Cited by 143Urban Transport and AccessibilityBehavioral Health and InterventionsTransportation Planning and Optimization

Efficacy of behavioural interventions for transport behaviour change: Systematic review, meta-analysis and intervention coding

Open access
Arnott, Bronia, Rehackova, Lucia, Errington, Linda, Sniehotta, Falko F, Roberts, Jennifer, Araujo-Soares, Vera·2014·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Reducing reliance on motorised transport and increasing use of more physically active modes of travel may offer an opportunity to address physical inactivity. This review evaluates the evidence for the effects of behavioural interventions to reduce car use for journeys made by adults and codes intervention development and content. METHODS: The review follows the procedure stated in the registration protocol published in the PROSPERO database (registration number CRD42011001797). Controlled studies evaluating behavioural interventions to reduce car use compared with no interventions or alternative interventions on outcome measures of transport behaviours taken in adult participants are included in this review. Searches were conducted on all records in Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts (ASSIA), Ovid Embase, Ovid Medline, Ovid PsycInfo, Scopus, Sociological Abstracts, Transportation Research Information Service (TRIS), Transportation Research International Documentation (TRID), and Web of Science databases. Peer reviewed publications in English language meeting the inclusion criteria are eligible. Methodological quality is assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Interventions are categorised in terms of behavioural frameworks, theories and techniques. RESULTS: 15 full text articles are included, representing 13 unique studies, with 4895 participants and 27 intervention arms. Risk of bias across the review is appraised as considerable due to the unclear methodological quality of individual studies. Heterogeneity of included studies is considerable. Meta-analyses reveal no significant effect on reduction of frequency of car use or on increasing the proportion of journeys by alternative, more active modes of transport. There is insufficient data relating to alternative outcomes such as distance and duration which may have important health implications. Interventions were top-down but could not be described as theory-based. Intervention efficacy was associated with the use of a combination of information provision and behavioural regulation techniques. There was a lack of consideration of opportunity for change and behaviour in context. CONCLUSIONS: There is no evidence for the efficacy of existing behavioural interventions to reduce car trips included in this review. The evidence for efficacy of behavioural interventions to decrease distance and duration of car journeys is limited and inconclusive. Overall the evidence is highly heterogeneous and is at considerable risk of bias. Future research should investigate alternative behavioural interventions in high quality, controlled studies informed by existing evidence, theory, and viewers of potential users. Future intervention studies should increase scientific rigour, include objective outcome measures, and incorporate thorough evaluations as standard.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-014-0133-9

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [7]World Health Organisation: Global Recommendations on Physical Activity for Health. 2010. 26180873
  2. [46]Dombrowski S Ingredients in complex behavioural interventions for obese adults with obesity-related co-morbidities or additional risk factors for co-morbidities: a systematic review. Psychol Rev 2012 44 1 43

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arnott, B., Rehackova, L., Errington, L., Sniehotta, F. F., Roberts, J., & Araujo-Soares, V.
Affiliations
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • University of Sheffield (GB)
Corresponding author
Arnott, Bronia
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2014-11-28
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
133-133
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2111886427
Cited by
143
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York) (acceptedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity) (cc-by)
Funders
  • Newcastle University
  • Medical Research Council (MR/K02325X/1)
  • Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J004715/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Transportation › Transportation Planning and Optimization
Keywords
travel behavior change, car use reduction, behavioral interventions, active travel, physical inactivity, information provision
MeSH terms
Automobile Driving, Health Promotion, Humans, Motor Activity, Health Behavior, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review