Cited by 143Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsPluripotent Stem Cells ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 157 of the 157 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stem cell models of Alzheimer’s disease: progress and challenges

Open access
Arber, Charles, Lovejoy, Christopher, Wray, Selina·2017·Alzheimer's Research & Therapy

Abstract

A major challenge to our understanding of the molecular mechanisms of Alzheimer's disease (AD) has been the lack of physiologically relevant in vitro models which capture the precise patient genome, in the cell type of interest, with physiological expression levels of the gene(s) of interest. Induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) technology, together with advances in 2D and 3D neuronal differentiation, offers a unique opportunity to overcome this challenge and generate a limitless supply of human neurons for in vitro studies. iPSC-neuron models have been widely employed to model AD and we discuss in this review the progress that has been made to date using patient-derived neurons to recapitulate key aspects of AD pathology and how these models have contributed to a deeper understanding of AD molecular mechanisms, as well as addressing the key challenges posed by using this technology and what progress is being made to overcome these. Finally, we highlight future directions for the use of iPSC-neurons in AD research and highlight the potential value of this technology to neurodegenerative research in the coming years.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s13195-017-0268-4

Cites

157 of 157 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1 Stem cell applications. Schematic to depict the potential applications of stem cell technology. Patient material is reprogrammed to iPSCs via the four reprogramming genes. Relevant advantages and disadvantages of the subsequent differentaition to cortical neurons via 2D and 3D methods are discussed. Finally, applications for stem cell-derived neurons are depicted, namely drug screening, investigating disease mechanisms, in vivo transplantation of neuronal material to model organisms as well as the potential for cell therapy
Fig. 1 Stem cell applications. Schematic to depict the potential applications of stem cell technology. Patient material is reprogrammed to iPSCs via the four reprogramming genes. Relevant advantages and disadvantages of the subsequent differentaition to cortical neurons via 2D and 3D methods are discussed. Finally, applications for stem cell-derived neurons are depicted, namely drug screening, investigating disease mechanisms, in vivo transplantation of neuronal material to model organisms as well as the potential for cell therapyCC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

2 retracted

Show all 157 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Huang Y-WA, Zhou B, Wernig M, Südhof TCTC. ApoE2, ApoE3, and ApoE4 differentially stimulate APP transcription and Aβ secretion. Cell. 2017;168(3):427–41.e21. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Arber, C., Lovejoy, C., & Wray, S.
Affiliations
UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Corresponding author
Wray, Selina
Venue
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
Published
2017-06-13
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
42-42
ISSN
1758-9193 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2624768339
Cited by
143
References
157
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 19
FWCI
2.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Alzheimer s Research & Therapy (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer’s Research UK
  • National Centre for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research
  • National Institute for Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Pluripotent Stem Cells Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, induced pluripotent stem cells, iPSC-derived neurons, patient-derived neurons, neuronal differentiation, in vitro disease model, neurodegeneration
MeSH terms
Alzheimer Disease, Animals, Cells, Cultured, Disease Models, Animal, Humans, Organoids, Tissue Engineering, Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells, Neural Stem Cells, Batch Cell Culture Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review