Cited by 31Genomics and Rare DiseasesMachine Learning in BioinformaticsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

High-throughput deep learning variant effect prediction with Sequence UNET

Open access
Dunham, Alistair S., Beltrao, Pedro, AlQuraishi, Mohammed·2023·Genome Biology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Understanding coding mutations is important for many applications in biology and medicine but the vast mutation space makes comprehensive experimental characterisation impossible. Current predictors are often computationally intensive and difficult to scale, including recent deep learning models. We introduce Sequence UNET, a highly scalable deep learning architecture that classifies and predicts variant frequency from sequence alone using multi-scale representations from a fully convolutional compression/expansion architecture. It achieves comparable pathogenicity prediction to recent methods. We demonstrate scalability by analysing 8.3B variants in 904,134 proteins detected through large-scale proteomics. Sequence UNET runs on modest hardware with a simple Python package.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13059-023-02948-3

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dunham, A. S., Beltrao, P., & AlQuraishi, M.
Affiliations
  • European Bioinformatics Institute (GB)
  • Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Dunham, Alistair S.
Venue
Genome Biology
Published
2023-05-09
Volume
24
Issue
1
Pages
110-110
ISSN
  • 1465-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1474-760X
OpenAlex
W4376133226
Cited by
31
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1
FWCI
4.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genome biology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (220540/Z/20/A)
  • Helmut Horten Stiftung
  • ETH Zürich Foundation
  • EMBL´s European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL-EBI)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
variant effect prediction, coding mutations, pathogenicity prediction, protein mutations
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Mutation, Proteomics, Data Compression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review