CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Enigmatic Orthology Relationships between Hox Clusters of the African Butterfly Fish and Other Teleosts Following Ancient Whole-Genome Duplication

Martin, Kyle J., Holland, Peter W.H.·2014·Molecular Biology and Evolution
DOI 10.1093/molbev/msu202PMC PMC4166920
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/msu202

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Our results provide the first genome-wide support for delayed rediploidization in teleosts following the TGD.

    “Our results provide the first genome-wide support for delayed rediploidization in teleosts following the TGD, previously suggested as one potential explanation for the enigmatic evolutionary history of the Hox and rhodopsin genes in teleosts, and of several gene families in eels (Martin and Holland 2014; Nakamura et al. 2017; Rozenfeld et al. 2019).”

    From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Martin and Holland 2014

  • It remains unclear whether the teleost whole-genome duplication corresponds to an ancestral auto- or allotetraploidization event.

    “It remains unclear whether the teleost whole-genome duplication corresponds to an ancestral auto- or an allotetraploidization event, a significant gap in our understanding of the early vertebrate evolutionary processes that led to the diversification of teleosts (Martin and Holland 2014; Conant 2020).”

    From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Martin and Holland 2014

  • "a" and "b" gene assignments are not informative of the underlying sequence information contained in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization.

    “As such, “a” and “b” gene assignments are not informative of the underlying sequence information contained in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization, and these genes should be considered as tetralogs rather than paralogs and orthologs (Martin and Holland 2014; Robertson et al. 2017).”

    From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Martin and Holland 2014

  • Genes in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization should be considered as tetralogs rather than paralogs and orthologs.

    “As such, “a” and “b” gene assignments are not informative of the underlying sequence information contained in genomic regions that showed delayed rediploidization, and these genes should be considered as tetralogs rather than paralogs and orthologs (Martin and Holland 2014; Robertson et al. 2017).”

    From An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication (2022) · cites this paper as Martin and Holland 2014

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. Alfaro, 2009, Nine exceptional radiations plus high turnover explain species diversity in jawed vertebrates, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 106, 13410, 10.1073/pnas.0811087106 · DOI
  2. Allendorf, 1997, Secondary tetrasomic segregation of MDH-B and preferential pairing of homeologues in rainbow trout, Genetics, 145, 1083, 10.1093/genetics/145.4.1083 · DOI
  3. Allendorf, 1984, Tetraploidy and the evolution of salmonid fishes, 10.1007/978-1-4684-4652-4_1 · DOI
  4. Altschul, 1990, Basic Local Alignment Search Tool, J Mol Biol., 215, 403, 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Amores, 1998, Zebrafish hox clusters and vertebrate genome evolution, Science, 282, 1711, 10.1126/science.282.5394.1711 · DOI
  6. Amores, 2004, Developmental roles of pufferfish Hox clusters and genome evolution in ray-fin fish, Genome Res., 14, 1, 10.1101/gr.1717804 · DOI
  7. Arratia, 1997, Basal teleosts and teleostean phylogeny, Palaeo Ichthyol., 7, 5
  8. Becak, 1966, Cytological evidence of constant tetraploidy in the bisexual South American frog Odontophrynus americanus, Chromosoma, 19, 188, 10.1007/BF00293683 · DOI
  9. Berthelot, 2014, The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates, Nat Commun., 5, 3657, 10.1038/ncomms4657 · DOI
  10. Capella-Gutiérrez, 2009, trimAl: a tool for automated alignment trimming in large-scale phylogenetic analyses, Bioinformatics, 25, 1972, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp348 · DOI
  11. Chambers, 2009, Hox cluster duplication in the basal teleost Hiodon alosoides (Osteoglossomorpha), Theory Biosci., 128, 109, 10.1007/s12064-009-0056-1 · DOI
  12. Chester, 2012, Extensive chromosomal variation in a recently formed natural allopolyploid species, Tragopogon miscellus (Asteraceae), Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 109, 1176, 10.1073/pnas.1112041109 · DOI
  13. Christoffels, 2004, Fugu genome analysis provides evidence for a whole-genome duplication early during the evolution of ray-finned fishes, Mol Biol Evol., 21, 1146, 10.1093/molbev/msh114 · DOI
  14. Coppe, 2010, Sequencing, de novo annotation and analysis of the first Anguilla anguilla transcriptome: EeelBase opens new perspectives for the study of the critically endangered European eel, BMC Genomics, 11, 635, 10.1186/1471-2164-11-635 · DOI
  15. Crow, 2012, An independent genome duplication inferred from Hox paralogs in the American paddlefish—a representative basal ray-finned fish and important comparative reference, Genome Biol Evol., 4, 937, 10.1093/gbe/evs067 · DOI
  16. Crow, 2006, The “fish-specific” Hox cluster duplication is coincident with the origin of teleosts, Mol Biol Evol., 23, 121, 10.1093/molbev/msj020 · DOI
  17. Dayhoff, 1976, Origin and evolution of protein superfamilies, Fed Proc., 35, 2132
  18. Demuth, 2009, The life and death of gene families, BioEssays, 31, 29, 10.1002/bies.080085 · DOI
  19. Dolinski, 2007, Orthology and functional conservation in eukaryotes, Annu Rev Genet., 41, 465, 10.1146/annurev.genet.40.110405.090439 · DOI
  20. Doyle, 2010, Dating the origins of polyploidy events, New Phytol., 186, 73, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03118.x · DOI
  21. Edger, 2009, Gene and genome duplications: the impact of dosage-sensitivity on the fate of nuclear genes, Chromosome Res., 17, 699, 10.1007/s10577-009-9055-9 · DOI
  22. Escriva, 2002, Analysis of lamprey and hagfish genes reveals a complex history of gene duplications during early vertebrate evolution, Mol Biol Evol., 19, 1440, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a004207 · DOI
  23. Fitch, 1970, Distinguishing homologous from analogous proteins, Syst Zool., 19, 99, 10.2307/2412448 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Freeling, 2006, Gene-balanced duplications, like tetraploidy, provide predictable drive to increase morphological complexity, Genome Res., 16, 805, 10.1101/gr.3681406 · DOI
  25. Fujimoto, 2013, Non-parsimonious evolution of hagfish Dlx genes, BMC Evol Biol., 13, 15, 10.1186/1471-2148-13-15 · DOI
  26. Gaeta, 2007, Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype, Plant Cell, 19, 3403, 10.1105/tpc.107.054346 · DOI
  27. Garcia-Fernàndez, 1994, Archetypal organization of the amphioxus Hox gene cluster, Nature, 370, 563, 10.1038/370563a0 · DOI
  28. Gaut, 1997, DNA sequence evidence for the segmental allotetraploid origin of maize, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 94, 6809, 10.1073/pnas.94.13.6809 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Gharbi, 2006, A linkage map for brown trout (Salmo trutta): chromosome homeologies and comparative genome organization with other salmonid fish, Genetics, 172, 2405, 10.1534/genetics.105.048330 · DOI
  30. Henkel, 2012, Primitive duplicate Hox clusters in the European eel’s genome, PLoS One, 7, e32231, 10.1371/journal.pone.0032231 · DOI
  31. Henkel, 2012, First draft genome sequence of the Japanese eel, Anguilla japonica, Gene, 511, 195, 10.1016/j.gene.2012.09.064 · DOI
  32. Hilton, 2003, Comparative osteology and phylogenetic systematics of fossil and living bony-tongue fishes (Actinopterygii, Teleostei, Osteoglossomorpha), Zool J Linn Soc., 137, 1, 10.1046/j.1096-3642.2003.00032.x · DOI
  33. Hinegardner, 1972, Cellular DNA content and the evolution of teleostean fishes, Museum, 106, 621
  34. Hoegg, 2007, Comparative phylogenomic analyses of teleost fish Hox gene clusters: lessons from the cichlid fish Astatotilapia burtoni, BMC Genomics, 8, 317, 10.1186/1471-2164-8-317 · DOI
  35. Hoegg, 2004, Phylogenetic timing of the fish-specific genome duplication correlates with the diversification of teleost fish, J Mol Evol., 59, 190, 10.1007/s00239-004-2613-z · DOI
  36. Holland, 1994, Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development, Development, 1994, 125, 10.1242/dev.1994.Supplement.125 · DOI
  37. Huang, 1999, CAP3: A DNA sequence assembly program, Genome Res., 9, 868, 10.1101/gr.9.9.868 · DOI · Paper page
  38. Huelsenbeck, 2001, MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees, Bioinformatics, 17, 754, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.8.754 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hurley, 2007, A new time-scale for ray-finned fish evolution, Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci., 274, 489, 10.1098/rspb.2006.3749 · DOI
  40. Inoue, 2001, A mitogenomic perspective on the basal teleostean phylogeny: resolving higher-level relationships with longer DNA sequences, Mol Phylogenet Evol., 20, 275, 10.1006/mpev.2001.0970 · DOI
  41. Inoue, 2003, Basal actinopterygian relationships: a mitogenomic perspective on the phylogeny of the “ancient fish.”, Mol Phylogenet Evol., 26, 110, 10.1016/S1055-7903(02)00331-7 · DOI
  42. Irvine, 2002, Genomic analysis of Hox clusters in the sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus, J Exp Zool., 62, 47, 10.1002/jez.10090 · DOI
  43. Johnson, 2013, Next-generation phylogenomics using a Target Restricted Assembly Method, Mol Phylogenet Evol., 66, 417, 10.1016/j.ympev.2012.09.007 · DOI
  44. Johnson, 1987, Linkage relationships reflecting ancestral tetraploidy in salmonid fish, Genetics, 116, 579, 10.1093/genetics/116.4.579 · DOI
  45. King, 2011, A natural deletion of the HoxC cluster in elasmobranch fishes, Science, 334, 1517, 10.1126/science.1210912 · DOI
  46. Koonin, 2005, Orthologs, paralogs, and evolutionary genomics, Annu Rev Genet., 39, 309, 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.114725 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Kosakovsky Pond, 2011, A random effects branch-site model for detecting episodic diversifying selection, Mol Biol Evol., 24, 1
  48. Kuraku, 2008, Insights into cyclostome phylogenomics: pre-2R or post-2R, Zool Sci., 25, 960, 10.2108/zsj.25.960 · DOI
  49. Kuraku, 2010, Palaeophylogenomics of the vertebrate ancestor—impact of hidden paralogy on hagfish and lamprey gene phylogeny, Integr Comp Biol., 50, 124, 10.1093/icb/icq044 · DOI
  50. Larkin, 2007, Clustal W and Clustal X version 2.0, Bioinformatics, 23, 2947, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm404 · DOI
  51. Le HLV, 1993, A 28S rRNA-based phylogeny of the gnathostomes—first steps in athe analysis of conflict and congruence with morphologically based cladeograms, Mol Phylogenet Evol., 2, 31, 10.1006/mpev.1993.1005 · DOI
  52. Lee, 2010, Ancient vertebrate conserved noncoding elements have been evolving rapidly in teleost fishes, Mol Biol Evol., 28, 1205, 10.1093/molbev/msq304 · DOI
  53. Lee, 1981, Mitotic and meiotic analyses of brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, J Hered., 72, 321, 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a109515 · DOI
  54. Li, 2001, Evolutionary analyses of the human genome, Nature, 409, 847, 10.1038/35057039 · DOI
  55. Li, 2011, The origin of natural tetraploid loach Misgurnus anguillicaudatus (Teleostei: Cobitidae) inferred from meiotic chromosome configurations, Genetica, 139, 805, 10.1007/s10709-011-9585-x · DOI
  56. Liang, 2011, A general scenario of Hox gene inventory variation among major sarcopterygian lineages, BMC Evol Biol., 11, 25, 10.1186/1471-2148-11-25 · DOI
  57. Lin, 2008, Ultraconserved coding regions outside the homeobox of mammalian Hox genes, BMC Evol Biol., 8, 260, 10.1186/1471-2148-8-260 · DOI
  58. Mable, 2004, “Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants”: myths and mechanisms, Biol J Linn Soc Lond., 82, 453, 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2004.00332.x · DOI
  59. Makino, 2010, Ohnologs in the human genome are dosage balanced and frequently associated with disease, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 107, 9270, 10.1073/pnas.0914697107 · DOI
  60. Málaga-Trillo, 2001, Genome duplications and accelerated evolution of Hox genes and cluster architecture in teleost fishes, Am Zool., 41, 676
  61. Mehta, 2013, Evidence for at least six Hox clusters in the Japanese lamprey (Lethenteron japonicum), Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 110, 16044, 10.1073/pnas.1315760110 · DOI
  62. Metzker, 2009, Sequencing technologies—the next generation, Nat Rev Genet., 11, 31, 10.1038/nrg2626 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Meyer, 2005, From 2R to 3R: evidence for a fish-specific genome duplication (FSGD), BioEssays, 27, 937, 10.1002/bies.20293 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Mungpakdee, 2008, Differential evolution of the 13 Atlantic salmon Hox clusters, Mol Biol Evol., 25, 1333, 10.1093/molbev/msn097 · DOI
  65. Muse, 1994, A likelihood approach for comparing synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitution rates, with application to the chloroplast genome, Mol Biol Evol., 11, 715
  66. Near, 2012, Resolution of ray-finned fish phylogeny and timing of diversification, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 109, 13698, 10.1073/pnas.1206625109 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Nehrt, 2011, Testing the ortholog conjecture with comparative functional genomic data from mammals, PLoS Comput Biol., 7, e1002073, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002073 · DOI
  68. Nei, 2005, Concerted and birth-and-death evolution of multigene families, Annu Rev Genet., 39, 121, 10.1146/annurev.genet.39.073003.112240 · DOI · Paper page
  69. Ohno, 1970, Evolution by gene duplication, 10.1007/978-3-642-86659-3 · DOI · Paper page
  70. Otto, 2007, The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy, Cell, 131, 452, 10.1016/j.cell.2007.10.022 · DOI
  71. Otto, 2000, Polyploid incidence and evolution, Annu Rev Genet., 34, 401, 10.1146/annurev.genet.34.1.401 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Oulion, 2010, Evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes: insights from a survey of a shark (Scyliorhinus canicula) transcriptome, Mol Biol Evol., 27, 2829, 10.1093/molbev/msq172 · DOI
  73. Pascual-Anaya, 2013, Evolution of Hox gene clusters in deuterostomes, BMC Dev Biol., 13, 26, 10.1186/1471-213X-13-26 · DOI
  74. Pennacchio, 2006, In vivo enhancer analysis of human conserved non-coding sequences, Nature, 444, 499, 10.1038/nature05295 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Pick, 2012, Hox gene evolution: multiple mechanisms contributing to evolutionary novelties, Ann N Y Acad Sci., 1256, 15, 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06385.x · DOI
  76. Pond, 2005, HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies, Bioinformatics, 21, 676, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti079 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Putnam, 2008, The amphioxus genome and the evolution of the chordate karyotype, Nature, 453, 1064, 10.1038/nature06967 · DOI
  78. Qiu, 2011, Unresolved orthology and peculiar coding sequence properties of lamprey genes: the KCNA gene family as test case, BMC Genomics, 12, 325, 10.1186/1471-2164-12-325 · DOI
  79. Ravi, 2009, Elephant shark (Callorhinchus milii) provides insights into the evolution of Hox gene clusters in gnathostomes, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 106, 16327, 10.1073/pnas.0907914106 · DOI
  80. Ravi, 2008, Rapidly evolving fish genomes and teleost diversity, Curr Opin Genet Dev., 18, 544, 10.1016/j.gde.2008.11.001 · DOI
  81. Salmon, 2010, Homoeologous nonreciprocal recombination in polyploid cotton, New Phytol., 186, 123, 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2009.03093.x · DOI
  82. Shimeld, 2012, Evolutionary crossroads in developmental biology: cyclostomes (lamprey and hagfish), Development, 139, 2091, 10.1242/dev.074716 · DOI
  83. Shimodaira, 2002, An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection, Syst Biol., 51, 492, 10.1080/10635150290069913 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Shimodaira, 2001, CONSEL: for assessing the confidence of phylogenetic tree selection, Bioinformatics, 17, 1246, 10.1093/bioinformatics/17.12.1246 · DOI
  85. Sidow, 1996, Gen(om)e duplications in the evolution of early vertebrates, Curr Opin Genet Dev., 6, 715, 10.1016/S0959-437X(96)80026-8 · DOI
  86. Smith, 2013, Sequencing of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) genome provides insights into vertebrate evolution, Nat Genet., 45, 415, 10.1038/ng.2568 · DOI
  87. Söding, 2005, Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison, Bioinformatics, 21, 951, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti125 · DOI
  88. Stadler, 2004, Evidence for independent Hox gene duplications in the hagfish lineage: a PCR-based gene inventory of Eptatretus stoutii, Mol Phylogenet Evol., 32, 686, 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.03.015 · DOI
  89. Stamatakis, 2006, RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models, Bioinformatics, 22, 2688, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl446 · DOI · Paper page
  90. Stebbins, 1947, Types of polyploids; their classification and significance, Adv Genet., 1, 403, 10.1016/S0065-2660(08)60490-3 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Studer, 2009, How confident can we be that orthologs are similar, but paralogs differ?, Trends Genet., 25, 210, 10.1016/j.tig.2009.03.004 · DOI
  92. Sullivan, 2004, Simultaneous analysis of five molecular markers provides a well-supported phylogenetic hypothesis for the living bony-tongue fishes (Osteoglossomorpha: Teleostei), Mol Phylogenet Evol., 33, 171, 10.1016/j.ympev.2004.04.021 · DOI
  93. Taylor, 2001, Revisiting recent challenges to the ancient fish-specific genome duplication hypothesis, Curr Biol., 11, R1005, 10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00610-8 · DOI
  94. Thornton, 2000, Gene family evolution and homology: genomics meets phylogenetics, Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet., 1, 41, 10.1146/annurev.genom.1.1.41 · DOI
  95. Tümpel, 2006, Evolution of cis elements in the differential expression of two Hoxa2 coparalogous genes in pufferfish (Takifugu rubripes), Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 103, 5419, 10.1073/pnas.0600993103 · DOI
  96. Van de Peer, 2010, 2R or not 2R is not the question anymore, Nat Rev Genet., 11, 166, 10.1038/nrg2600-c2 · DOI
  97. Vandepoele, 2004, Major events in the genome evolution of vertebrates: paranome age and size differ considerably between ray-finned fishes and land vertebrates, Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A., 101, 1638, 10.1073/pnas.0307968100 · DOI
  98. Venkatesh, 2006, Ancient noncoding elements conserved in the human genome, Science, 314, 1892, 10.1126/science.1130708 · DOI
  99. Wada, 1999, Colinear and segmental expression of amphioxus Hox genes, Dev Biol., 213, 131, 10.1006/dbio.1999.9369 · DOI
  100. Wendel, 2000, Genome evolution in polyploids, Plant Mol Biol., 42, 225, 10.1023/A:1006392424384 · DOI
  101. White, 1994, Out of deepest Africa, Tropical Fish Hobbyist, 43, 106
  102. Wolfe, 2001, Yesterday’s polyploids and the mystery of diploidization, Nat Rev Genet., 2, 333, 10.1038/35072009 · DOI
  103. Woltering, 2006, The zebrafish hoxDb cluster has been reduced to a single microRNA, Nat Genet., 38, 601, 10.1038/ng0606-601 · DOI
  104. Zhong, 2008, HomeoDB: a database of homeobox gene diversity, Evol Dev., 10, 516, 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2008.00266.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Martin, K. J., & Holland, P. W. H.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Publisher
Oxford University Press (OUP)
Published
2014-06-27
Volume
31
Issue
10
Pages
2592-2611
ISSN
  • 1537-1719
  • 0737-4038
DOI
10.1093/molbev/msu202
PMC
PMC4166920
Cited by
46
References
5
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review