Cited by 133Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealthcare Systems and PracticesHealth Services Management and Policy

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 115 of the 118 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The unpredictable journeys of spreading, sustaining and scaling healthcare innovations: a scoping review

Open access
Côté-Boileau, Élizabeth, Denis, Jean-Louis, Callery, Bill, Sabean, Meghan·2019·Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract

Innovation has the potential to improve the quality of care and health service delivery, but maximising the reach and impact of innovation to achieve large-scale health system transformation remains understudied. Interest is growing in three processes of the innovation journey within health systems, namely the spread, sustainability and scale-up (3S) of innovation. Recent reviews examine what we know about these processes. However, there is little research on how to support and operationalise the 3S. This study aims to improve our understanding of the 3S of healthcare innovations. We focus specifically on the definitions of the 3S, the mechanisms that underpin them, and the conditions that either enable or limit their potential. We conducted a scoping review, systematically investigating six bibliographic databases to search, screen and select relevant literature on the 3S of healthcare innovations. We screened 641 papers, then completed a full-text review of 112 identified as relevant based on title and abstract. A total of 24 papers were retained for analysis. Data were extracted and synthesised through descriptive and inductive thematic analysis. From this, we develop a framework of actionable guidance for health system actors aiming to leverage the 3S of innovation across five key areas of focus, as follows: (1) focus on the why, (2) focus on perceived-value and feasibility, (3) focus on what people do, rather than what they should be doing, (4) focus on creating a dialogue between policy and delivery, and (5) focus on inclusivity and capacity building. While there is no standardised approach to foster the 3S of healthcare innovations, a variety of practical frameworks and tools exist to support stakeholders along this journey.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12961-019-0482-6

Cites

115 of 115 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Scoping review search process flow chart
Fig. 1 Scoping review search process flow chartCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Mechanisms involved in the 3S of healthcare innovations
Fig. 2 Mechanisms involved in the 3S of healthcare innovationsCC BY · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Framework of actionable guidance for 3S across five key focus areas
Fig. 3 Framework of actionable guidance for 3S across five key focus areasCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. Health Quality Ontario. Quality Improvement Primers: Spread Primer. Queens, Ontario: Health Quality Ontario; 2013.
  2. Slaghuis SS. Riding the Waves of Quality Improvement: Sustainability and Spread in a Dutch Quality Improvement Program for Long-Term Care [PhD Thesis]. Rotterdam: Erasmus MC: University Medical Center; 2016.
  3. Denis J-L, Usher S, Baker GR, Côté-Boileau É, Normandin JM. Transcending the Paradigm Freeze: Narratives of Reform in Canadian Health Systems. Copenhagen: 33rd European Group for Organizational Studies Colloquium; 2017.
  4. Massoud MR, Nielsen GA, Nolan K, Schall MW, Sevin C. A Framework for Spread: From Local Improvements to System-Wide Change. In: IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2006.
  5. Clinical Excellence Commission. Enhancing Project Spread and Sustainability – A Companion to the ‘Easy Guide to Clinical Practice Improvement’. Sydney: CEC; 2008.
  6. Gabriel M. Making It Big: Strategies for Scaling Social Innovations: Nesta; 2014. https://media.nesta.org.uk/documents/making_it_big-web.pdf . Accessed 1 Sept 2019.
  7. Plsek P. Complexity and the adoption of innovation in health care. Accelerating Quality Improvement in Health Care: Strategies to Accelerate the Diffusion of Evidence-Based Innovations. Washington, DC: National Institute for Healthcare Management Foundation and National Committee for Quality in Health Care; 2003.
  8. Edwards N. Scaling-up Health Innovations and Interventions in Public Health: A Brief Review of the Current State-of-the-Science; 2010. p. 1–45. http://scholar.google.com/scholar_url?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.ihi.org%2Feducation%2FDocuments%2FProgramMaterials%2FScaleUpBlog%2F7a_Commissioned_Paper%25202_Public_Health.doc&hl=fr&sa=T&oi=gga&ct=gga&cd=0&d=6900197457064837426&ei=BdlnXdCEJYOAywTs3Lr4Dg&scisig=AAGBfm3Q32oKoRhWvjh1bLn-bvO5nXFIKw&nossl=1&ws=1366x643&at=Scaling-up%20health%20innovations%20and%20interventions%20in%20public%20health%3A%20a%20brief%20review%20of%20the%20current%20state-of-the-science . Accessed 1 Sept 2019
  9. Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement. The Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement Spread Plan. 2014. https://www.cfhi-fcass.ca/sf-docs/default-source/work-with-us/4june2014-spreadplan.docx . Accessed 1 Sept 2019.
  10. Fulop N, Robert G. Context for Successful Quality Improvement. London: The Health Foundation; 2015. https://www.health.org.uk/publications/context-for-successful-quality-improvement . Accessed 1 Sept 2019
  11. Denis J-L. Taking Stock of Healthcare Reforms: A Reseach Program on Transformative Capacity of Healthcare Systems in Canada. Ottawa: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Government of Canada; 2015.
  12. Hayes C. The Highly Adaptable Improvement Model. Toronto: Acute Care for Elders (ACE) Collaborative Workshop, Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement; 2016.
  13. Burns L, Bradley E, Weiner B. Shortell and Kaluzny’s Healthcare Management: Organization Design and Behavior. Boston: Cengage Learning; 2011.
  14. Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic Evaluation. London: Sage; 1997.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 133

Metadata

Authors
Côté-Boileau, É., Denis, J.-L., Callery, B., & Sabean, M.
Affiliations
  • Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement (CA)
Corresponding author
Côté-Boileau, Élizabeth
Venue
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published
2019-09-13
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
84-84
ISSN
1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2972745945
Cited by
133
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Canadian Foundation for Healthcare Improvement
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Practices
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Services Management and Policy
Keywords
healthcare innovation, diffusion of innovations, innovation sustainability, health system transformation, innovation framework, perceived value, feasibility, inclusivity, capacity building, health system actors
MeSH terms
Delivery of Health Care, Diffusion of Innovation, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review