Cited by 77Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsNutrition, Health and Food BehaviorDigital Mental Health Interventions

Iterative development of Vegethon: a theory-based mobile app intervention to increase vegetable consumption

Open access
Mummah, Sarah A., King, Abby C., Gardner, Christopher D., Sutton, Stephen·2016·International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mobile technology may serve as a cost-effective and scalable tool for delivering behavioral nutrition interventions. This research sought to iteratively develop a theory-driven mobile app, Vegethon, to increase vegetable consumption. METHODS: Development of Vegethon followed phases outlined by the IDEAS framework: 1) empathize with users (qualitative interviews, n = 18); 2) specify target behavior; 3) ground in behavioral theory; 4) ideate implementation strategies; 5) prototype potential products; 6) gather user feedback (qualitative interviews, n = 14; questionnaire, n = 41); 7) build minimum viable product; and 8) pilot potential efficacy and usability (pilot RCT, n = 17). Findings from each phase informed subsequent phases. The target population that informed intervention development was 18-50 years of age, had BMIs of 28-40 kg/m(2), and lived in the geographical area surrounding Stanford University. A full description of the final version of Vegethon is included in the paper. RESULTS: Qualitative findings that shaped initial intervention conception were: participants' interests in accountability without judgment; their desire for simple and efficient dietary self-monitoring; and the importance of planning meals in advance. Qualitative findings identified during intervention refinement were the need for a focus on vegetable self-monitoring; inclusion of vegetable challenges; simplification of features; advice and inspiration for eating vegetables; reminder notifications; and peer comparison. Pilot RCT findings suggested the initial efficacy, acceptance, and feasibility of the intervention. The final version of Vegethon enabled easy self-monitoring of vegetable consumption and included a range of features designed to engage the user (e.g., surprise challenges; leaderboard; weekly reports). Vegethon was coded for its inclusion of 18 behavior change techniques (BCTs) (e.g., goal setting; feedback; social comparison; prompts/cues; framing/reframing; identity). CONCLUSIONS: Vegethon is a theory-based, user-informed mobile intervention that was systematically developed using the IDEAS framework. Vegethon targets increased vegetable consumption among overweight adults and is currently being evaluated in a randomized controlled efficacy trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials.gov: NCT01826591.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12966-016-0400-z

Cites

81 of 81 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Traditional behavior change theories might be too static to integrate into adaptive eHealth technologies, especially in the case of just-in-time personalized interventions.

    “Third, traditional behavior change theories might be too static to integrate into adaptive eHealth technologies, especially in the case of just-in-time personalized interventions.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mummah, S. A., King, A. C., Gardner, C. D., & Sutton, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • Mummah, Sarah A.
  • King, Abby C.
  • Gardner, Christopher D.
  • Sutton, Stephen
Venue
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
Published
2016-08-08
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
90-90
ISSN
1479-5868 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2508282915
Cited by
77
References
81
Citations by year
2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6
FWCI
18.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Apollo (cc-by)
Funders
  • Gates Cambridge Trust
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK0091831)
  • Nutrition Science Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
Keywords
mobile health intervention, vegetable consumption, dietary self-monitoring, IDEAS framework, behaviour change techniques, overweight adults, user-centered design, meal planning, social comparison, peer competition, dietary behavior change
MeSH terms
Adult, Behavior Therapy, Diet, Eating, Feasibility Studies, Feedback, Feeding Behavior, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Obesity, Pilot Projects, Surveys and Questionnaires, Vegetables, Health Behavior, Telemedicine, Overweight, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review