8. [12]Moltchanova EV Schreier N Lammi N Karvonen M Seasonal variation of diagnosis of Type 1 diabetes mellitus in children worldwide Diabet Med 2009 26 673 678 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2009.02743.x 19573115 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Mayer-Davis EJ Lawrence JM Dabelea D Divers J Isom S Dolan L Imperatore G Linder B Marcovina S Pettitt DJ Pihoker C Saydah S Wagenknecht L SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study. Incidence trends of type 1 and type 2 diabetes among youths, 2002–2012 N Engl J Med 2017 376 15 1419 1429 10.1056/NEJMoa1610187 28402773 PMC5592722 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [14]Thunander M Petersson C Jonzon K Fornander J Ossiansson B Torn C Edvardsson S Landin-Olsson M Incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults and children in Kronoberg Sweden. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2008 82 2 247 255 10.1016/j.diabres.2008.07.022 18804305 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Bruno G Runzo C Cavallo-Perin P Merletti F Rivetti M Pinach S Novelli G Trovati M Cerutti F Pagano G Piedmont Study Group for Diabetes Epidemiology Incidence of type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults aged 30–49 years: the population-based registry in the province of Turin, Italy Diabetes Care 2005 28 11 2613 2619 10.2337/diacare.28.11.2613 16249528 · DOI
  12. [17]Maahs DM West NA Lawrence JM Mayer-Davis EJ Epidemiology of type 1 diabetes Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2010 39 3 481 497 10.1016/j.ecl.2010.05.011 20723815 PMC2925303 · DOI · Paper page
  13. [18]Lawrence JM Imperatore G Dabelea D Mayer-Davis EJ Linder B Saydah S Klingensmith GJ Dolan L Standiford DA Pihoker C Pettitt DJ Talton JW Thomas J Bell RA D’Agostino RB Jr SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group. Trends in incidence of type 1 diabetes among non-Hispanic white youth in the U.S., 2002–2009. Diabetes 2014 63 11 3938 3945 10.2337/db13-1891 24898146 PMC4207387 · DOI
  14. [19]Patterson CC Gyürüs E Rosenbauer J Cinek O Neu A Schober E Parslow RC Joner G Svensson J Castell C Bingley PJ Schoenle E Jarosz-Chobot P Urbonaité B Rothe U Krzisnik C Ionescu-Tirgoviste C Weets I Kocova M Stipancic G Samardzic M de Beaufort CE Green A Dahlquist GG Soltész G Trends in childhood type 1 diabetes incidence in Europe during 1989–2008: evidence of non-uniformity over time in rates of increase Diabetologia 2012 55 8 2142 2147 10.1007/s00125-012-2571-8 22638547 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [21]Eisenbarth GS Type I diabetes mellitus. A chronic autoimmune disease N Engl J Med 1986 314 21 1360 1368 10.1056/NEJM198605223142106 3517648 · DOI
  16. [22]Usher-Smith JA Thompson MJ Zhu H Sharp SJ Walter FM The pathway to diagnosis of type 1 diabetes in children: a questionnaire study BMJ Open. 2015 5 e006470 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006470 25783422 PMC4368911 · DOI
  17. [23]Rhodes ET Laffel LM Gonzalez TV Ludwig DS Accuracy of administrative coding for type 2 diabetes in children, adolescents, and young adults Diabetes Care 2007 30 1 141 143 10.2337/dc06-1142 17192348 · DOI
  18. [24]Spaans EA Kleefstra N van Hateren KJ Aanstoot HJ Bilo HJ Brand PL Metformin in adolescents and adults with type 1 diabetes mellitus: not evidence-based Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2011 155 39 A3166 21961686
  19. [25]Østergaard JA Laugesen E Leslie RD Should there be concern about autoimmune diabetes in adults? Current evidence and controversies Curr Diab Rep 2016 16 9 82 10.1007/s11892-016-0780-0 27457237 · DOI
  20. [26]Rolandsson O Palmer JP Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults (LADA) is dead: long live autoimmune diabetes! Diabetologia. 2010 53 7 1250 1253 10.1007/s00125-010-1713-0 20336277 · DOI
  21. [27]Schwartz SS Epstein S Corkey BE Grant SF Gavin JR Aguilar RB The time is right for a new classification system for diabetes: rationale and implications of the β-cell-centric classification schema Diabetes Care 2016 39 2 179 186 10.2337/dc15-1585 26798148 PMC5317235 · DOI
  22. [30]Bruno G Maule M Biggeri A Ledda A Mannu C Merletti F Songini M Sardinian Group for Diabetes Epidemiology More than 20 years of registration of type 1 diabetes in Sardinian children: temporal variations of incidence with age, period of diagnosis, and year of birth Diabetes 2013 62 10 3542 3546 10.2337/db12-1771 23835336 PMC3781461 · DOI
  23. [31]Yip PS Bruno G Tajima N Seber GA Buckland ST Cormack RM Unwin N Chang Y Fienberg SE Junker BW LaPorte RE Capture-recapture and multiple-record systems estimation II: applications in human diseases Am J Epidemiol 1995 142 10 1059 1068 7485051

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rogers, M. A. M., Kim, C., Banerjee, T., & Lee, J. M.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Rogers, Mary A. M.
Venue
BMC Medicine
Published
2017-11-08
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
199-199
ISSN
1741-7015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2768019234
Cited by
208
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11
FWCI
9.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (ULTR000433)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, incidence trends, adult-onset type 1 diabetes, type 1 diabetes in children, sex differences in incidence, regional variation, temporal trends, commercially insured population, diabetes epidemiology, United States
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, United States, Incidence, Age of Onset, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review