Cited by 219Health Policy Implementation ScienceGlobal Health and SurgeryHealthcare Systems and Practices

Toward the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review and conceptual framework

Open access
Iwelunmor, Juliet, Blackstone, Sarah, Veira, Dorice, Nwaozuru, Ucheoma, Airhihenbuwa, Collins, Munodawafa, Davison, Kalipeni, Ezekiel, Jutal, Antar +2 more·2015·Implementation Science

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is facing a double burden of disease with a rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) while the burden of communicable diseases (CDs) remains high. Despite these challenges, there remains a significant need to understand how or under what conditions health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa are sustained. The purpose of this study was to conduct a systematic review of empirical literature to explore how health interventions implemented in SSA are sustained. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, Biological Abstracts, CINAHL, Embase, PsycInfo, SCIELO, Web of Science, and Google Scholar for available research investigating the sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa. We also used narrative synthesis to examine factors whether positive or negative that may influence the sustainability of health interventions in the region. RESULTS: The search identified 1819 citations, and following removal of duplicates and our inclusion/exclusion criteria, only 41 papers were eligible for inclusion in the review. Twenty-six countries were represented in this review, with Kenya and Nigeria having the most representation of available studies examining sustainability. Study dates ranged from 1996 to 2015. Of note, majority of these studies (30 %) were published in 2014. The most common framework utilized was the sustainability framework, which was discussed in four of the studies. Nineteen out of 41 studies (46 %) reported sustainability outcomes focused on communicable diseases, with HIV and AIDS represented in majority of the studies, followed by malaria. Only 21 out of 41 studies had clear definitions of sustainability. Community ownership and mobilization were recognized by many of the reviewed studies as crucial facilitators for intervention sustainability, both early on and after intervention implementation, while social and ecological conditions as well as societal upheavals were barriers that influenced the sustainment of interventions in sub-Saharan Africa. CONCLUSION: The sustainability of health interventions implemented in sub-Saharan Africa is inevitable given the double burden of diseases, health care worker shortage, weak health systems, and limited resources. We propose a conceptual framework that draws attention to sustainability as a core component of the overall life cycle of interventions implemented in the region.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13012-016-0392-8

Cites

78 of 78 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent review of 41 studies across 26 countries in sub-Saharan Africa suggests that community engagement, community resources, and mobilization may be unique influences on sustainability in such contexts.

    “A recent review of 41 studies across 26 countries in sub-Saharan Africa suggests that community engagement, community resources, and mobilization may be unique influences on sustainability in such contexts (63).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 79 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iwelunmor, J., Blackstone, S., Veira, D., Nwaozuru, U., Airhihenbuwa, C., Munodawafa, D., Kalipeni, E., Jutal, A., Shelley, D., & Ogedegbe, G.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • New York University (US)
  • Saint Louis University (US)
  • World Health Organization Regional Office for Africa (CG)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Iwelunmor, Juliet
Venue
Implementation Science
Published
2015-12
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
43-43
ISSN
1748-5908 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2305876132
Cited by
219
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 27 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 13 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
1.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Implementation Science (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Fogarty International Center (R03TW010081)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare Systems and Practices
Keywords
sub-Saharan Africa, community ownership, community mobilization, HIV/AIDS, malaria, double burden of disease, non-communicable diseases, health care system, conceptual framework, barriers to sustainability
MeSH terms
Chronic Disease, Delivery of Health Care, Health Resources, Humans, Cost of Illness, Africa South of the Sahara

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review