Cited by 182Behavioral Health and InterventionsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorBehavioral and Psychological Studies

Putting habit into practice, and practice into habit: a process evaluation and exploration of the acceptability of a habit-based dietary behaviour change intervention

Open access
Gardner, Benjamin, Sheals, Kate, Wardle, Jane, McGowan, Laura·2014·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Forming 'habit' - defined as a learned process that generates automatic responses to contextual cues - has been suggested as a mechanism for behaviour maintenance, but few studies have applied habit theory to behaviour change. This study used process evaluation data, taken from a randomised controlled trial of a healthy child-feeding intervention for parents previously shown to be effective, to explore the applicability to dietary behaviour change of predictions and recommendations drawn from habit theory. The intervention supported parents in pursuing child-feeding habit goals in three domains (giving fruit and vegetables, water, healthy snacks), over four fortnightly home visits. We explored whether (a) the habit-formation model was acceptable to participants, (b) better-specified habit-formation goals yielded greater habit gains, and (c) habit gains were sustained (d) even when subsequent, new habit goals were pursued. METHODS: Qualitative and quantitative data were taken from 57 parents randomised to the intervention arm, and so analyses presented here used a pre-post intervention design. Thematic analysis of post-intervention qualitative interviews evaluated acceptability, and self-reported habit goals were content-analysed. ANOVAs explored changes in habit strength, recorded at home visits and one- and two-month follow-ups, across time and goals. RESULTS: Participants understood and engaged positively with the habit-formation approach. Although many seemingly poorly-specified habit goals were set, goal characteristics had minimal impact on habit strength, which were achieved within two weeks for all behaviours (p's < .001), and were maintained or had increased further by the final follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The habit-formation model appears to be an acceptable and fruitful basis for dietary behaviour change.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-014-0135-7

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The few interventions built on the three components of habit formation have yielded promising results for weight loss and consumption of healthy food in families.

    “The few interventions built on the three components of habit formation have yielded promising results for weight loss (Carels et al. 2014, Lally et al. 2008) and consumption of healthy food in families (Gardner et al. 2014).”

    From Psychology of Habit. (2016) · cites this paper as Gardner et al. 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 17

  1. [1]Danaei G Ding EL Mozaffarian D Taylor B Rehm J Murray CJ Ezzati M The preventable causes of death in the United States: comparative risk assessment of dietary, lifestyle, and metabolic risk factors PLoS Med 2009 6 e1000058 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000058 19399161 PMC2667673 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [7]Verplanken B Aarts H Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: Is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity? Eur Rev Soc Psychol 1999 10 101 134 10.1080/14792779943000035 · DOI
  3. [8]Tobias R Changing behavior by memory aids: a social psychological model of prospective memory and habit development tested with dynamic field data Psychol Rev 2009 116 408 438 10.1037/a0015512 19348548 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [10]Verplanken B Aarts H Van Knippenberg A Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices Eur J Soc Psychol 1997 27 539 560 10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199709/10)27:5<539::AID-EJSP831>3.0.CO;2-A · DOI
  5. [12]Armitage CJ Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychol 2005 24 235 245 10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.235 15898858 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [13]Verplanken B Wood W Interventions to break and create consumer habits J Pub Policy Marketing 2006 25 90 103 10.1509/jppm.25.1.90 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [16]Carels RA Burmeister JM Koball AM Oehlhof MW Hinman N LeRoy M Bannon E Ashrafloun L Storfer-Isser A Darby LA Gumble A A randomized trial comparing two approaches to weight loss: differences in weight loss maintenance J Health Psychol 2014 19 296 311 10.1177/1359105312470156 23349402 PMC3883879 · DOI
  8. [17]McGowan L Cooke LJ Gardner B Beeken RJ Croker H Wardle J Healthy feeding habits: efficacy results from a cluster-randomized, controlled exploratory trial of a novel, habit-based intervention with parents Am J Clin Nutr 2013 98 769 777 10.3945/ajcn.112.052159 23864536 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [21]Craig P Dieppe P Macintyre S Michie S Nazareth I Petticrew M Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance BMJ 2008 337 a1655 10.1136/bmj.a1655 18824488 PMC2769032 · DOI · Paper page
  10. [23]Lally P Wardle J Gardner B Experiences of habit formation: A qualitative study Psychol Health Med 2011 16 484 489 10.1080/13548506.2011.555774 21749245 · DOI
  11. [24]Curran-Everett D Milgrom H Post-hoc data analysis: benefits and limitations Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2013 13 223 224 23571411
  12. [26]Gardner B Abraham C Lally P de Bruijn G-J Towards parsimony in habit measurement: Testing the convergent and predictive validity of an automaticity subscale of the Self-Report Habit Index Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2012 9 102 10.1186/1479-5868-9-102 22935297 PMC3552971 · DOI
  13. [30]Adriaanse MA Gollwitzer PM de Ridder DTD de Wit JBF Kroese FM Breaking habits with implementation intentions: A test of underlying processes Pers Soc Psychol Bull 2011 37 502 513 10.1177/0146167211399102 21317315 · DOI
  14. [31]McDaniel MA Einstein GO Strategic and automatic processes in prospective memory retrieval: A multiprocess framework Appl Cog Psychol 2000 14 S127 S144 10.1002/acp.775 · DOI · Paper page
  15. [33]Fleig L Lippke S Pomp S Schwarzer R Intervention effects of exercise self-regulation on physical exercise and eating fruits and vegetables: A longitudinal study in orthopedic and cardiac rehabilitation Prev Med 2011 53 182 187 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.06.019 21784096 · DOI
  16. [34]Pearson N Atkin AJ Biddle SJH Gorely T A family-based intervention to increase fruit and vegetable consumption in adolescents: a pilot study Pub Health Nutr 2010 13 876 885 10.1017/S1368980010000121 20196908 · DOI
  17. [35]Judah G Gardner B Aunger R Forming a flossing habit: an exploratory study of the psychological determinants of habit formation Br J Health Psychol 2013 18 338 353 10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02086.x 22989272 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gardner, B., Sheals, K., Wardle, J., & McGowan, L.
Affiliations
University College London (GB)
Corresponding author
Gardner, Benjamin
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2014-10-30
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
135-135
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2171942449
Cited by
182
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 4
FWCI
11.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Cancer Research UK (14133)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Behavioral and Psychological Studies
Keywords
habit formation, habit theory, dietary behavior change, child feeding, parental feeding practices, fruit and vegetable intake, water intake, healthy snacks, behavior maintenance, treatment acceptability, home visits
MeSH terms
Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Diet, Feeding Behavior, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fruit, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Parents, Pilot Projects, Socioeconomic Factors, Vegetables, Health Behavior, Cluster Analysis, Young Adult, Food, Organic, Snacks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review